It does work both ways though. I guess I'll give richie one on the realism thing - I understand what he means there. Glitter and shine of recent films gets in the way of the story. I don't think that the Terminator just boils down to "terminates things," as a concept - there is the other stuff, the anti-human side ("fuck you, asshole") as well as other ways of giving them a personality. I think the liquid metal Terminator had a pretty convincing personality, and felt sort of similar to the original Terminator, but with some important differences beyond the CG.
Terminator films without time travel...well, I'd like to see as little of big time travel machines, effects, and PLOT TWEESTS as possible, but time travel literally starts the franchise. I don't think you can do away with it completely.
Overall, it probably boils down to: personality, getting back to basics, simplicity. It's very easy for reworkings of old franchises to make things too convoluted.
Who will save the Terminator franchise?
Re: Who will save the Terminator franchise?
Terminator Gen was one of the worst but better then salvation ofcourse
and its average dumb PG-13 movie
Arnold was the best part yes but the rest r SHIT
not even 1 single memorable scene ..
watch T1 and T2
every single Scene is Masterpiece Classic
Cameron will get the rights in 2019
so please do 1 final Terminator
and its average dumb PG-13 movie
Arnold was the best part yes but the rest r SHIT
not even 1 single memorable scene ..
watch T1 and T2
every single Scene is Masterpiece Classic
Cameron will get the rights in 2019
so please do 1 final Terminator
Re: Who will save the Terminator franchise?
I've said this in another thread, but it is worth bringing up again here. T1 works because it of Arnold's presence as a perfect killing machine without personality. He moves without hesitation or fear, like a faster, more efficient Michael Myers. Despite the deep reverence a lot of people have for the late 70's/early 80's films, most of them are extremely simple in their execution--think of Jaws, Alien, Halloween and The Terminator. Great movies that work because of the presence (or eluded presence) of an unstoppable, horrifying force. This simple idea keeps those movies from being shit, and when you complicate/contaminate it with a bunch of other nonsense, it falls apart. Terminator isn't a complex scaffolding on which you can hang endless alternate plot devices--it is dirt simple: scary machine tries to kill people. Fucking run away!!!
The only reasonable thing to be done with the Terminator is a reboot that returned to that central idea, IE:
The only reasonable thing to be done with the Terminator is a reboot that returned to that central idea, IE:
neorichieb1971 wrote:I don't want to see a Terminator do anything but terminate.
SHMUP sale page.Randorama wrote:ban CMoon for being a closet Jerry Falwell cockmonster/Ann Coulter fan, Nijska a bronie (ack! The horror!), and Ed Oscuro being unable to post 100-word arguments without writing 3-pages posts.
Eugenics: you know it's right!
-
- Posts: 7875
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:28 am
- Location: Bedford, UK
- Contact:
Re: Who will save the Terminator franchise?
Genisys is one of those movies where the director explains what he wants from the scene and you cannot believe not one of the actors/actresses put their hand up and said "wait, WHAT?" 

This industry has become 2 dimensional as it transcended into a 3D world.