Movies you've just watched

A place where you can chat about anything that isn't to do with games!
User avatar
GaijinPunch
Posts: 15871
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 11:22 pm
Location: San Fransicso

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by GaijinPunch »

njiska wrote: I'm trying your decide if you're just being random, or genuinely trying to provide commentary on my hatred of the 4th film in two series.
I'm just being a jack ass, as per usual. I only saw Rambo 1-2, and am not familiar w/ your thoughts on any of them, although I'm sure they're justified, based on your other movie-related posts. I just saw a layup for a few laughs (and looks like I got 'em). ;)
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
User avatar
njiska
Posts: 2412
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:36 am
Location: Waterloo, On, Canada

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by njiska »

GaijinPunch wrote:
njiska wrote: I'm trying your decide if you're just being random, or genuinely trying to provide commentary on my hatred of the 4th film in two series.
I'm just being a jack ass, as per usual. I only saw Rambo 1-2, and am not familiar w/ your thoughts on any of them, although I'm sure they're justified, based on your other movie-related posts. I just saw a layup for a few laughs (and looks like I got 'em). ;)
Well that you did sir. Very apt :)

And Cmoon is right, that post demands a like button.
Look at our friendly members:
MX7 wrote:I'm not a fan of a racist, gun nut brony puking his odious and uninformed arguments over every thread that comes up.
Drum wrote:He's also a pederast. Presumably.
User avatar
drauch
Posts: 5638
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 6:14 am

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by drauch »

Streets of Fire and Escape from New York today. Maybe some Death Ship if the evening continues

Didn't like Rambo 4??? But babies die!
BIL wrote: "Small sack, LOTS OF CUM" - Nikola Tesla
User avatar
Ed Oscuro
Posts: 18654
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 4:13 pm
Location: uoıʇɐɹnƃıɟuoɔ ɯǝʇsʎs

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Ed Oscuro »

Hell yeah, Streets of Fire anything like that cheesier Kurt Russell film with the same basic premise? I've read about this one before, never seen it.
User avatar
xbl0x180
Posts: 2117
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 5:28 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by xbl0x180 »

You cannot go wrong with a Walter Hill comic book-styled movie. At the time, I also thought the Pop music warn't too bad 8)
User avatar
drauch
Posts: 5638
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 6:14 am

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by drauch »

Yeah, Walter Hill used to be so awesome. Finished off my evening with Lock Up. Stallone rules.
BIL wrote: "Small sack, LOTS OF CUM" - Nikola Tesla
User avatar
Ed Oscuro
Posts: 18654
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 4:13 pm
Location: uoıʇɐɹnƃıɟuoɔ ɯǝʇsʎs

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Ed Oscuro »

Speaking of Lock Up, Stallone and Schwarzenegger are filming a prison escape flick. Man, I need to finish up Cobra sometime.
Good shit coming to Expendables 3! Also, Nicolas Cage has signed (?!) and actors with names like Eastwood, Ford, and Snipes are in talks. Wow!
User avatar
Aguraki
Posts: 528
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:52 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Aguraki »

just watched conan the barbarian (the new one).
what an abomination.
I can´t even!
User avatar
drauch
Posts: 5638
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 6:14 am

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by drauch »

Ed Oscuro wrote:Speaking of Lock Up, Stallone and Schwarzenegger are filming a prison escape flick. Man, I need to finish up Cobra sometime.
Good shit coming to Expendables 3! Also, Nicolas Cage has signed (?!) and actors with names like Eastwood, Ford, and Snipes are in talks. Wow!
Helllllllllllllllllllllllll yeah. Life is getting awesome.
BIL wrote: "Small sack, LOTS OF CUM" - Nikola Tesla
User avatar
Ed Oscuro
Posts: 18654
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 4:13 pm
Location: uoıʇɐɹnƃıɟuoɔ ɯǝʇsʎs

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Ed Oscuro »

Through its original trilogy, the Blade movies got shorter and their credits got longer. Here, I can quantify this:

Blade (IMDB rating 7)
1:55:13 - 2:00:15 credits begin to end
II (IMDB rating 6.6)
1:49:13 - 1:56:50 credits begin to end
Trinity (IMDB rating 5.8)
1:44:26 credits begin
1:52:33 to 1:52:52 car shot + new line cinema logo

The IMDB ratings actually seem to better track a credits / running time penalty modifier better than they do the films' actual merits. The original deserves somewhat higher than a 7, I'd guess, and I felt that II was the weakest of the bunch by a margin. III was a mess but it still managed to be mostly enjoyable and coherent.

A couple observations:
Blade is a classic in most ways. It has decent pacing through most of its length and the cast seems to fit. There are plenty of cheesy moments but CG doesn't take over most of the film. One thing that did stick out was the driver's license for Blade's mother: The photo was in color, instead of the more likely black and white (at least in the early 1970s, at least some US passports used a black and white photo still). A quick look on Google does find a plausible-looking 1977 color photo for Alfred Hitchcock (!) though. Actually, you can probably second-guess whether a driver's license would have been common for a young black woman at all in Florida at that time, or traditional blue shoulder insignia for ambulance drivers (not EMTs). A good portion of the basic plotline seems to have been recycled for the otherwise quite original and entertaining Sony Pictures flick Underworld from 2003, whose sequels hold a different trajectory for quality. I didn't feel depressed while watching Blade's sequels, but nevertheless I did realize soon after that it is all downhill from here. Still, if you enjoy the basic premise of Wesley Snipes sometimes kicking ass, there's nothing too much to regret in pressing on to the sequels.

Blade II loses Blade's distinctive .45 Mac-11 pistol and begins a tradition of fucking around with Kristofferson's Whistler character. After an intro that looked pretty promising for continuing the atmosphere of the first film (watch the Moscow scene and then the Serbia intro scene of this film), it quickly started to feel like an episode of a television series, particularly in its heavy use of body horror props. The autopsy scene, for example, looked straight out of one of those crime lab TV series, except with more Ecto Cooler green. I think I lost it totally with the "Blood Pack" crew, a bunch of ciphers in make-up (although I almost wanted to like Ron Perlman's Reinhardt character, even he managed to feel strongly like a nobody. The "Priest" character I recognized but couldn't place; turned out he played Vincent Van Gogh on an episode of Dr. Who, one of the couple shows I've seen out of all of the modern series. Donnie Yen painted up like some kind of egyptian / whore and randomly kicking at enemies was about the low point of the movie for me; these guys had no purpose other than to taunt Blade and get chewed into kibbles (or turned) later. Snipes' CG stunt double seems to get an obnoxious amount of screen time in this one, another low point. Like the Blood Pack, the "bad guys" are distinctive in their own ways (particularly the Big Bad) but not enough to care. There is also a pretty half-assed attempt to make us care about the revenge story that, like most everything and everyone in the rest of the movie, doesn't stick. They even manage to fuck with the partnership idea here, so count out another obnoxious character from the get-go!

Blade: Trinity (with the Theatrical ending - I haven't seen the others) leaves you with absolutely no clue about what constitutes a trinity or why it matters (up until perhaps the very end of the film, where you might guess at a possible trinity, but won't care). It comes back from the brink of television movie-dom but introduces plenty of new annoying quirks of its own, and fails to ditch the obnoxious distracting CG abuse from Blade II (nothing quite as spectacularly ridiculous as an elbow drop off the top of a huge column, but there are some sequences near the end that are very close to matching it). Instead of a rag-tag band of wannabe Blade hunting vampires, we get a rag-tag band of wannabe vampire killers, and (with only one real exception) they see even less success than the Blood Pack from Blade II. I don't even want to say anything because of how ridiculous the stereotypes are and I don't want to feel contaminated. The two important characters of this bunch (aside from Zoey, or "Zoe," in the credits, I guess) are Ryan Reynolds and Jessica Biel. Biel's character shows up early on, wastes four vampires with a convincing enough bag lady routine, and then we don't see anything more of her for probably half an hour. Reynolds and the other take longer to show up. Reynolds seemingly spends most of his time yelling about sugar and sugary cereals, or yelling about dick (he and one vampire lady in particular have a hell of a history, apparently; I agreed with her completely when she asked for a consensus that nobody in the room use the word again). He does have what is probably the greatest scene from the film, though, when he fights three dogs. Well, "fighting" isn't the right word here. Not exactly the biggest tough guy of the bunch, so he veers between mostly useless comedy relief and thinking about being an action hero.

Biel's character, Abigail of [blank], was also quite infuriating to watch at times. What should have been somewhat enjoyable split-screen montages of ass-kicking were marred not only by substandard-seeming fight choreography but also by the gimmick of her loading up her iTunes beforehand, so I was more or less in shock through the beginning of the intro scenes. Ryan Reynolds making a comment about "what the kids listen to these days" doesn't help. Actually, I guess that means they used this dumb, stupid gimmick three times. Ouch. Kristofferson's Whistler would have put this nicely: The vampires already can see in the dark and I can't, and now I'm supposed to willingly give up my other reliable sense too?

The FBI also shows up early on and gets nothing done other than fail to assert jurisdiction, and then is seen again for virtually the whole movie. I was expecting they'd at least make some kind of Die Hard-like use of the two Agents; they get spared, but the movie does not. Bullet-point rundowns and advertising copy of the film typically mentions something to the effect that Blade is now on the wrong side of the law. Super edgy: Does that mean all the federal firearms violations from the other films were freebies? This was actually on my mind while watching the first films, but I didn't expect it to be approached so crudely - it's not Batman so I suppose not having to face the implications of vigilantism dead-on was weakening the scripter's resolve here. The original Blade sets up a sort of plausible relationship between Blade and the police (namely, Blade stays away and only dumb human servants of vampires are stupid enough to use the badge to fuck with him), so you'd think that it had to be broken for a good reason. No such luck here.

When your film is nearly two hours long, how long can you leave plot threads dangling without payoff, before the audience forgets or fails to care? I didn't have any clue what the FBI were doing at the end until later, and their sudden appearance seemed anything but likely. I also didn't give a damn by that point.

After Underworld from 2003 borrowed the idea of ultraviolet weapons (the UV work lamp from the original, and UV headlights and "grenades" in part II), Blade III seems to finally catch up by borrowing UV bullets in turn (which ironically play almost no role in the series). Also, Triple H's character seems pretty much identical with all the other shit-eating oversized white blonde heavies in this franchise. Just sayin'. Nice wrestling moves though. Actually, a bit of reading revealed that a third "vampire extinction except for Blade, but wait there's werewolves" ending was rejected...due in part to the similarity with the Underworld series.

Incubus, the William Shatner flick from 1966 shown in a few scenes, has an interesting (or jarring) history all its own, including the murder-suicide of its title role's actor before the film's release, a period as a "lost film" up until 2001, and other effects of a so-called "curse" on members of its cast and production. The production firm was called Daystar, and this film makes a reference to that, calling a MacGuffin weapon for the final battle the "Daystar [blank]." Apparently there was a clip of Blackula playing somewhere, probably in the Dracula themed shop, but I don't recall it. By a strange coincidence, I heard a bit of the film's dialogue recently on the radio in a segment about Esperanto, the language it was filmed in.

Best scenes:
Blade: "Wait! I owe you, man! I got two new hands, Blade, and I don't know which one to use to kill you with!"
Blade II: Any scene with Kris Kristofferson looking smugly at shit-eating vampires
Blade: Trinity: All the pomeranian's scenes, especially his expression at 1:30:50, 1:30:58, and 1:31:06

Probable loose ends:
Blade: Curtis Webb ("Tell me, Karen, do you ever have second thoughts about us?")
Blade II: "You don't think I forgot about you, did you?" No loose ends.
Blade: Trinity: The dogs. Also, the alternate endings leave some other potential loose ends open to interpretation.

Overall series verdict: Missed opportunity. Maybe that can be remedied by a timely post from GaijinPunch! :D
User avatar
Frenetic
Posts: 954
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 5:19 am

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Frenetic »

Just watched Metropolitan by Whit Stillman again. I don't know why but this movie gets me every time. Loved The Last Days of Disco as well. Don't know if this is nostalgia for 80's preppies, wanting more money, or longing for East Coast gentility? Maybe a little of all three? Gives me the nice wintry feeling of books such as Catcher in the Rye, The Magicians by Lev Grossman, and The Secret History by Donna Tartt.


-F
User avatar
drauch
Posts: 5638
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 6:14 am

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by drauch »

Expendables 2. I'm a huge diehard (pun) action fan, and it delivered on every level I wanted. Won't give anything away. So glad to see Norris and Arnold on the screen again. Only minor deterrent is it's a big heavy on the references/in-jokes, but whatever; they are fuckin' old, so they can get away with it.
BIL wrote: "Small sack, LOTS OF CUM" - Nikola Tesla
User avatar
Ed Oscuro
Posts: 18654
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 4:13 pm
Location: uoıʇɐɹnƃıɟuoɔ ɯǝʇsʎs

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Ed Oscuro »

Good to hear that!

I just watched The Green Berets via Millitary Channel's "An Officer and a Movie" series. I guess this flick gets a pass just because of its history and what it meant at the time. We (didn't watch it alone) thought it was a mess almost throughout, though. The beginning sequence was neat, and the early scenes when they're setting up the camp were fine too. But once they tried to choreograph some fighting, it fell apart. Too much cutting back and forth without establishing a scene, extras suddenly appearing (the villagers do this twice in the movie, at least), guys standing around not doing anything at times.

Having read a good portion of the book by Robin Miller, I did recognize the general plot outline of the final mission, and the base defense seems heavily inspired by a battle recounted in the book, as well. Instead of an American setting off booby-trap charges, they use well-known actor George Takei as a sympathetic (but rather fanatical!) South Vietnamese character for balance, which I suppose was polite.

I also accidentally gave a spoiler for the end of a movie - there was a specific scene I'd seen somewhere or other that I thought came early on, and Lou Diamond Philips closed one of the commentary scenes by stating that they were going to the conclusion. Well, a quick check of the on-screen TV listing showed that the movie had another 45 minutes to go; they hadn't even started the final mission when he said that!
User avatar
Mischief Maker
Posts: 4803
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 3:44 am

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Mischief Maker »

Superman 2: The Richard Donner Cut.

For those who aren't aware, Superman 1&2 were written and filmed (mostly) at the same time and intended as a 2-part story ala. Kill Bill. Filming of Superman 2 was put on hold (something like 70% of the film already complete) while Superman 1 was released to theaters. Unfortunately the Salkinds were a little shady as producers go (I highly recommend giving Gangster/Actor Jack O’Halloran's interview on the HTTGM podcast a listen). They "owed" director Richard Lester a movie to settle a dispute and decided to yank Richard Donner from the nearly-complete Superman 2 and put Lester in the chair. Union rules required that someone direct at least 50% of a movie to get director's credit, so several Donner-filmed scenes were cut and refilmed by Lester, and the Salkinds decided that all of Brando's scenes should be cut so they wouldn't have to pay him royalties. This turned out to be even worse than it sounded because Lester was a "comedy" director and his constant silly "comic relief" scenes completely threw the tone off for the film, which screenwriter Mario Puzo (who wrote "The Godfather) envisioned as a greek tragedy.

Then in Superman 3 we saw Lester with complete artistic control and bringing to the world of Superman broad slapstick, Richard Pryor (playing Richard Pryor) as a super-villain, and a variety of Kryptonite that turns Superman into a douchebag.

Years later, a huge grassroots fan movement resulted in the leftover rough cuts and deleted scenes from Donner's original cut being gathered and spliced together with edited-down bits of Lester footage as connective tissue. The end result feels like a fan edit. Some of the scenes start and end very abruptly, some of the scenes are rough cut screen tests that just scream "sound stage" and aside from one quick CGI cut, there aren't any additional special effects you haven't already seen in Lester's version. All that said, despite those flaws this is the superior version of Superman 2, less a turn-your-brain-off special effects popcorn movie, but a character driven tragedy that happens to feature summer blockbuster-quality special effects.

I'm not a comic book nerd, but as a video game nerd I get enough exposure to know about the whole "Superman is Boring, Batman is the cool superhero" thing where everybody wonders aloud why Superman is such an enduring cultural icon. I'd say to that that while Batman is the more fascinating character, Superman is more relatable. What's the most enduring image of Superman? Is it him flying through the air? Is it him punching something from space? No. It's Superman wearing the Clark Kent glasses and his work clothes in the process of pulling his dress shirt open and revealing the "S" underneath. A lot of people, nerds especially, feel we need to dial ourselves down or otherwise put on a mask to make the other people in our lives comfortable, but secretly wish for a situation to come up where we are "forced" to shed our mask and let the weird things we're truly passionate about shine through. Oh how the nerd who takes kendo classes on the weekend longs for a sudden ninja attack at the office.

Mario Puzo clearly understood this dynamic, and its this understanding that makes the Richard Donner cut so much better...

*SPOILERZ FOLLOW*

The biggest head-scratcher for me in the original was why Superman was willing to give up his powers for Lois Lane. Clearly he thought she was hot, but in Lester's cut that's pretty much it. In Superman 2, however, it's blatantly clear why he's head over heels in love with her. She sees through the glasses! Right at the start, she begins confronting him over the fact that a pair of glasses and a dorky haircut can't hide the fact that he's Superman underneath. THAT'S what makes her his dream girl! For most of the first 3rd of the film the two play a cat-and-mouse game where Lois tries to trap Clark into admitting his Superness and when she finally does outsmart him, he acts all indignant for a minute, but finally relaxes and smiles. Paired with the first film, you see how all his life he's been pressured by both of his fathers to keep his specialness a secret, but now not only has he told Lois the truth, he showed her the whole damn Fortress of Solitude she didn't go "Aack! I can't handle this shit! You're too weird!" Of course he'd be willing to give up his powers for that.

If anything, I'd say the biggest betrayal of Lester's Superman 2 is that at the end Lois Lane does exactly that, saying "Aack! I can't handle this shit! You're too weird" and prompting Superman to give her the amnesia kiss.

The scenes with General Zod and company tearing their way across the country and through the military feel the most abrupt because they cut out Lester's comic relief from them, but it makes the scenes better IMO. Jack O’Halloran's mute Nod never gives a single puppy-whine, he's just a destructive force of nature the whole way through. I forget, but did the Lester cut of Superman 2 have a scene where Zod picks up an assault rifle and starts blowing people away and laughing? The world freaking NEEDS Superman against these 3, and Superman has no choice but to let Lois go.

The other big help of this cut were the restored Brando scenes, in particular the one where Superman gets his powers back. You saw the green crystal glowing in the Lester cut, but what actually happens in the Brando cut is that Superman gets his powers back by draining all the power out of the green crystal that itself powers Holo-Brando. Just like in the first film Pa Kent tells Superman to keep his powers secret from the world, then punctuates that by dying of a heart attack, here Jor-El tells him the same thing, then dies again.

Now I've heard people complain about this movie re-using the "reverse the Earth's rotation to turn back time" trick of the first one again, and I agree somewhat, but disagree more. In the first movie, turning back time to save Lois Lane's life was Superman acting in defiance of both his fathers, "You were sent here for a reason," and "It is forbidden to interfere," echoing in his ears the whole time. In this movie, after defeating Zod and demolishing the fortress of solitude (itself making more sense in this cut, since Jor-El is no longer there), Superman flies Lois back to her apartment and she promises him that his secret is safe with her, only to make a beeline for her typewriter once he's out of sight. This is what Superman would have wanted all along, but after defeating Zod and losing Jor-El he's resigned to his fate and this time uses the turn-back-time move in deference to the duty placed on him by his fathers. On one hand the destruction wrought by Zod on the world is erased, but the damage done to the character of Superman is lasting. In the final scene, he's back at the Daily Planet, back in Clark Kent mode, and back to being treated like a yutz by Lois, resigned to wearing the mask.

I'd bet money "The Last Temptation of Christ" was Puzo's primary inspiration behind these screenplays.

*END SPOILERZ*

Anyone here who is a comic book NEEEERD, a question. We all saw in The Dark Knight the whole dynamic where the Joker "needs" Batman, do the Superman comics ever go into a dynamic between Superman and Lex Luthor? Where Superman subconsciously "needs" Luthor to provide the excuses to come out of his shell? Like a scene where he's at the Daily Planet getting chewed out by Perry White and secretly thinking to himself, "Please, Luthor, I need a giant robot on the rampage right now."
Two working class dudes, one black one white, just baked a tray of ten cookies together.

An oligarch walks in and grabs nine cookies for himself.

Then he says to the white dude "Watch out for that black dude, he wants a piece of your cookie!"
User avatar
CMoon
Posts: 6207
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:28 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by CMoon »

How do you see this cut of the film?
Randorama wrote:ban CMoon for being a closet Jerry Falwell cockmonster/Ann Coulter fan, Nijska a bronie (ack! The horror!), and Ed Oscuro being unable to post 100-word arguments without writing 3-pages posts.
Eugenics: you know it's right!
SHMUP sale page.
User avatar
Mischief Maker
Posts: 4803
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 3:44 am

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Mischief Maker »

CMoon wrote:How do you see this cut of the film?
They released it on DVD. Buy it, rent it, or steal it.
Two working class dudes, one black one white, just baked a tray of ten cookies together.

An oligarch walks in and grabs nine cookies for himself.

Then he says to the white dude "Watch out for that black dude, he wants a piece of your cookie!"
User avatar
Skykid
Posts: 17661
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 2:16 pm
Location: Planet Dust Asia

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Skykid »

In memory of Tony Scott, just watched The Hunger.

I barely remembered it since I was a kid (at which point it was too esoteric for me to get into) which was a good thing because it was like watching it for the first time.

Underrated is an overused word that absolutely applies to this movie. Easily the best Tony Scott film, I couldn't help but lament the fact that he felt his calling was in working the Hollywood system, probably because idiots like Roger Ebert panned his exceptional debut. For my money it beats nearly everything Ridley has done.

Not a conventional vampire film by any stretch, its dwelling on mortality and immortality, eternal love and sacrifice is bewitching. The cinematography and lighting is like digesting a banquet, a remarkable window into Scott's artistic talents.

xbl0x180 once asked me if I could recommend any movies that look like new wave European Noir:

Image

I can now:

Image
Always outnumbered, never outgunned - No zuo no die

User avatar
drauch
Posts: 5638
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 6:14 am

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by drauch »

Gah, I've been busy. Something kicked inside of me and I'm back to watching shitloads of movies--and buying them. Last couple of days I've watched:

Cobra (Stallone)
JCVD
The 36th Chamber of Shaolin
Outland
Road House (seen a billion times already but I needed some throat ripping that wasn't Sonny Chiba)
Heroes Shed No Tears (Woo)
Treasure of the Sierra Madre
Lone Wolf and Cub: Baby Cart to Hades
Lone Wolf and Cub: Baby Cart in Peril
Goku Midnight Eye II (50 minute OVA. Probably more appropriate in the anime forum, but whatevs)

Back to it... :lol:
BIL wrote: "Small sack, LOTS OF CUM" - Nikola Tesla
User avatar
xbl0x180
Posts: 2117
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 5:28 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by xbl0x180 »

I am going to buy a copy of The Hunger now 8)
User avatar
EmperorIng
Posts: 5239
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 3:22 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by EmperorIng »

Surf Nazis Must Die.

It is a movie, that you can guess, had loads and loads of potential.

And it totally wiped out delivering on that potential. It was a real bummer because I wanted to like the movie and thought to myself how much better it would be if Quentin Tarantino or some professional modern-schlockmeister would get their hands on it. It was on the cusp of being a great cult hit, with lots of great little satirical scenes, but not enough invested to go the full way. Such is the fate of a Troma film.

The synth-rock soundtrack is really great though. Some great 80s stuff reminiscent to the much-superior grindhouse classic Shogun Assassin. SNMD was never officially released so the only download I was able to find didn't have the tracks by themselves. Which blows.
User avatar
xbl0x180
Posts: 2117
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 5:28 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by xbl0x180 »

Tarantino would need, like, 50 million to direct Surf Nazis Must Die and there wouldn't be too much of an improvement 8)
User avatar
EmperorIng
Posts: 5239
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 3:22 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by EmperorIng »

Yeah, I kind of agree. But I'm not really aware of any other Hollywood or close-enough director that makes campy grindhouse films on a big budget.
User avatar
xbl0x180
Posts: 2117
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 5:28 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by xbl0x180 »

For me, part of being a Grindhouse movie is having a low, shoe-string budget 8)
User avatar
Mischief Maker
Posts: 4803
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 3:44 am

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Mischief Maker »

EmperorIng wrote:Yeah, I kind of agree. But I'm not really aware of any other Hollywood or close-enough director that makes campy grindhouse films on a big budget.
Big budget grindhouse kind of misses the point. The whole thing with grindhouse is that they're compensating for a weak budget with over-the-top WTF moments.

If it's modern grindhouse you want: Crank 2.
Two working class dudes, one black one white, just baked a tray of ten cookies together.

An oligarch walks in and grabs nine cookies for himself.

Then he says to the white dude "Watch out for that black dude, he wants a piece of your cookie!"
User avatar
Raytrace
Posts: 2175
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:42 pm
Location: Éire

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Raytrace »

Mischief Maker wrote:
EmperorIng wrote:Yeah, I kind of agree. But I'm not really aware of any other Hollywood or close-enough director that makes campy grindhouse films on a big budget.
Big budget grindhouse kind of misses the point. The whole thing with grindhouse is that they're compensating for a weak budget with over-the-top WTF moments.

If it's modern grindhouse you want: Crank 2.
amazing, I thought they couldn't 'outdo' Crank but they did. The horse jump/climax scene was one of the most wtf/lulz experiences I have had in recent times...
User avatar
Raytrace
Posts: 2175
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:42 pm
Location: Éire

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Raytrace »

drauch wrote:
Cobra (Stallone)
JCVD
:
I watched Cobra recently too - pure brilliance

JCVD is great too, love how Seagal keeps on gettin parts just before him haha...
User avatar
EmperorIng
Posts: 5239
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 3:22 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by EmperorIng »

I suppose you guys are right about grindhouse movies in general. Ah well.

Also, I've never seen the sequel, but Crank remains the only Jason Statham movie I've ever watched that is any way half-past decent.
User avatar
Skykid
Posts: 17661
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 2:16 pm
Location: Planet Dust Asia

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Skykid »

EmperorIng wrote: Also, I've never seen the sequel, but Crank remains the only Jason Statham movie I've ever watched that is any way half-past decent.
Jason Statham films are shit by default, because he's in them.
Always outnumbered, never outgunned - No zuo no die

User avatar
drauch
Posts: 5638
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 6:14 am

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by drauch »

Raytrace wrote:
drauch wrote:
Cobra (Stallone)
JCVD
:
I watched Cobra recently too - pure brilliance

JCVD is great too, love how Seagal keeps on gettin parts just before him haha...
Ha! Yeah, that part about Seagal cutting off his pony tail was gold. I was talking at work about putting my hair in a pony tail just like Seagal. I should probably do that.
BIL wrote: "Small sack, LOTS OF CUM" - Nikola Tesla
User avatar
Siren2011
Banned User
Posts: 793
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 6:51 pm
Location: The sky on my television set.

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Siren2011 »

What's Up Doc (1972), starring Barbara Streisand and Ryan O'Neal, script by some genius writer who worked for SNL back when it didn't suck diseased cock. Absolutely charming film, and Barbara was smoking hot back then, especially since her character was witty as all hell.

But, yup. This movie is how comedy on film should be. Fully quotable, lovable characters (even the ones you're supposed to hate by law of conventions.), a great soundtrack, and amusing/entertaining progression. None of that Friends With Benefits and Forgetting Sarah Marshal bullshit we're given today. ("Funniest fucking movie I've ever seen." my ass, Ebert.)
"Too kawaii to live, too sugoi to die. Trapped in a moe~ existence"
Post Reply