For anyone who doesn't know, most (all?) BVM's have an hours counter built in so you can check to see how much it's been used.
kamiboy wrote:For what it is worth as a person who has owned quite a few PVM/BVM and other CRT monitors I'd say for my taste the 2530 gave me the best picture that I ever saw.
I now very bitterly regret selling that beauty.
The BVM A20F1U that I have in my possession produces "scanlines" that are way too pronounced. I consider it useless for 240p content. In fact I use my comparatively lowfi B&O MX4200 for 15khz content. The same overly pronounced scanlines holds true for the PVM 20L5 and likely other dual sync SONY monitors capable of both 15 and 32khz.
The 15khz only SONY monitors are the way to go, and do not get caught up in the deceiving web of metrics by going for the monitor with the highest or best this or that. As far 15khz gaming is concerned SONY hit the sweet spot in the 80's with pro monitors such as 2530. Everything after that is needless excess in my opinion.
Interesting, typically people chase after RGB on CRT's for sharpness and scanlines, including myself. I bet you would be plenty happy with a late model component capable consumer-grade CRT with an RGB to Component converter. I'm actually a bit jealous. There is a seemingly limitless amount of free CRT's on craigslist that would fit the bill for you, while I'm stuck pining after unicorns like an XM29, ha!

I know you already saw it, but here's a post I just made this morning comparing a "needless and excessive" 20" PVM vs. a PVM-2530.
aaronmjr wrote:I picked up a couple PVM-2530's recently and don't get me wrong the picture is nice, but they are 560 line monitors and don't hold a candle to my PVM-20M4U (800 line) in sharpness and scanline definition. The color is better on the 2530's though. Here is a comparison between the two using a CMVS via RGB:
PVM-2530 (560 lines)
PVM-20M4U (800 lines)
PVM-2530 (560 lines)
PVM-20M4U (800 lines)
The close ups make the difference look pretty dramatic, but truth be told after you get a few feet away they both look great, just in different ways.
fagin wrote:BNC is a connection method and VGA is a video signal.
Old post I know, but VGA is sort of an ambiguous term. It refers to 640x480 resolution, 15 pin d-sub connector AND the analog video signal. Calling all 3 of those things VGA is technically correct.