Strikers 1945: 1 or 2?

This is the main shmups forum. Chat about shmups in here - keep it on-topic please!
Post Reply

one or deuce?

1
18
42%
2
24
56%
I dismiss them as being too similar despite the fact that the charge shot mechanic and gameplay are totally different
1
2%
 
Total votes: 43

User avatar
Neon
Posts: 3529
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:31 pm

Strikers 1945: 1 or 2?

Post by Neon »

I'd be interested to know how people in general feel about these two. Sequels in general seem to be a lot less popular than the originals in a series. Certainly seems to be the case with this game. People here often praise 1, but 2 gets no love. Don't get me wrong, 1 is an excellent game, but two might be the best damn shmup in the universe. Better graphics, better music, better, more bulletous gameplay, and all around is pretty much better than your favorite game.
User avatar
llabnip
Posts: 370
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:04 pm

Re: Strikers 1945: 1 or 2?

Post by llabnip »

Strikers 1945 II is an AMAZING shooter. It's #3 on my all-time shmup list. I ran the high-score thread for a couple of years. What a great game and it comes highly recommended.

However, Strikers I is #2 on my all-time shmup list. I like the level design better and the music is more agreeable to me and I _love_ the fact that you don't have a charge meter to worry about. It's pure shooting love right down to the core... distilled goodness...

(and everyone knows what my #1 shooter of all-time is).
llabnip - DaveB
Once more the light shines brightly in sector 2814.
User avatar
it290
Posts: 2544
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:00 am
Location: polar malortex, illinois

Post by it290 »

#1, because I like the charge shot mechanics and boss design better.
User avatar
mannerbot
Posts: 1158
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:07 pm
Location: California

Post by mannerbot »

The original.
User avatar
Tychom
Posts: 166
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 9:40 pm
Location: Paris

Post by Tychom »

#2 for me. I find it to be more freeform, you can approach the bosses and parts of the stages in a much looser fashion than in #1. With #1 I find you have to follow a particular pattern much more closely having to target each boss a certain way with your charge at a particular time, otherwise you make if incredibly tricky for yourself.

Of course learning when & where to use the charge shot is integral to many psikyo games and when looking at 1 & 2 we're only talking small differences.

I do like the explosion sounds & music of #1 more though.
User avatar
The Bullet Dodger
Posts: 207
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 10:27 pm
Location: Brentwood, CA

Post by The Bullet Dodger »

Striker 1945 II for me. I just get more enjoyment out of it. But the 1st one is still a great shmup, no questioning that.
User avatar
aphexacid
Posts: 99
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 8:42 pm
Location: Chicago

Post by aphexacid »

I love the original by far. has way more personality if you ask me. i do like part 2 on saturn though. very nice. Strikers orignal all the way.
User avatar
Rob
Posts: 8075
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 12:58 am

Re: Strikers 1945: 1 or 2?

Post by Rob »

Neon wrote:but 2 gets no love.
How not true this is! The high score thread llabnip alluded to had about 40 players it seems. That was the most I've ever seen participate in a score thread.

I'm kind of torn between the two. Both annoy me in a major way, in certain ways.

1 - More appealing graphics and soundtrack. Ships and strategy are a little too similar from ship to ship for me. I really dislike the infinite use one type charge shots in early Psikyo games. Game also has too many levels.

2 - Hideous graphics, terrible soundtrack, played it to death so the opening stages are really tedious. But playing as different ships is actually fun, charge bar strategy is much better, bosses are better. Stages 5 and 6 are two of my favorite stages.

2, for the memories, but I'd rather play GB2 or Dragon Blaze.
User avatar
PsikyoPshumpPshooterP
Posts: 1036
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:24 pm
Location: I shit on Danmaku Dreamer's head

Post by PsikyoPshumpPshooterP »

2>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>1

but 1999>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>2

but Plus>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>1

but 1>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Gunbird

but Sengoku Ace>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Gunbird

but Gunbird>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Choaniki
The cave whore count in this thread is unbelievable!!!
User avatar
Ex_Mosquito
Posts: 587
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:17 pm
Location: United Kingdom, Newport S.Wales

Post by Ex_Mosquito »

Strikers 1945II for me too. It just feels a more accomplished game : rationed charge shot, prettier patterns. Sure, it must have the worse soundtrack to any game ever (what were they thinking) but it just plays so damn good. Oh, and was my most played shooter ever! The hours i put into that game... :?
My Arcade 1-Credit Replays
http://www.youtube.com/user/exmosquito
User avatar
tehkao
Posts: 354
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 6:34 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Post by tehkao »

How about Strikers 1945 III? Doesn't that totally pwn parts 1 and 2??
User avatar
Nei First
Posts: 436
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: Climatrol

Post by Nei First »

If I remember correctly Strikers 1945 III didn't add much new to the series at all. Didn't the helper planes from the original make their return in this game btw?
User avatar
Cthulhu
Posts: 1368
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:02 am
Location: Colorado

Post by Cthulhu »

I think 2 is a better game than 1, but I've played 1 a whole lot more... it just holds more sentimental value for me as it was one of the first shmups I really got into.
User avatar
LoneSage
Posts: 1070
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:28 am
Location: Harman's Room

Post by LoneSage »

I like 1 a bit more than 2. I'm actually really surprised there's so much love for 2 here, I thought it would have overwhelmingly be 1. Overall, I like the bosses more in 1 than 2, but that train level mech in 2 is so badass...jumping from railtrack to railtrack.
I dismiss them as being too similar despite the fact that the charge shot mechanic and gameplay are totally different
Huh? They play pretty similar to me, how are they totally different?
User avatar
alpha5099
Posts: 628
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:34 am
Location: Middlebury, VT

Post by alpha5099 »

There's nothing wrong with 2, per se. But I definitely wholeheartedly prefer Strikers 1945, the original. It's a great game all around, and I prefer its design to its sequel.
User avatar
Neon
Posts: 3529
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:31 pm

Post by Neon »

terrible soundtrack
Sure, it must have the worse soundtrack to any game ever
Whaaaaaaat? 'Syumi Type O' theme > j00
User avatar
captain ahar
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:03 pm
Location: #50 Bitch!

Post by captain ahar »

play wise i like 2 a lot more, the charge mechanics feel better and medalling is more intuitive. also, the bullet patterns are more fun to dodge and as a result the bosses suffer from increased awesomeness. but man do i want a cave-style hitbox, cause i never played it enough to get a feel for the collision... and i suck. *nods*

as far as fast bits of fun in small doses the first wins out. its so much easier to pick up and play for a few minutes.

Final vote: two by a stretch. i sold my copy to BIG awhile ago, and this is definitely going to be a game i buy again, eventually.
I have no sig whatsoever.
User avatar
Ganelon
Posts: 4413
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 1:43 am

Post by Ganelon »

1: no-meter charge system and more inspiring bosses. It's also easier, if longer. I frankly think the music in both games suck, as well as the slow ship speed.
User avatar
Ghegs
Posts: 5061
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 6:18 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Post by Ghegs »

The original for me too, the gameplay just feels better (and I can get further in it :oops:) and I like the no-meter charge. Part II has slightly cooler bosses, though. Gliath...mmm.
No matter how good a game is, somebody will always hate it. No matter how bad a game is, somebody will always love it.

My videos
User avatar
iatneH
Posts: 3202
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:09 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

Post by iatneH »

Flying Pancake!!!!!!
User avatar
adam76
Posts: 175
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 11:45 pm
Location: Birmingham, England

Post by adam76 »

The original for me. Theres no overwhelming differences between the two IMO and they're both two o' the best around. Two's charge-shot mechanic feels more of a chore than an aid and the hitbox has always seemed bigger (i die more frequently in two!). I like the originals music (alot)more but the bosses in both games are as innovative as they come.

The original then. By a whisker...
"What the hell kind of a two-bit operation are they running out of this treehouse, Cooper? I have seen some slip-shod, backwater burgs, but this place takes the cake."
.
User avatar
TVG
Posts: 919
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 12:35 am

Post by TVG »

its funny, i tought i liked strikers II from the few times i played it in mame and an arcade.

now that i have supposedly the best port (psx jp), i just realized that this game bores me to death, everytime i play it, i think of what i will be doing next and when its going to be over, not only that, but the grey everything and tiny planes get me depressed :s

i guess its just not the game for me, ill trade it for something ill maybe actually enjoy, maybe on this forum.
User avatar
Diabollokus
Posts: 1267
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 3:22 pm
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Post by Diabollokus »

So should one buy both then?
Vidi Vici Veni
User avatar
raiden
Posts: 862
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:41 pm
Location: Cologne
Contact:

Post by raiden »

So should one buy both then?
yes, if only to find out which one you prefer.

my choice is part II, in just about every way except maybe for the music. My biggest gripe with part I is the P51´s charge shot which I consider overpowered, as it helps you to clear every dangerous boss pattern without effort, and the stages aren´t that challenging by themselves.
Strikers 1945 II has a much better balance imo, for every special ability a plane has it comes with a weekness to make up for it. For example, the Pancake is incredibly useful for certain boss attacks, but its main shot is the weakest one.
I´ve had a lot of fun with part I, too, but once I got part II, I had no wish of going back. And that´s completely different with part III, just to mention it. III is a nice game, medal chaining and technical bonus being the main attractions, but I don´t consider the level design even remotely as polished as that of II.
User avatar
mannerbot
Posts: 1158
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:07 pm
Location: California

Post by mannerbot »

raiden wrote:my choice is part II, in just about every way except maybe for the music. My biggest gripe with part I is the P51´s charge shot which I consider overpowered, as it helps you to clear every dangerous boss pattern without effort, and the stages aren´t that challenging by themselves.
The P51 is the Mustang right? Well, I think the fact that it's a complete piece of crap and has ridiculous charge-up time on the special shot balances things out. :P
User avatar
it290
Posts: 2544
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:00 am
Location: polar malortex, illinois

Post by it290 »

Yeah, that charge shot isn't going to save your ass for long if you rely on it to block bullets all the time.
User avatar
raiden
Posts: 862
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:41 pm
Location: Cologne
Contact:

Post by raiden »

Yeah, that charge shot isn't going to save your ass for long if you rely on it to block bullets all the time.
of course, but I don´t need to block bullets all the time. There are only a few really dangerous, hard to dodge boss attacks, and once you know them, it´s easy to reserve the charge shot for them and charge it in time.
User avatar
SPACE HARRIER
Posts: 186
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 7:46 pm
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Post by SPACE HARRIER »

HEY,what about STRIKERS 1945 PLUS for the NEO-GEO!! :idea:

ImageImage

I still like the first one more....hahahaaa!! CHEERS :wink:
Image = = = = = = =
Post Reply