Raytrace wrote:While talking about things you recommend it is fairly difficult to NEVER reference things you don't -
Practice makes perfect. If you guys would at least try...
Also in a thread about recommended anime and manga, I think it is fair enough to question what is usually recommended.
Or do you want this thread to literally be a list of titles with reviews?
I'd like to, but I cannot force you gentlemen to use your willpower to be constructive, rather than post endless drivel about the childhood you will never get back, and the mainstream that will never accept you as being a cool cat. This has been a problem of half of the threads on this forum since 2000 at least, but the last 2-3 years have been obnoxious. I have nothing against your posts, of course, but the whinging really grates on my nerves, in the long distance.
Anyhow, I am going off-topic. Since nobody really gives a shit of being on-topic and feels authorized to rant endlessly, once at least one person starts the "heroin crackheads whinging session online" (with free fisting!), I'll write down my two cents, too. Eugenics comes for free, as usual.
On to other posts:
Drauch wrote:The pre-2000 anime fan didn't have access to anime? What?
There are loads of anime that were on VHS, Laser Disc, and even DVD before that point
And that was a small market for dedicated fans, rather than a big market of shows displayed on tv. France has a generation could "Albator generation" (Daft Punk's age, roughly), because of the influence of Matsumoto's anime on then-children, stemming from an anime shown on
free tv. When masses get good products for free, chances are that their average taste improves, for the most part. In fact you point out the problem in your post, which I do not quote again to keep my post short and readable. After all: HBO is not free, is it?
GP wrote: was recommending Megazone23 and illustrating in basically a single sentence its detachment of just about all anime... Not just modern.
Time to get really snarky: this one?
GP wrote:So yeah... what the fuck happened to the industry from the 90's on? Worth another thread.
My answer to your question, once more (like, fourth time in 2 years?): usual japanese approach to production, shrinking market, aging demographics, conservative approach to themes and tropes to be used in anime,... created a market in which well-written (good lines, decent characterization, proper plots) but not
intellectually challenging stories could flourish, and garbage would slowly but steadily increase in percentage (and lolis would triumph).
In other words, it's Japan going down the drain, the factor that is at fault here. Anime held well, but at a certain price: do not expect a new
Ashita no Joe (class 1968, btw: smart animes died in
70s, to be honest), any time soon. And even in the '80s, good, intelligent,
stimulating plots were not safe from the pit-falls of public stupidity: how much
Honneamise bombed, thanks to its remarkably well-thought plot, intelligent topics and original settings? Why
Megazone 23 became an OVA, as the sponsors retired the funding mid-season, when it had a great & innovative plot? What factors saved
Akira and
Ghost, instead? Etc.
In general, I do not see how CG or lack of mechas in space (i.e the shallow eye-candy) are a big issue, when plots lost bite at least 20 years ago, with some good exceptions (
Kenshin and its portrayal of the Meiji era). Authors do not dare much these days and, if they do, they usually tend to do it in a pretentious way:
Evangelion, but also
Ergo Proxy, and so on.
Oh, and lest I forget: for those of you who lament the demise of good sci-fi in anime...good sci-fi has been in bad shape for a while now, even at - no,
especially at - a literary level. Once more, anime is following general trends, unsurprisingly enough. Please remind me a good sci-fi tv show, or a good sci-fi movie (aside
Prometheus of course).
"The only desire the Culture could not satisfy from within itself was one common to both the descendants of its original human stock and the machines [...]: the urge not to feel useless."
I.M. Banks, "Consider Phlebas" (1988: 43).