Nothing that didn't happen on a daily basis, at least.drauch wrote:Banned from Off Topic. You didn't see anything because there wasn't anything to see.

Nothing that didn't happen on a daily basis, at least.drauch wrote:Banned from Off Topic. You didn't see anything because there wasn't anything to see.
BryanM wrote:You're trapped in a haunted house. There's a ghost. It wants to eat your friends and have sex with your cat. When forced to decide between the lives of your friends and the chastity of your kitty, you choose the cat.
BryanM wrote:You're trapped in a haunted house. There's a ghost. It wants to eat your friends and have sex with your cat. When forced to decide between the lives of your friends and the chastity of your kitty, you choose the cat.
I read this and I was like "BIL owes DTP enterprises for pro strats?!?!?"BIL wrote:Cock sucking mother fucking muppets at DWP
There's your problem, mate.MOSQUITO FIGHTER wrote:Windows phone.
BryanM wrote:You're trapped in a haunted house. There's a ghost. It wants to eat your friends and have sex with your cat. When forced to decide between the lives of your friends and the chastity of your kitty, you choose the cat.
It seems like it used to be a lot better. Other annoyances are not being able to rotate the phone when doing a Bing search with the new Cortana front end. And everytime I adjust the volume the bar takes up like 1/3 of the screen blocking what I'm trying to look at.Lord Satori wrote:There's your problem, mate.MOSQUITO FIGHTER wrote:Windows phone.
There are manga with stuff in it you can't unsee, stuff that would probably get their authors arrested in most countries you know... but you probably haven't heard of those.Lord Satori wrote:I'm hardly phased by anything that happens in manga
yeah stuff like that, not human, just live meat.Satan wrote:'the resource.'
Strikers1945guy wrote:"Do we....eat chicken balls?!"
To middle management and up they absolutely are; the rest of the world exists only to further enrich their bottom line, and should be tearfully grateful for the opportunity.BareKnuckleRoo wrote:People aren't resources like bushels of wheat or whatever.
This to me is the worst part of the job search. I saw a career counselor the other day and was going over a failed job interview and her advice that really stung was, "You might not want to let them in on the fact that you're going to night school. Employers don't like to think that they aren't the number one priority in your life."BulletMagnet wrote:To middle management and up they absolutely are; the rest of the world exists only to further enrich their bottom line, and should be tearfully grateful for the opportunity.
Hey now, don't start trolling the annoyances threadIron Peach wrote:Either the fork or the spoon is a far better tech, Sir.
RegalSin wrote:Then again sex is no diffrent then sticking a stick down some hole to make a female womenly or girl scream or make noise.
But it's the workers who have such a crippling problem with "entitlement".Mischief Maker wrote:Employers don't like to think that they aren't the number one priority in your life.
You, job seekers, are apparently all seeking jobs out of the kindness of your hearts, out of a desire to be industrious and assist companies in their pursuits. You are certainly not interested in what kind of compensation you will receive for your work.
This is ridiculous.
Penalizing job seekers for inquiring about something so central to why they’d take the job in the first place betrays a serious lack of common sense, as well as something disgustingly arrogant — as if job seekers should simply be grateful to have been granted an audience with an employer and shouldn’t jeopardize that by anything so vulgar as acknowledging that they’ll be working for money.
This, from a card-carrying member of an executive class which has, for several decades running, gone all-in on the Ayn Randian, scorched-earth "greed is good" trollop, which states unequivocally that short-term, personal enrichment should be the only motivating factor for anybody to do anything, and that the faintest trace of moral/ethical quandaries or passing concern for other affected parties only messes the whole system up and must be mercilessly purged from the conversation. Now, it seems, they've added an amendment without telling us: that whole self-righteous spiel applies only to them, as we commoners are still required to exhibit a downright philanthropic mindset when it comes to the expending of our labor, at least when its fruits are destined for a higher rung on the ladder.If you ask about salary in the first interview, “it makes you look as though you’re applying for the job because of the money. That [can] seem too mercenary.”
RegalSin wrote:Then again sex is no diffrent then sticking a stick down some hole to make a female womenly or girl scream or make noise.
Strikers1945guy wrote:"Do we....eat chicken balls?!"