As evidence the doomsday clock ticks ever closer to midnight, the QAnon Shaman's lawyer is actually going with the Idiocracy defence for the Capitol rioters.

A bold strategy which, if it pays off, could well end all human life on this planet.
And at the same time being all about pro life, right? Makes sense to me, you ding-dong.orange808 wrote:These right wing cunts would drown every spectrum child (outside of some high functioning Asperger's) in the river at birth if they could.
RegalSin wrote:Street Fighters. We need to aviod them when we activate time accellerator.
Using on hand resources to construct a mOon base and deploy probes and such from there makes sense, as the vastly lower gravity makes for a cheaper escape velocity. Just need AI to be at the threshold to automate such an endeavor.orange808 wrote:I'm not worried about the time frame. You're already thinking long term when you consider running out of fossil fuels, so considering mining materials from the moon isn't really behind the scope of the conversation. (It is probably beyond our lifetimes--at least comfortably beyond our primes.) Given the amount of power we can harvest and the extreme cost of future rare fossil fuels, the economics could become viable very quickly.
Yep. I can't understand any of it.emphatic wrote:And at the same time being all about pro life, right? Makes sense to me, you ding-dong.orange808 wrote:These right wing cunts would drown every spectrum child (outside of some high functioning Asperger's) in the river at birth if they could.
I would automate the process. Shouldn't have to send any people to the moon. Maintaining a presence in orbit would be good, though. First order of business is cleaning up the trash in orbit. Can't have things coming and going with this mess.BryanM wrote:I watched a thing the other day, and am actually amazed at how shitty Britney Spears was treated by the media. It was easy to miss if you didn't watch TV all day, but when the bits are all put together back to back it's monstrous. Her character went from naive Christian country belle being exploited by skeevy music studios as a kid, to "crazy white trash bitch". Sarah Silverman calling her children "mistakes" at a roast is a bit low, but a Family Feud question that bullies her? Good lord. Leave Britney alone, indeed.
At least Melinda Gates is divorcing her husband, so he'll face a teeny tiny consequence for his "relationship" with Epstein. Instead of having all of the money, he'll only have around half of all of the money. Isn't that great?! ...Isn't it??!?!
Using on hand resources to construct a mOon base and deploy probes and such from there makes sense, as the vastly lower gravity makes for a cheaper escape velocity. Just need AI to be at the threshold to automate such an endeavor.orange808 wrote:I'm not worried about the time frame. You're already thinking long term when you consider running out of fossil fuels, so considering mining materials from the moon isn't really behind the scope of the conversation. (It is probably beyond our lifetimes--at least comfortably beyond our primes.) Given the amount of power we can harvest and the extreme cost of future rare fossil fuels, the economics could become viable very quickly.
Bringing stuff into earth, well... I suppose if we had such a base we could dump the stuff into our oceans. And not have it be a hyper over the top luxury only for the absolute peak of society, such as the material to build steel toilets for the planet's emperor and such. All without needing a magical space elevator.
While talking about loooOOoooong timeframes: heat death of the universe. Hydrogen had to come from somewhere somehow. Maybe it's not completely, totally impossible that the universe isn't a closed system.
^^^^^^^^BryanM wrote:Urgh, there's literally only around 4 democrats in congress raising a hand against the apartheid, and yet there are partisans who want to pretend it's only Republicans who are evil.
How many Republicans in congress are raising a hand against apartheid?FinalBaton wrote:^^^^^^^^BryanM wrote:Urgh, there's literally only around 4 democrats in congress raising a hand against the apartheid, and yet there are partisans who want to pretend it's only Republicans who are evil.
This x1000
It means stop letting Republicans off the hook. Nobody is "supposed to be" evil.FinalBaton wrote:Does that mean you should be satisfied with this Democratic party?
Does this mean you shouldn't ask for the Democratic party to be better? (considerably better actually)
They'd have nothing if you take that away. As in "driven to despair, no reason to go on living" nothing.orange808 wrote:I'm tired of the entire idea of the magic books, apocalypse, prophesies, and "chosen ones" You aren't fucking special and your made up magic ghost story is a sham. That's all of you.
Why obsess on that particular conflict? There's significantly worse perpetual violence on the entire African continent to the south.Mischief Maker wrote:If you think the Israeli raid of the al-Aqsa Mosque that set this whole thing off had anything to do with religion, and not with Netanyahu's failure to form a governing coalition less than a week before, I've got a bridge to sell you.
And if you think the SECOND Israeli storming of al-Aqsa mosque shortly after the ceasefire was declared was about religion, Lucy here would like you to kick the football she's holding.
With his Prime Ministership in peril, and the corruption trial against him picking up steam, Netanyahu has every reason to provoke Hamas and turn himself into super war-man protecting the people from the scary terrorists, nevermind his criminality in a time of crisis.
I used to be a hardcore atheist type, but I softened on the issue because of Christopher Hitchens, ironically enough. It was after he decided the Iraq War 2.0 was some kind of Atheist Jihad of Thomas Jefferson verses the New Age Preacher who talked his mother into a murder-suicide pact. Watching Hitchens twist himself into logical pretzels to excuse Cheney's oil-grab in the same way "Intelligent Design" advocates tried to sell Noah's Ark as scientifically sound made me realize the irrational thought processes I'd associated with right-wing evangelicalism when I was younger were not exclusive to religion at all.
I thought YOU were the one who brought it up with your talk about being sick of holy books and apocalypse.orange808 wrote:Why obsess on that particular conflict?
I won't ask you to discuss it, but out of curiosity which one?orange808 wrote:Believe it or not, you touched on one subject I won't discuss. I'm not that brave. It's amazing how many conflicts (past and present) are verboten.
It's literally the name of the thread, but my opinion isn't new.Mischief Maker wrote:I thought YOU were the one who brought it up with your talk about being sick of holy books and apocalypse.orange808 wrote:Why obsess on that particular conflict?
Nope.Mischief Maker wrote:I won't ask you to discuss it, but out of curiosity which one?orange808 wrote:Believe it or not, you touched on one subject I won't discuss. I'm not that brave. It's amazing how many conflicts (past and present) are verboten.
Yes.. but... Nobody around the west was ever cancelled for spinning "Give Me Hope, Johanna".Mischief Maker wrote:*shrug*
The nation state of Israel is not Judaism and the politician Netanyahu is not the personification of all Jews worldwide.
If Apartheid was wrong in South Africa it's wrong in Israel too.
Well maybe if you promised to spend your stimulus cheques on state of the art radar systems, anti-personnel weapons and automatically renewable 5-year Northrup Grumman and Raytheon premium support contracts, government-senpai would notice you. You have to put out a bit to get the boys’ attention, you know.BryanM wrote:Yeah... like I said before I'd call it a win if we could get two checks from them this year, which I guess is a higher bar than I had for the republicans (which was "please god put off the Iran war for later).
The Bipartisanship Fairy is totally real, and we must continue to placate her with sacrifice! Never, ever lose faith!EmperorIng wrote:Glad to see our lad is sticking to his guns
I mean, it's real in the sense that the military industrial complex give both parties marching orders. With things winding down in Iraq & Afghanistan, sliding a couple $bil to a military client state helps make up some of the shortfall.BulletMagnet wrote:The Bipartisanship Fairy is totally real, and we must continue to placate her with sacrifice! Never, ever lose faith!