
I remember The Evil Dead 2 being the "trippy" one. Anyone think the first is worth seeing on the big screen? I barely remember it.
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
I'm going to be unpopular for saying this, but the first one is only worth watching once to set the premise for 2 and Army of Darkness. The first movie was a director making the best of a miniscule budget, 2 & 3 were full-blown parodies of the first. 1 doesn't deserve repeat viewing.GaijinPunch wrote:I remember The Evil Dead 2 being the "trippy" one. Anyone think the first is worth seeing on the big screen? I barely remember it.
That high fever must have taken its toll Mike, The World's End is such a smartly concocted commentary on capitalism and workforce slavery, it's another example of Edgar Wright's underrated talent.MX7 wrote: Watched The World's End last night with a high fever. One of the smuggest, most unpleasantly awful films I've ever say through. Simon Pegg is possibly my least favourite people in the world. Still the central premise was pretty compelling I guess. Just head punchingly poorly executed.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
MX7 wrote:Always makes me laugh when people say Evil Dead 1 had a 'miniscule' budget. For a mainstream Hollywood film maybe. Christ I wonder how many films Koji Wakamatsu could make for $350k
Well the World's End is definitely in that territory if you deconstruct it - although I actually agree that Wright and Co. certainly went for a very obvious (or blunt as you put it) metaphor piece. Do I think that detracts from the movie as a satire? Not really. There is an argument that veiling a subtext in film can either make something more impressive or worse, depending on how you achieve or fail at striking the balance. On the flip side there are too many movies that lose their grip on their intended metaphor and subtexts by obfuscating to such a degree that any potential value is all but lost. The World's End certainly doesn't have that problem, and I wouldn't expect the Spaced guys to be tripping into true arthouse any time soon anyway (although arguably, if all facets of film are an art form - and they are - then Wright is more of an artist than most Hollywood buffoons).MX7 wrote:I'm a sucker for anything that explores Baudrillardian notions of simulacra
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
There's an interesting scrapped storyboard about that - CTRL+F Naulsoptions wrote:(but what happened to Nauls?)
Most likely because Ebert was an incredibly overrated movie critic who knew very little indeed about film.Mischief Maker wrote:the only reason I can fathom for why Ebert gave it thumbs up
Well, yes, I can kind of see this as an irritant. Although honestly there's a lot of Robocop that's genuinely blackly funny, and brilliantly so - but certainly not the scenes of raw violence. I'd find myself irked by the super nerd village in attendance if they couldn't can it for dramatic scenes.Tregard wrote: It was a screening of Robocop that soured things for me. If you'd only heard the crowd you'd think it was a screening of Anchorman or something. Endless whooping and laughing the whole way through, even during the nastier bits of violence. And why? Because it's a satire! Didn't you know? If you're not laughing then you're not in on the joke and clearly don't have the right film-buff creds. Hence: every motherfucker in the place going red in the face trying to out-laugh their nerd rivals.
I think Troll 2 is meant to be hilarious (ly bad)Tregard wrote:Same shit happened with Troll 2. That was the final straw.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
Just got done watching that...the acting was incredibly bad xD its only saving grace was Lance henrikson but everything about the movie was bad even the special effects were terrible its irritating there is alot of plotholes and none of the characters are likeable I'm shocked because they had alot of potential with the whole boat and terrifying alien creature on a massive ship.system11 wrote:Just watched Harbinger Down - it's no 'The Thing', but it's not too bad.
RegalSin wrote:America also needs less Pale and Char Coal looking people and more Tan skinned people since tthis will eliminate the diffrence between dark and light.
Where could I E-mail or mail to if I want to address my ideas and Opinions?
Miami ConnectionSatan wrote:Wow. That was a level of bad I have never experienced before. Thanks for that, I hadn't heard of Miami Connection.
I really like this one, too! It's really, really well-written, and plays games with you the entire way through. *Yes*, it goes too far in some places, but it's still plenty of fun.kaicooper wrote:The Game 1997..such an amazing movie
Yeah Troll 2 was genuinely funny, but again it was taken overboard by the audience, many of whom had clearly seen it several times before as they were quoting it throughout.Skykid wrote:I think Troll 2 is meant to be hilarious (ly bad)Tregard wrote:Same shit happened with Troll 2. That was the final straw.
What are you doing? You can't sum up its positives and negatives. It's negatives ARE its positives.kaicooper wrote: Miami Connection
BAD acting
BAD plot
BAD Direction
but
Awesom Fights
AMAZING soundtracks
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
To properly set the context for a Troll 2 screening, you must watch the (excellent) documentary Best Worst Movie.Tregard wrote:Yeah Troll 2 was genuinely funny, but again it was taken overboard by the audience, many of whom had clearly seen it several times before as they were quoting it throughout.Skykid wrote:I think Troll 2 is meant to be hilarious (ly bad)Tregard wrote:Same shit happened with Troll 2. That was the final straw.
"You don't piss on hospitality!" was a good line, but it pretty much got a standing ovation in there. Made me realise I'd be having much more fun watching it at home with a few mates, some pizza and a crate of beers.
They showed it immediately afterwards, and I think I enjoyed it more than the film. Was fascinating to see the lives of these various amateur actors and their reaction to inadvertently becoming cult stars years after the film was made. Some of it was quite tragic - I was quite moved by the older guy's sad reflections on how he "frittered his whole life away". Of course the audience seemed to find this hilarious too.Mischief Maker wrote: To properly set the context for a Troll 2 screening, you must watch the (excellent) documentary Best Worst Movie.
If you liked that doc, check out Anvil! The story of AnvilTregard wrote:They showed it immediately afterwards, and I think I enjoyed it more than the film. Was fascinating to see the lives of these various amateur actors and their reaction to inadvertently becoming cult stars years after the film was made. Some of it was quite tragic - I was quite moved by the older guy's sad reflections on how he "frittered his whole life away". Of course the audience seemed to find this hilarious too.Mischief Maker wrote: To properly set the context for a Troll 2 screening, you must watch the (excellent) documentary Best Worst Movie.
I've seen that too, at the Prince Charles Cinema. Loved it, ended up buying "This is 13" because of it. THIS IS THIRTEEEEEEEEEEN!! \m/Mischief Maker wrote:If you liked that doc, check out Anvil! The story of Anvil
Wong Kar-Wai is excellent most of the time. You should check out Chung-King Express, it's one of my favorite movies.chempop wrote:Fallen Angels http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0112913/
Never seen anything quite like it. I’m not entirely sure what I think.
Maybe Skykid can tell me if I should like it, or if it’s any good.
RegalSin wrote:Street Fighters. We need to aviod them when we activate time accellerator.