emphatic wrote:Lucas even looks like a fucking Ewok.

emphatic wrote:Lucas even looks like a fucking Ewok.
Willow is passable for what it is, I watched it again not too long ago. But Ron Howard directed, not Lucas.Mischief Maker wrote:HOW MUCH does Lucas have to fuck up for you to finally stop trying to shift the blame for all his mistakes? It's like pretending that Willow, Howard the Duck, and Red Tails never happened. Oh, no sir! This is still the same Lucas he was in the 70s!Lord Satori wrote:I heard Fox was behind the ewoks. They wanted to cater to a younger audience and the original script called for wookies instead.
This may or may not be true, but Fox has done some stupid shit in the past so I wouldn't be surprised if it were.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
I have a friend who said, as we walked out of the midnight viewing of The Fellowship Of The Ring, - "I liked Willow more".Skykid wrote:Willow is passable for what it is, I watched it again not too long ago. But Ron Howard directed, not Lucas.
RegalSin wrote:Street Fighters. We need to aviod them when we activate time accellerator.
Strikers1945guy wrote:"Do we....eat chicken balls?!"
This explains so many mysteries. Perhaps, all of them.emphatic wrote:Lucas even looks like a fucking Ewok.
A masterpiece compared to Star Wars Anything. There I said it.Mischief Maker wrote:Willow
Don't think you even need that much.If your brain is equipped with efficient-enough Proustian memories processing so that you can completely put yourself back into your kid-critic self, then every fucking movie from the 80's is better than P.Jackson's LotR.
That's really pushing it.emphatic wrote: I have a friend who said, as we walked out of the midnight viewing of The Fellowship Of The Ring, - "I liked Willow more".
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
Yeah... plot armor is awful writing. Guys who can regenerate are the only ones who ever get hit, bullshit like that.neorichieb1971 wrote:Are just 2 that recently watched where the script just won't kill anyone who is a hero no matter how evil/big/powerful the enemy is and its ridiculous.
It was valid in the first movie since they were told to let the princess escape. Then it entered stupid town immediately thereafter.Alec Guiness said in the first movie "Only imperial storm troopers are so precise".. Yeah right, at hitting everything 5 feet either side of what they are aiming at....
??? It wasn't an accidental hit, he stood in the way of another Avenger who was getting shot at, so if it wasn't one it would have been the other.neorichieb1971 wrote:In Avengers Age of Ultron the only good guy to die is the cause of an accidental hit, you can't even give the bad guys credit for it.
If something happens with an unintended result it is usually an accident... and in the case of the whole Avengers movie it means none of the Ultron gang actually hit any target at all. I would say it was a crap army to defend Earth with if it cannot even take down a single enemy without the aid of a freak occurrence.Drum wrote:??? It wasn't an accidental hit, he stood in the way of another Avenger who was getting shot at, so if it wasn't one it would have been the other.neorichieb1971 wrote:In Avengers Age of Ultron the only good guy to die is the cause of an accidental hit, you can't even give the bad guys credit for it.
Also, you are going to be proven spectacularly wrong with the new Star Wars movie in terms of heroes not dying.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
BIL wrote: "Small sack, LOTS OF CUM" - Nikola Tesla
Felt this same way about the first one. I felt underwhelmed by it on first viewing, but on the second watch, I recognized that Joss worked in a few little touches here and there to compensate for the fact that it was basically an hour and a half of build up to 30 minutes of explosions. Not something I'd write home about, but entertaining enough.Drum wrote:It's a good movie, but you get out of it what you bring to it. I've never seen a film torn down by so many people who had no clue what they just watched - it's much smarter than the intended audience, apparently (and it's a popcorn flick through and through).
Aeon Zenith - My STG.RegalSin wrote:Japan an almost perfect society always threatened by outsiders....................
Instead I am stuck in the America's where women rule with an iron crotch, and a man could get arrested for sitting behind a computer too long.
Just going to say that I was only relaying something I heard awhile ago. I'm some Lucas worshipping scrub who'll defend him to the death or some shit. Ewoks or not, he still created those effin gungans, which is a worse travesty in my opinion.Lord Satori wrote:I heard Fox was behind the ewoks. They wanted to cater to a younger audience and the original script called for wookies instead.
This may or may not be true, but Fox has done some stupid shit in the past so I wouldn't be surprised if it were.
I'd hardly count a vague "somebody died instead of somebody else" a spoiler. I haven't seen the movie either, but it isn't like they specified who or where.Skykid wrote:Have all you bitches forgotten there's a spoiler tag.
BryanM wrote:You're trapped in a haunted house. There's a ghost. It wants to eat your friends and have sex with your cat. When forced to decide between the lives of your friends and the chastity of your kitty, you choose the cat.
So going into a movie expecting at least one of the main cast to die in the finale by defending another member of the main cast doesn't constitute a spoiler in any way.Lord Satori wrote:
I'd hardly count a vague "somebody died instead of somebody else" a spoiler. I haven't seen the movie either, but it isn't like they specified who or where.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
Maybe as a little kid he may have seemed cool, but holy shit does Val Solo fail to match the charisma of young Harrison Ford!Skykid wrote:Xyga, the first 20 minutes of Willow is the hump. If Val Kilmer's character hadn't turned up shortly thereafter I think I would have closed it down too.
A2 is a much trickier, denser movie than the first - you really need to pay attention, which is something you really don't expect to have to do with movies like this. Seen so many people miss so many basic plot points, character beats and themes and this really seems to have killed their enjoyment. I'm not convinced it's the movie's fault, however - it's not *that* hard. But it is definitely the most complicated movie of its kind - tougher nut than Watchmen or the Batflicks.Squire Grooktook wrote:Felt this same way about the first one. I felt underwhelmed by it on first viewing, but on the second watch, I recognized that Joss worked in a few little touches here and there to compensate for the fact that it was basically an hour and a half of build up to 30 minutes of explosions. Not something I'd write home about, but entertaining enough.Drum wrote:It's a good movie, but you get out of it what you bring to it. I've never seen a film torn down by so many people who had no clue what they just watched - it's much smarter than the intended audience, apparently (and it's a popcorn flick through and through).
RegalSin wrote:Street Fighters. We need to aviod them when we activate time accellerator.
Actually kind of a beautiful thing for me.NTSC-J wrote:Star Wars: The Force Awakens - Comic-Con 2015 Reel
Really sounds like they're talking to the older generation of Star Wars fans by continuing to mention all the practical effects.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
What prequels? :3Skykid wrote:When this comes out I'm hoping it will make me instantaneously forget the prequels ever existed.
Ha ha, yeah!Icarus wrote:What prequels? :3Skykid wrote:When this comes out I'm hoping it will make me instantaneously forget the prequels ever existed.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
emphatic wrote:Looks very nice though.
I guess my comment came off as a complaint, but that's not at all what I meant. I'm all for practical effects, especially for Star Wars. The shitty editing, acting, characters, direction, dialogue, plot, and pillaging of the original trilogy aside, the most offensive thing to me about the prequels was the overuse of CG.Skykid wrote:Actually kind of a beautiful thing for me.
Exactly what I felt. They keep mentioning that this is a Star Wars universe that feels real and lived in, implying it's not going to be that plastic, lifeless thing that George gave his fans. I doubt he'll ever say it in public, but he's got to feel like some of this is a slight to him.It's a real fuck you to Lucas too. It's like saying "look shit head, this is how you were supposed to do it".
Oh, internally it must be an incredibly painful thing. As much as I'm angry about his absolute fail, how badly he cocked absolutely everything up, and the stain he left on the legacy, part of me understands the retrospective turmoil he must have on a daily basis whenever he recalls his ineptness and the destruction of what should have been a wonderful thing.NTSC-J wrote:Exactly what I felt. They keep mentioning that this is a Star Wars universe that feels real and lived in, implying it's not going to be that plastic, lifeless thing that George gave his fans. I doubt he'll ever say it in public, but he's got to feel like some of this is a slight to him.It's a real fuck you to Lucas too. It's like saying "look shit head, this is how you were supposed to do it".
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
I'll put it like this....Mischief Maker wrote:HOW MUCH does Lucas have to fuck up for you to finally stop trying to shift the blame for all his mistakes? It's like pretending that Willow, Howard the Duck, and Red Tails never happened. Oh, no sir! This is still the same Lucas he was in the 70s!Lord Satori wrote:I heard Fox was behind the ewoks. They wanted to cater to a younger audience and the original script called for wookies instead.
This may or may not be true, but Fox has done some stupid shit in the past so I wouldn't be surprised if it were.