
Isn't she lovely? Even during her seizure attacks her charm is unrivaled.
Xyga wrote:Liar. I've known you only from latexmachomen.com and pantysniffers.org forums.chum wrote:the thing is that we actually go way back and have known each other on multiple websites, first clashing in a Naruto forum.
Nothing like getting your vetted official statements from the DNC's unofficial Pravda publications. Let's see, I saw NBC and Politico connected: any other news sources I should add to the list of "never read/watch again"? inb4 Fox News. MSNBC is already there, too.quash wrote:Good luck denying DNC ties to major media outlets
Xyga wrote:Liar. I've known you only from latexmachomen.com and pantysniffers.org forums.chum wrote:the thing is that we actually go way back and have known each other on multiple websites, first clashing in a Naruto forum.
Nah he's still winning. Hill's at -17, he's at -20.Mischief Maker wrote:Even in a contest over who can be the most unlikable candidate, Trump is still losing!
Somebody tell her mind controlling masters not to send so many signals at once.Durandal wrote:
Isn't she lovely? Even during her seizure attacks her charm is unrivaled.
He's the best!Durandal wrote:Real-time footage and an in-depth explanation of the hack
I imagine zero personal interest.antron wrote:I wonder if Bernie is interested at all in the DNC chair.
Glad all my hard planning paid off~Having read absolutely *none* of the posts in this topic, I just wanted to comment on my amusement that every word in the topic is capitalized except one, which is funny.
Hopefully he can apply the same level of scrutiny to the wage gap, disproportionate police brutality against blacks, and other lynchpins of modern liberalism that are only rooted in the hardest of facts and purest of reason.BulletMagnet wrote:Uh oh, Skynet got to John Oliver too!
Hate the Al but when it comes to his Senate work, he actually works and don't BS. That's why MN loves him IMO. Don't agree on his positions but I wish I had a Senator like that in FL (Bill Nelson is really meh and don't do much and Rubio, lol).Bitter Almonds wrote:I hate sarah loserman and al cranken.
Uh, picking a topic and attempting to present factual information about it (and yes, there are jokes too, I noticed) is pretty much the entire premise of his show.quash wrote:Hopefully he can apply the same level of scrutiny to the wage gap, disproportionate police brutality against blacks, and other lynchpins of modern liberalism that are only rooted in the hardest of facts and purest of reason.
I seriously hope for your sake that you don't take anything that clown presents as "fact" at face value. If for no other reason, you should do your absolute best to avoid getting your information from those who frame it to fit their narrative (even, and especially, if it's disguised as "comedy").BulletMagnet wrote: Uh, picking a topic and attempting to present factual information about it (and yes, there are jokes too, I noticed) is pretty much the entire premise of his show.
What are you grasping at here? It's already been proven by the DNC leaks that plenty of media outlets have been corroborating with them (some going as far as submitting articles to the DNC for approval before release). There has been a concerted effort to subvert and control the news cycle, and that's just based off of the evidence that's now out in the open.Not that it matters, because whatever the stat sheets say (the ones that don't conform to my preconceived notions must all be doctored by the establishment anyway, amirite?) it doesn't even remotely count if your feelings tell you otherwise.
If there's a shill on this forum, it's you. You've shown all of the signature marks of a shill and don't bother defending any position past claiming that nobody else "makes sense", conveniently ignoring that the vast majority of your stated positions are also rooted at least partially in emotional appeal.Trump/Tinkerbell '16.Who's "shilling" here, again?