guess we'll have to take that as a "no"Gunstar wrote:@maxtherabbit - I sent two emails to RGC asking about the use of attenuator networks in their DC cable and unfortunately haven't heard back.

guess we'll have to take that as a "no"Gunstar wrote:@maxtherabbit - I sent two emails to RGC asking about the use of attenuator networks in their DC cable and unfortunately haven't heard back.
Is there any improvements to the picture quality and/or audio over the standard scart head/hood?Gara wrote:https://retro-access.com/products/taske ... ug-upgrade
The metal hood makes for a nice upgrade. Not much practical value but it looks nice.
With a fully-shielded cable, I can't imagine the 1cm or so of exposed cable between the shielding and the SCART connector really getting much interference. I think a metal hood, if connected to the shielding and outer portion of the connector, would literally shield that bit of the exposed cable, but not to any tangible benefit.Lawfer wrote:Is there any improvements to the picture quality and/or audio over the standard scart head/hood?Gara wrote:https://retro-access.com/products/taske ... ug-upgrade
The metal hood makes for a nice upgrade. Not much practical value but it looks nice.
Spoiler
Theoretically I imagine there is some benefit to a tiny amount of extra shielding. I doubt there is any real world benefit. I buy them for the look and build quality. They discontinued the old metal plated version. I'm just glad there is a an alternative to the standard head.Lawfer wrote:
Is there any improvements to the picture quality and/or audio over the standard scart head/hood?
Same. I like the look of the metallic SCART head. I have a bunch of the old style. So the few new cables I buy I get the new version.Gara wrote:Theoretically I imagine there is some benefit to a tiny amount of extra shielding. I doubt there is any real world benefit. I buy them for the look and build quality. They discontinued the old metal plated version. I'm just glad there is a an alternative to the standard head.Lawfer wrote:
Is there any improvements to the picture quality and/or audio over the standard scart head/hood?
Got the Retro gaming cables uk cable on Friday and can also confirm that the image looks darker than the image of my Beharbos Gekko Box. I would not say it looks uglier just different. Not sad about the purchase though, the cable is the best way for me to into upscaling over Scart with the Framemeister. It looks better than connection the gekko to the Framemeister.ldeveraux wrote:Awesome, this is exactly what I was hoping for! Going to test mine out as well!KonradKlaus wrote:I was going Dreamcast -> Toro -> GscartSW -> OSSC -> Panasonic plasma. I had a hard time getting the VGA to work with the toro into the OSSC, but scart would work... it'd just go in and out every now and then or if, heaven forbid, a strong breeze or my daughter slightly moving either the dream cast, the scart cable, or the toro box it'd have no sync and I'd meticulously jiggle things till it work right. I have a feeling it was the connector from the DC to the toro... but unsure.the Goat wrote: What type of display are you connecting to?
Now with the retro-access cable it seems pretty reliable.
EDIT: Eek, I tried out the SCART cable and it doesn't look as clean or bright as my current cable, the Hyperkin HDMI. I think I just wasted $50...
I've noticed it too.Revolver Ocelot wrote:Got the Retro gaming cables uk cable on Friday and can also confirm that the image looks darker than the image of my Beharbos Gekko Box. I would not say it looks uglier just different. Not sad about the purchase though, the cable is the best way for me to into upscaling over Scart with the Framemeister. It looks better than connection the gekko to the Framemeister.
Does this mean that the digital out of the DCHDMI looks darker too?maxtherabbit wrote:"darker" is exactly how it's meant to look - the console's DAC was overdriving brightness from the word go
Yesfernan1234 wrote:Does this mean that the digital out of the DCHDMI looks darker too?maxtherabbit wrote:"darker" is exactly how it's meant to look - the console's DAC was overdriving brightness from the word go
These are CRTs, so why not get a BNC or SCART Dreamcast cable from Retro-Access?OleMacDonald wrote:What is the best cable to use to get the best possible video quality on a PVM (I have a Sony Trinitron 20L2MD and a 14N6U)and/or a Trinitron CRT 36FS200?
+1Lawfer wrote:These are CRTs, so why not get a BNC Dreamcast cable from Retro-Access?OleMacDonald wrote:What is the best cable to use to get the best possible video quality on a PVM (I have a Sony Trinitron 20L2MD and a 14N6U)and/or a Trinitron CRT 36FS200?
Thanks! I had been looking at those but wanted to make sure that I was getting the best one possible. Is there a difference between the video quality of dreamcast BNC cable and a Dreamcast Scart cable? Also, is there a difference between the RGC Packapunch RGB 480p scart and the Retro-Access Scart other than the ability on Retro-Access to toggle 15khz/31khz (I think the PVM i have is 15)?Lawfer wrote:These are CRTs, so why not get a BNC or SCART Dreamcast cable from Retro-Access?OleMacDonald wrote:What is the best cable to use to get the best possible video quality on a PVM (I have a Sony Trinitron 20L2MD and a 14N6U)and/or a Trinitron CRT 36FS200?
Well it depends what you want to connect it to? If you want to connect your Dreamcast directly to a proffessional monitor like a PVM, then get the BNC cable, if you are in Europe and you want to connect it directly to a CRT TV to get 480i RGB, then get the SCART one, if you want to connect to an OSSC, then get the SCART one etc...OleMacDonald wrote:Thanks! I had been looking at those but wanted to make sure that I was getting the best one possible. Is there a difference between the video quality of dreamcast BNC cable and a Dreamcast Scart cable?
No idea, I know that the one from Retro-Access fixes the issue with the Dreamcast's video levels being overblown (which is something I have been waiting for) and offer BNC cables which Retro Gaming Cables does not, Retro-Access also offer custom options which Retro Gaming Cables does not (they used to, but they stopped offering custom options years ago), also Retro-Access coaxial cables uses thicker wires that are 75 Ohm:OleMacDonald wrote:Also, is there a difference between the RGC Packapunch RGB 480p scart and the Retro-Access Scart other than the ability on Retro-Access to toggle 15khz/31khz (I think the PVM i have is 15)?
https://www.retrogamingcables.co.uk/SEG ... 3fb4c077bb
https://retro-access.com/products/dream ... 7667?aff=3
Will you be offering Fortraflex on more than just SNES and Genesis cables? Will custom Fortraflex cables become an option as well?dseleski wrote:Just jumping in here to state that the Fortraflex are not 75 ohm impedance rated - in cable or on the RGB lines (we added those networks late in development to coax only), Fortraflex being a more budget solution that we started offering this year with almost as much shielding as coax. This being the same method of shielding used in official cables which are never more than 6ft long, we maxed them out at 6ft to avoid any issues and they test fine at that length.
I’m not sure about that 90% figure though because from the amount of Scart to scarts and other hookups we sell it does seem like most people aren’t using direct hookups (I guess if you can afford one screen per console, you probably will be doing.)
I do wish people would buy more Fortraflex though because it’s faster to wire up and I can delegate this work.
So yes if you have a direct hookup and no plan to expand - please by all means do purchase Fortraflex.
To answer your question, I have the new gscartsw, not the old one.Fudoh wrote:@OleMacDonald: which version of the GScartSW do you own?
Since you don't require any 480p, your best choice would indeed be a Scart cable to connect to the switch. And output from there just as you would with any other system (you have other systems connected, right?).
Main difference between the Retro Access and the RCG cable are the fixed serration pulses on the Retro Access one. This fixes 480p on some PVM/BVMs, which would otherwise require an additional Extron interface.
We’ll be offering more Fortraflex when we can upgrade to SLS batch printing - the cables take less time to make, ergo more can be produced, but the sheer amount of stuff we offer would outdo what I can produce on a double extruder FDM. So this is a pending job, basically. In other words:Taiyaki wrote:Will you be offering Fortraflex on more than just SNES and Genesis cables? Will custom Fortraflex cables become an option as well?dseleski wrote:Just jumping in here to state that the Fortraflex are not 75 ohm impedance rated - in cable or on the RGB lines (we added those networks late in development to coax only), Fortraflex being a more budget solution that we started offering this year with almost as much shielding as coax. This being the same method of shielding used in official cables which are never more than 6ft long, we maxed them out at 6ft to avoid any issues and they test fine at that length.
I’m not sure about that 90% figure though because from the amount of Scart to scarts and other hookups we sell it does seem like most people aren’t using direct hookups (I guess if you can afford one screen per console, you probably will be doing.)
I do wish people would buy more Fortraflex though because it’s faster to wire up and I can delegate this work.
So yes if you have a direct hookup and no plan to expand - please by all means do purchase Fortraflex.
I see you're offering a 2 month return for those who just recently bought the coax and wish to exchange. I don't suppose I could trade in the Snes and Genesis ones I ordered and received in early March? This was almost 3 months ago so I'm outside of that deadline, but they have received no use beyond just testing. Reason I haven't been using them is that I was waiting for SuperG's latest batch of scart switch box to ship, and I just received it a few days ago (I haven't even gotten around to hooking it up). I wouldn't even mind returning them for a simple discount on buying them again made with Fortraflex, as I much prefer the flexibility they offer over the rigidness of coax.
thanks for nothing!Taiyaki wrote:Bumping the thread since it was on the verge of being sent to page 3.
Sorry about that.ldeveraux wrote:thanks for nothing!Taiyaki wrote:Bumping the thread since it was on the verge of being sent to page 3.