
Any Stanley Kubrick fans?
-
superhitachi4
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 11:30 pm
- Location: RLC Jr.
Any Stanley Kubrick fans?
Some of my favorites are: Dr. Strangelove, The Shining, and 2001: A Space Odyssey. Watched Dr. Strangelove again for the first time in quite a while, and thought I'd post. 


Kubrick is like the Radiant Silvergun of film directors. Very good, but gets a bit blown out of proportion sometimes. It's not like all his movies are amazing masterpieces.
I think I've seen everything he made post-Spartacus. My favorite would have to be Barry Lyndon. A very underappreciated film, but I think it's his best.
I think I've seen everything he made post-Spartacus. My favorite would have to be Barry Lyndon. A very underappreciated film, but I think it's his best.
I think the RSG comparison is very apt. I would be hard pressed to find someone who didn't like Kubrick, but he never made a film that was ever dear to me. There are films I really love by directors who aren't half as good, but who made films that were not so impersonal.
SHMUP sale page.Randorama wrote:ban CMoon for being a closet Jerry Falwell cockmonster/Ann Coulter fan, Nijska a bronie (ack! The horror!), and Ed Oscuro being unable to post 100-word arguments without writing 3-pages posts.
Eugenics: you know it's right!
-
MadSteelDarkness
- Posts: 894
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:46 pm
- Location: Dancing at the penny arcade
Stanley Kubrick is one of my biggest influences, in terms of his sense of composition and use of natural lighting. I think it's safe to say that without him, I never would have become a cinematographer (or at least, an occasional one
).
I think he died before he should have. He was only 70, and Eyes Wide Shut should not have been his final film. Although I admire the structure, and of course, the beautifully precise mis-en-scene of the film, it left me relatively cold. Had he lived, I'm quite sure it would have been regarded as one of his minor works. One can only watch the low grade shmaltz of A.I. (which Kubrick had in pre-production for years before his death) and wonder what the master would have done with that film. True, CMoon, his works always had a detached feel to them, but I personally found that to be a strength in his work.
I saw A Clockwork Orange when I was twelve, and haven't been the same since. I would go so far as to say that Kubrick was the Bach of filmmakers.

I think he died before he should have. He was only 70, and Eyes Wide Shut should not have been his final film. Although I admire the structure, and of course, the beautifully precise mis-en-scene of the film, it left me relatively cold. Had he lived, I'm quite sure it would have been regarded as one of his minor works. One can only watch the low grade shmaltz of A.I. (which Kubrick had in pre-production for years before his death) and wonder what the master would have done with that film. True, CMoon, his works always had a detached feel to them, but I personally found that to be a strength in his work.
I saw A Clockwork Orange when I was twelve, and haven't been the same since. I would go so far as to say that Kubrick was the Bach of filmmakers.
I'm a big Kubrick fan. Dr. Strangelove is my favorite, followed by Clockwork Orange and Lolita. I like most of his movies -- I think his early work holds up very well also, Paths of Glory in particular. Many people diss on Eyes Wide Shut, but I thought it did an excellent job of conveying the remote atmosphere and personal interaction that the plot portrayed.

We here shall not rest until we have made a drawing-room of your shaft, and if you do not all finally go down to your doom in patent-leather shoes, then you shall not go at all.
-
TWITCHDOCTOR
- Posts: 1479
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: South Texas USA
- Contact:
Funny you should mention that.
I've been watching "The Shining" for the last few nights!!! Jack's a total madman!!! I picked it up on VHS new for 3 bucks. I've always liked it, but now its without commercials and censorship. Well, I did see it on HBO like around 20 years ago!!!
2001's cool too. I just havent seen it in 2 decades or more.
I've been watching "The Shining" for the last few nights!!! Jack's a total madman!!! I picked it up on VHS new for 3 bucks. I've always liked it, but now its without commercials and censorship. Well, I did see it on HBO like around 20 years ago!!!

2001's cool too. I just havent seen it in 2 decades or more.
-
- Posts: 7915
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:28 am
- Location: Bedford, UK
- Contact:
-
MOSQUITO FIGHTER
- Posts: 1738
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 7:32 pm
-
Stormwatch
- Posts: 2327
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 1:04 am
- Location: Brazil
- Contact:
-
professor ganson
- Posts: 5163
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 3:59 am
- Location: OHIO
Kubrick manages to be both widely accessible and challenging at the same time. He consistently manages to pull off this combination as well as anyone. I don't think about his work so much these days, but Clockwork Orange, 2001, and The Shining were each very important to me at different times in my life.
-
Thunder Force
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:21 am
- Location: research and development facility for Vasteel Technology.
2001 is one of the most important films in history. It's influence was/is staggering. And the limited edition DVD set (released in the actual year 2001) for this movie is wonderful, magical clarity and they even kept the original theatrical intermission between reels. Now I can't wait for a Blu-Ray DVD version. 

"Thunder Force VI does not suck, shut your fucking mouth." ~ Shane Bettenhausen
-
TWITCHDOCTOR
- Posts: 1479
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: South Texas USA
- Contact:
Yea, he's so crazy, its almost cool! As in the way he taunts her with flickings of the tounge, and finger movements.undamned wrote:Serious! I remember when he's telling his wife, "I don't want to hurt you, I just want to bash your f'ing head in!" Wow.TWITCHDOCTOR wrote:I've been watching "The Shining" for the last few nights!!! Jack's a total madman!!!
-ud
On a real serious note...I can relate to his character in the movie.
-
Last Guardian
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:46 pm
- Location: Les Pays Bas
...before or after the mental breakdown ?
Kubrick is probably my favourite film director (before Kitano, Gilliam and Stone). I must have watched 2001 over 5 times by now, pure genious. I can really dream away with all that spacey ballet going on. Dr. Strangelove is comedy gold and features many unforgettable scenes.
Did EWS and A.I. have different directors ? I think that E.W.S. has much more of a Kubrick-flick feel to it then A.I.
Kubrick is probably my favourite film director (before Kitano, Gilliam and Stone). I must have watched 2001 over 5 times by now, pure genious. I can really dream away with all that spacey ballet going on. Dr. Strangelove is comedy gold and features many unforgettable scenes.
Did EWS and A.I. have different directors ? I think that E.W.S. has much more of a Kubrick-flick feel to it then A.I.
Airspace under control get back 100 %
Kubrik owes a lot to the books he has based his movies on. Practically every movie that I can think of that he has made has been based on a book (maybe The Killing wasn't). While he is a great visual director, much of the recognition he gets is because he chooses really interesting books to make movies out of.
For instance, the things we love most about Space Odyssey (the Black Obelisk, HAL), Stanely Kubrik wasn't even responsible for - chalk that up to Arthur C. Clarke. And would the Shining be even half as good without Jack Nicholson?
For instance, the things we love most about Space Odyssey (the Black Obelisk, HAL), Stanely Kubrik wasn't even responsible for - chalk that up to Arthur C. Clarke. And would the Shining be even half as good without Jack Nicholson?
-
scrilla4rella
- Posts: 948
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 2:16 am
- Location: Berkeley, CA
-
professor ganson
- Posts: 5163
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 3:59 am
- Location: OHIO
-
SPACE HARRIER
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 7:46 pm
- Location: Netherlands
- Contact:
Whoa! Are you sure about that man? I'm curious, can you find me source about it?scrilla4rella wrote:Actually, the storyline of 2001 was co-developed as a novel and movie by Clark and Kubrick together. They both collabarated on the story.
This might just blow my mind.
I agree. I didn't mean to insinuate that wasn't the case.Seven Force wrote:It's not like every movie based on a great novel or starring Jack Nicholson is automatically great though.
A LOT depends on the script and the director.
-
superhitachi4
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 11:30 pm
- Location: RLC Jr.
Get the paperback. In the prologue/preface/whatever, Clarke tells the whole story about working with Kubrick. I think the film actually ended up being released before the book. Unfortunately, I lost my copy so I can't give you any more detail than that.Andi wrote:Whoa! Are you sure about that man? I'm curious, can you find me source about it?scrilla4rella wrote:Actually, the storyline of 2001 was co-developed as a novel and movie by Clark and Kubrick together. They both collabarated on the story.
This might just blow my mind.
Either way, the story was based on a short story called The Sentinel that Clarke wrote earlier.
I must say I enjoyed the film more after reading the book.
-
professor ganson
- Posts: 5163
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 3:59 am
- Location: OHIO