Nerdcore: Should Deckard be a replicant in Blade Runner?

A place where you can chat about anything that isn't to do with games!
User avatar
CMoon
Posts: 6207
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:28 pm

Re: Nerdcore: Should Deckard be a replicant in Blade Runner?

Post by CMoon »

Unfortunately it doesn't really change the point that (at least for me) the story works better with Deckard as a human, and it seems like Scott didn't actually see that (again, my questioning of him as a director.) And yeah, I hate twist endings. They tend to turn films into a 1 to 2 viewings affair. If you can watch and enjoy 6th sense a second time, good for you.

My issue with Deckard being a replicant as a twist, is that it doesn't bring anything to the table. Deckard is still the same morose cop with the same shitty job he had before. Perhaps if it had been explored in some other way, like show the whole series of Deckard's they had been using to fight the wave of replicants, or whatever. Something to make it a major theme instead of a trivial nerd-gasm. The problem is how this transforms BR into a radically different film, maybe a great film, but not the film Blade Runner is.

I also think introducing the Deckard-as-replicant theme makes the film guilty of shoe-horning too much into a single movie--like how Django Unchained tried to out-do everything ever done in a spaghetti western and blaxploitation film, all in one movie. Instead of additional layers of complexity, it just becomes a mess.

So to me the question of what Scott really intended here is sort of irrelevant; I'm more interested in MM's original point about the artistic merit of both views, and why people prefer one reading over the other.
Randorama wrote:ban CMoon for being a closet Jerry Falwell cockmonster/Ann Coulter fan, Nijska a bronie (ack! The horror!), and Ed Oscuro being unable to post 100-word arguments without writing 3-pages posts.
Eugenics: you know it's right!
SHMUP sale page.
User avatar
Friendly
Posts: 2313
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 7:09 pm

Re: Nerdcore: Should Deckard be a replicant in Blade Runner?

Post by Friendly »

PC Engine Fan X! wrote: I find it fascinating that the BR film does co-exist within the original Alien flick universe as well. Tyrell Corp. and Weyland Industries (later on known as Weyland-Yutani joint-venture conglomerate) co-existing together in the 21st century.
Sorry, but that's bull. As you certainly know, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep is by PKD, and has zilch to do with Alien. Crossover stuff like Dracula vs. Frankenstein is for the weak of mind.

In a way I am glad that Blade Runner was never tainted by any bullshit sequels. Hamlet doesn't need a sequel, either.
User avatar
Ed Oscuro
Posts: 18654
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 4:13 pm
Location: uoıʇɐɹnƃıɟuoɔ ɯǝʇsʎs

Re: Nerdcore: Should Deckard be a replicant in Blade Runner?

Post by Ed Oscuro »

User avatar
GaijinPunch
Posts: 15846
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 11:22 pm
Location: San Fransicso

Re: Nerdcore: Should Deckard be a replicant in Blade Runner?

Post by GaijinPunch »

Friendly wrote: In a way I am glad that Blade Runner was never tainted by any bullshit sequels. Hamlet doesn't need a sequel, either.
Give it time. If The Thing got a follow up (which apparently the studio loathed before it was even released), you can bet this will at some point.
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
User avatar
greg
Posts: 1854
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:10 am
Location: Gunma-ken, Japan
Contact:

Re: Nerdcore: Should Deckard be a replicant in Blade Runner?

Post by greg »

drauch wrote:Wait, what? Not trying to derail, but since when was it debatable that the aliens in Signs may/may not exist?
I was not talking about doubts after the movie is done. I was talking about while watching the movie, you have these doubts. Are the aliens real? Maybe there's some twist at the end and it turns out that it was just something else instead? Then the part when he traps the alien in his kitchen and you can see part of it from under the door... everyone in the theater jumped. I think I may have caught parts of it a second time, so I cannot remember the movie well. I thought that it was interesting, at least.
Image
Undamned is the leading English-speaking expert on the consolized UD-CPS2 because he's the one who made it.
User avatar
drauch
Posts: 5638
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 6:14 am

Re: Nerdcore: Should Deckard be a replicant in Blade Runner?

Post by drauch »

greg wrote:
drauch wrote:Wait, what? Not trying to derail, but since when was it debatable that the aliens in Signs may/may not exist?
I was not talking about doubts after the movie is done. I was talking about while watching the movie, you have these doubts. Are the aliens real? Maybe there's some twist at the end and it turns out that it was just something else instead? Then the part when he traps the alien in his kitchen and you can see part of it from under the door... everyone in the theater jumped. I think I may have caught parts of it a second time, so I cannot remember the movie well. I thought that it was interesting, at least.
Ahhhhh, okay, gotcha.
BIL wrote: "Small sack, LOTS OF CUM" - Nikola Tesla
User avatar
Damocles
Posts: 2975
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:23 am

Re: Nerdcore: Should Deckard be a replicant in Blade Runner?

Post by Damocles »

The director thinks he's a replicant. The screenwriter thinks he's human, but wanted it to be an ambiguous issue. Decide whatever the hell makes you happy.
PC Engine Fan X!
Posts: 9082
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:32 pm

Re: Nerdcore: Should Deckard be a replicant in Blade Runner?

Post by PC Engine Fan X! »

GaijinPunch wrote:
Friendly wrote: In a way I am glad that Blade Runner was never tainted by any bullshit sequels. Hamlet doesn't need a sequel, either.
Give it time. If The Thing got a follow up (which apparently the studio loathed before it was even released), you can bet this will at some point.
Ridley Scott has expressed interest in doing another BR flick...except that he wants to do it from a fresh start the 2nd time around. Will it be the same ol' BR plot jazzed up with 21st century special EFX, sugar-coated gloss, elaborate set pieces and whatnot or will it be a true sequel?

PC Engine Fan X! ^_~
User avatar
Friendly
Posts: 2313
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 7:09 pm

Re: Nerdcore: Should Deckard be a replicant in Blade Runner?

Post by Friendly »

Have you seen Prometheus? I think Scott has completely lost it and should not make any more movies. There really is no excuse for Prometheus, other than the person in charge suffering from brain damage.
User avatar
greg
Posts: 1854
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:10 am
Location: Gunma-ken, Japan
Contact:

Re: Nerdcore: Should Deckard be a replicant in Blade Runner?

Post by greg »

I heard that the Robin Hood movie before Prometheus was total crap, too. Can you imagine if Blade Runner was remade? Replicants would be running up walls and jumping over buildings. There would definitely be a car chase, especially one in which a Replicant steals a Spinner and there is a freaking Episode 2-style flying car chase. Can anyone else think of other ways they could screw it up?
Image
Undamned is the leading English-speaking expert on the consolized UD-CPS2 because he's the one who made it.
User avatar
Moniker
Posts: 2149
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 3:28 pm

Re: Nerdcore: Should Deckard be a replicant in Blade Runner?

Post by Moniker »

Friendly wrote:Have you seen Prometheus? I think Scott has completely lost it and should not make any more movies. There really is no excuse for Prometheus, other than the person in charge suffering from brain damage.
Oh, Prometheus wasn't all that bad. Sure, it didn't live up to Alien 1&2 standards, but that's a pretty high bar. At least Scott had a bit of reverence for the lore. And Fassbender was freaking awesome.

Again, not saying it was a *good* movie, but i'd say it was worth the price of admission.
The freaks are rising through the floor.
Recommended XBLIG shmups.
Top 20 Doujin Shmups of ALL TIME.
User avatar
Mortificator
Posts: 2854
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:13 am
Location: A star occupied by the Bydo Empire

Re: Nerdcore: Should Deckard be a replicant in Blade Runner?

Post by Mortificator »

Prometheus also didn't live up to the Alien 3 standard, and I'm not even sure it lived up to the Alien Resurrection standard.
RegalSin wrote:You can't even drive across the country Naked anymore
User avatar
Sly Cherry Chunks
Posts: 1975
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Colin's Bargain Basement. Everything must go.

Re: Nerdcore: Should Deckard be a replicant in Blade Runner?

Post by Sly Cherry Chunks »

Alien>Aliens>Alien3>Prometheus>AVP>Alien Resurrection>AVPR
The biggest unanswered question is where is the money? [1CCS]
User avatar
Friendly
Posts: 2313
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 7:09 pm

Re: Nerdcore: Should Deckard be a replicant in Blade Runner?

Post by Friendly »

I rate the Alien movies in the following order:

1. Alien
User avatar
Ed Oscuro
Posts: 18654
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 4:13 pm
Location: uoıʇɐɹnƃıɟuoɔ ɯǝʇsʎs

Re: Nerdcore: Should Deckard be a replicant in Blade Runner?

Post by Ed Oscuro »

1 Alien
2 Aliens
3 William Gibson's Alien 3 script (maybe this one slots in above Aliens, even; would love to have a few...dozen millions to get it made with that late '80s, early '90s feeling; too bad the actors have moved on and are a bit old for the part)
User avatar
PROMETHEUS
Posts: 2453
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:00 am
Location: France

Re: Nerdcore: Should Deckard be a replicant in Blade Runner?

Post by PROMETHEUS »

Friendly wrote:I rate the Alien movies in the following order:

1. Alien
+1 ^^
Scores, replays, videos || I have written a guide about getting good at shmups. Check it out !
Follow me on Twitch
Post Reply