tl;dr
- Look at the Samsung 2TB M9T HDD if you value capacity over performance.
- Look at the Seagate 1TB ST1000LX001 SSHD 32GB flash if you want a potential performance boost and don't mind the inherent SSHD risks (though check here first).
- Look at the Western Digital 1TB WD10SPCX HDD for a conservative upgrade.
broken harbour wrote:I personally would go for a fast 500GB or 1TB SSD personally, as the loading times in most games are significantly improved.
If
this is to be believed the PS4 SATA controller caps the SSD gain to about 32% which may not be enough to justify the expense.
See also:
Should You Upgrade Your PS4 With an SSD?
Typically depending on the game an SSD will save between 5-15 seconds of loading time per loading sequence.
There is lots of advice to go with an SSHD hybrid instead because of the cost savings but that is only based on performance-after-installation. These drives use a 8/16/32GB SSD as a cache - as far as I'm aware being used as cache is hell-on-earth for NAND flash memory, so that cache is likely going to fail much sooner than a full size SSD drive - at best leaving you with a cache-less HDD (unless a buffer is available - which often seems to be the case).
https://www.sdd.toshiba.com.tw/english/ ... /faq5.aspx
toshiba.com wrote:
I have heard that NAND flash can wear out over time. What happens if the NAND component in the Toshiba Hybrid Drive reaches its endurance limit? Will data be lost?
Should the user exceed the endurance limit of the NAND flash, the Toshiba MQ01ABDH will continue functioning as a conventional HDD. However, before the NAND flash component reaches the endurance limits, its performance will gradually decline. Due to Toshiba’s NAND flash caching algorithms and data protection mechanisms, Toshiba does not expect an increased risk of data loss resulting from aging of the NAND flash on the Toshiba MQ01ABDH Hybrid Drive during the expected lifetime of a PC.
So personally I remain skeptical about SSHDs unless there is some kind of self imposed best-before-date (2-3 years?); though hypothetically you could just wait for the drive to degrade (i.e. treat an SSHD as a "consumable component") and then back it up and replace it (typically the need for this happens at the most inconvenient time).
However I would concur that capping the upgrade to 1TB might be a good idea as high capacity drives tend to be slower - so if you are already unhappy with loading times a > 1TB HDD is likely going to aggravate the problem (especially as you are restricted to the 2.5 inch form factor).
http://www.gamesradar.com/best-hard-drive-for-ps4/
gamesradar.com wrote:
Samsung 2TB M9T
...
It is no quicker than the hard drive which comes with standard PS4, so this is the option for those with a huge gaming library but aren’t too concerned with their current game loading speeds.
Furthermore (inexpensive) high-capacity drives are usually targeted for low-duty backup or redundant RAID operation (i.e. stored data is typically duplicated elsewhere in case of failure - i.e. they are manufactured as "consumable components").
Bitter Almonds wrote:I had a Seagate in mind since I've been using Seagate-branded external HDDs since 2010 without issues.
Well, count yourself lucky. Just last summer I had to replace a Seagate Barracuda ST2000DM0001 after 3 years of light duty. Personally I typically go for Western Digital but I'm under no illusions - all the manufacturers have "bad" batches - e.g.
https://community.wd.com/t/wd1003fzex-c ... ined/16841
http://www.gamersnexus.net/guides/1741- ... for-gaming
Last September I decided to "modernize" my Thinkpad with a Samsung MZ-7KE512BW SSD 850 PRO 2.5in SATA III [MZ-7KE512BW] and Western Digital WD Blue 2.5 1TB 5400RPM SATA 6GB/S 7.0MM 16MB CACHE [
WD10SPCX]. Now clearly due to the presence of the SSD, speed wasn't my primary concern on the WD10SPCX. 7200 rpm drives can generate more heat, more noise and more vibration - so I decided to stick with 5400 rpm. I chose the WD10SPCX over the
WD10JPVX because 16 vs 8MB buffer and 7.0 vs 9.5mm height (2 vs 3 platters).
This article uses the WD10SPCX and ST1000LM014 (SSHD 8GB Flash)‡ on a PS4. Again they give the edge to the SSHD - not so sure about their statement regarding an 7200 rpm HDD for "some serious performance enhancements" given how much the PS4 SATA controller throttles SSD performance - especially considering the potential heat/noise/vibration trade-offs with 7200 rpm.
(The WD SSHD equivalent would be the
WD10J31X - the good news is that it, just like the Seagate, it comes with a 64MB Buffer in addition to the 8GB flash, so it probably wouldn't be any slower than the stock drive once the flash dies).
(‡ There is also the 32GB Flash ST1000LX001).
So I guess you are going to have to figure out what is most important to you ...