I used to be a huuuuuuge procrastinator.Ruldra wrote:When procrastination gets the better of me yet again.
it just takes a lot of self-discipline, and years of effort
I used to be a huuuuuuge procrastinator.Ruldra wrote:When procrastination gets the better of me yet again.
GaijinPunch wrote:Ketsui with suction cup.
I don't think I quite follow you D:Despatche wrote:when you do something in the past only to do something in the future that is inconsistent with that past thing
GaijinPunch wrote:Ketsui with suction cup.
y'know laminate archtops are made of laminate for a reason.Never_Scurred wrote:I'm annoyed that eating poorly (ie. pizza and taco bell) has become much more convenient, preferable, and (slightly) cheaper for me than buying groceries
I'm annoyed that I spend an hour a day practicing guitar but spend nearly three times that fantasizing about guitars I want
I'm annoyed that there are no American-made arch-top guitars cheaper than $3000
I'm annoyed that a $2500 all wood, hand-carved arch-top from China is cheaper than an American made all-laminate one
I'm annoyed that middle-aged white men have set the agenda for guitars and isn't set to change anytime soon
I'm annoyed that my professor neglects to inform his students that he won't be showing up to class, especially on cold ass mornings like today
GaijinPunch wrote:Ketsui with suction cup.
As for the laminate thing....I understand it's done to reduce feedback, but why are they so fuckin' expensive? I never understood how Gibson could charge $3500 for the ES-175, when everyone knows you could just spend $500 to mod out the Epiphone 175 with Gibson pups and parts, and pretty much have the same damn guitar with $$$$$$$ to spare. I'm looking at the Artcores from Ibanez.moh wrote:y'know laminate archtops are made of laminate for a reason.Never_Scurred wrote:I'm annoyed that eating poorly (ie. pizza and taco bell) has become much more convenient, preferable, and (slightly) cheaper for me than buying groceries
I'm annoyed that I spend an hour a day practicing guitar but spend nearly three times that fantasizing about guitars I want
I'm annoyed that there are no American-made arch-top guitars cheaper than $3000
I'm annoyed that a $2500 all wood, hand-carved arch-top from China is cheaper than an American made all-laminate one
I'm annoyed that middle-aged white men have set the agenda for guitars and isn't set to change anytime soon
I'm annoyed that my professor neglects to inform his students that he won't be showing up to class, especially on cold ass mornings like today
If im ever buying another electric, it'll be an all laminate jazz-box.
the characteristic tones of an archtop are not those of an astoundingly resonant guitar, but rather a mellow, perhaps duller (for lack of a better word) tone. that's what gives jazz guitar its mellowness, the lack of resonance! =P
and another word of advice, american guitars are not automatically amazing guitars.. gibson and fender are very overpriced guitars because they have a legacy name. the really old fenders/gibsons are great, but both of those companies have been under new management for the past decade, and their quality has unfortunately gone down. Some of the best guitars I have ever played have been japanese (yamaha), korean (cort), german (warwick) and australian (cole clark).
but to each his own! And best of luck with your guitar journey =]
GaijinPunch wrote:Ketsui with suction cup.
The distinction is that "thou" isn't used any more...because it's annoying.Stormwatch wrote:I'm annoyed by the loss of distinction between 'thou' and 'you'.
moozooh wrote:I think that approach won't get you far in Garegga.
yeah, they're amazing! but get ready to fork over the cash. they're the neo-geo of guitars =PEaglet wrote:If ya want resonance you should try out an old ES-135 pre-60s.
Amazing sounding guitar. Works great for teh rawks too.
It's from sonic wings 2 for the neo geo. He's a playable character named whity, ISNT HE SUCH A CUTIE?ancestral-knowledge wrote:I love your avatar moh! Where is it from?
GaijinPunch wrote:Ketsui with suction cup.
moozooh wrote:I think that approach won't get you far in Garegga.
Put fish in you mouth.moh wrote:ISNT HE SUCH A CUTIE?
But other languages have "you singular" and "you plural". It's too weird that English lacks that... other than not-universally-accepted forms like "youse", "yous", "y'all". Which are a plural on top of something that was a plural in the first place!Ed Oscuro wrote:The distinction is that "thou" isn't used any more...because it's annoying.Stormwatch wrote:I'm annoyed by the loss of distinction between 'thou' and 'you'.
English only had a singular/plural distinction back in Old English, which also had dual pronouns everywhere and was a very different beast (it's the English of Beowulf and pretty much unreadable if you don't know the language). As soon as the fairly recognizable Middle English hit, thou/you was an informal/formal distinction, and while a lot of languages do have a T-V distinction like that (it's possibly more widespread than having separate second person plural pronouns too), I'm quite happy it went away from English personallyStormwatch wrote:But other languages have "you singular" and "you plural". It's too weird that English lacks that... other than not-universally-accepted forms like "youse", "yous", "y'all". Which are a plural on top of something that was a plural in the first place!
You know what's actually annoying?Stormwatch wrote:But other languages have "you singular" and "you plural". It's too weird that English lacks that... other than not-universally-accepted forms like "youse", "yous", "y'all". Which are a plural on top of something that was a plural in the first place!Ed Oscuro wrote:The distinction is that "thou" isn't used any more...because it's annoying.Stormwatch wrote:I'm annoyed by the loss of distinction between 'thou' and 'you'.
That kind of use is fine, but it doesn't really work for particular individuals of unspecified gender: "Pat should take their car to the mechanic" sounds like you're talking about someone else's car, not Pat's car.Ed Oscuro wrote:You know what's actually annoying?
Trying to use "their" as a gender-neutral possessive and getting bashed for it!
"Eche of theym sholde ... make theymselfe redy." (c. 1489)
That would be a problem for a dumb writer, I suppose.Ex-Cyber wrote:That kind of use is fine, but it doesn't really work for particular individuals of unspecified gender: "Pat should take their car to the mechanic" sounds like you're talking about someone else's car, not Pat's car.Ed Oscuro wrote:You know what's actually annoying?
Trying to use "their" as a gender-neutral possessive and getting bashed for it!
"Eche of theym sholde ... make theymselfe redy." (c. 1489)