*looks at PCBs and cabs dotted around the place*RNGmaster wrote:Why are you spending so much money on games that you're bad at?
I see what you did there.

*looks at PCBs and cabs dotted around the place*RNGmaster wrote:Why are you spending so much money on games that you're bad at?
Because I'm awesome.RNGmaster wrote:Why are you spending so much money on games that you're bad at?DrTrouserPlank wrote:I'd love to play something else. I currently have DFK 1.5, Akai Katana, and DOJBLEX sitting here with no machine to play them on.
If Renchi.com would be so kind as to reopen I'd order my machine, but as it is I'm pretty much stuck with futari, ESPgaluda2, and MMP/PS for the time being.
OK, thanks for clearing that up.Drake wrote:I couldn't care less about you spending your money on things you're bad at and whine about. I couldn't care less about you not beating your games and wondering why you can't beat them after blindly charging in for 100 hours.
I find it passes the time quite nicely between rage-quitting a session and starting another a bit later.Drake wrote:But why do you have to come here to bitch about it in ways that make you sound completely incompetent?
For pure survival play, I would say 95% of the time, minimum. Luck is not a factor in this, the game plays out pretty much exactly the same every time and gives you very large margins for error besides. The 5% failures will be due to my own performance being bad and making stupid mistakes rather than any randomness on the part of the game.DrTrouserPlank wrote:Can't even get past stage 3 now![]()
The luck you must need to clear this is ridiculous. I've played it so much that I know the stages back-to-front and can play them in my head but I still can't fluke a clear.#
Seriously, lets put the BS aside now.. does anyone here who's cleared it actually think they weren't the benefactor of an enormous amount of luck when they did? How often can you do it now? 1 in 10 attempts, 1 in 50?
You don't know the stages that well then. I clear stage 3 almost every play through.DrTrouserPlank wrote:Can't even get past stage 3 now![]()
The luck you must need to clear this is ridiculous. I've played it so much that I know the stages back-to-front and can play them in my head but I still can't fluke a clear.#
Seriously, lets put the BS aside now.. does anyone here who's cleared it actually think they weren't the benefactor of an enormous amount of luck when they did? How often can you do it now? 1 in 10 attempts, 1 in 50?
Yes, that's when you need actual skill.DrTrouserPlank wrote:Knowing the stages (or not) doesn't have any baring on whether you squeeze through a gap or dodge into a bullet.
Then don't do errors. In a well designed shmup (like Futari), you will only need luck when you are not good enough to do something.A fraction of a second too much pressure on the pad one way, or not enough in the other is nothing to do with knowing the stages. It's about what the margins for error are and how many times you are asked to run your luck against them.
If it stops being fun then don't do it.DrTrouserPlank wrote:My method of practice is to sit down and grind the f***ing stages over and over until I want to throw up.
Exactly.brentsg wrote:If it stops being fun then don't do it.DrTrouserPlank wrote:My method of practice is to sit down and grind the f***ing stages over and over until I want to throw up.
It's not that they aren't manageable is that you inevitably hit something that you don't mean todunpeal2064 wrote:Eh, seems like you wanna bitch and moan more than you want real advice.
I could let my gfs little brother play this game, and 1/50 times he would clear stage 3. Doesn't mean he has the skill to do so, but a small hitbox makes luck runs like what you are doing possible.
Try to just play stage 3 until you REALLY know it, because you dont. If you did, you would know how to manipulate the patterns to make them managable.
If you do the same thing each run, the enemies will do the same thing as well.
and for the last time, its NOT luck based
I've got Viva-pinata. It's in one of those wall-mounted glass boxes that says "Break in case of emergency".xbl0x180 wrote:Exactly.brentsg wrote:If it stops being fun then don't do it.DrTrouserPlank wrote:My method of practice is to sit down and grind the f***ing stages over and over until I want to throw up.
Once I refer to a fun activity by verbs and adjectives such as "grind" and "work," then it has run its expiration date. He should focus on getting that J360 to play the other games he bought. Otherwise, he could also try Viva Pinata, Rez, and Katamari to chill out for a bit![]()
I certainly had a bit of luck when I first 1CC'd it. But if I were to give it another go now I think I'd need a bit less. This game seems to have a knack for producing unforced errors, more so than others, but it's just a matter of improving your consistency. I do know what you mean, though. If you're at your wits' end you can always play something else and come back to it later. Sometimes tackling a new challenge allows you to approach an old one from a different perspective.DrTrouserPlank wrote:Seriously, lets put the BS aside now.. does anyone here who's cleared it actually think they weren't the benefactor of an enormous amount of luck when they did? How often can you do it now? 1 in 10 attempts, 1 in 50?
Probably 8 times out of 10 I could 1cc 1.5, hell my first attempt at the arcade I reached Larsa, because my counter didn't exceed 22,000 and I bombed against everything that was hard. But why? It's pointless "to 1cc" after doing so the first time.DrTrouserPlank wrote:Seriously, lets put the BS aside now.. does anyone here who's cleared it actually think they weren't the benefactor of an enormous amount of luck when they did? How often can you do it now? 1 in 10 attempts, 1 in 50?
I disagree. For an game like 1.5 Original where the scoring is basically not dying and knowing a few gem milking tricks with the challenge coming from Reco Normal's horrible speed/power yes it is pointless. But for something like God or Maniac where there's actual depth it's completely different. I 1cced God in 2 weeks but my score was utter shit and I felt nothing when I won because I wasn't playing the game the way it was meant to played. It took me 3 months of studying scoring techniques and for a long time I sucked at survivng but when I finally got that 4.4bil 1cc even if I didn't beat my score by a good amount it felt great.Elixir wrote:Probably 8 times out of 10 I could 1cc 1.5, hell my first attempt at the arcade I reached Larsa, because my counter didn't exceed 22,000 and I bombed against everything that was hard. But why? It's pointless "to 1cc" after doing so the first time.DrTrouserPlank wrote:Seriously, lets put the BS aside now.. does anyone here who's cleared it actually think they weren't the benefactor of an enormous amount of luck when they did? How often can you do it now? 1 in 10 attempts, 1 in 50?
I guess I'll clarify.Gus wrote:I disagree. For an game like 1.5 Original where the scoring is basically not dying and knowing a few gem milking tricks with the challenge coming from Reco Normal's horrible speed/power yes it is pointless. But for something like God or Maniac where there's actual depth it's completely different. I 1cced God in 2 weeks but my score was utter shit and I felt nothing when I won because I wasn't playing the game the way it was meant to played. It took me 3 months of studying scoring techniques and for a long time I sucked at survivng but when I finally got that 4.4bil 1cc even if I didn't beat my score by a good amount it felt great.Elixir wrote:Probably 8 times out of 10 I could 1cc 1.5, hell my first attempt at the arcade I reached Larsa, because my counter didn't exceed 22,000 and I bombed against everything that was hard. But why? It's pointless "to 1cc" after doing so the first time.DrTrouserPlank wrote:Seriously, lets put the BS aside now.. does anyone here who's cleared it actually think they weren't the benefactor of an enormous amount of luck when they did? How often can you do it now? 1 in 10 attempts, 1 in 50?
I guess what I'm trying to say is it's far more satisfying to play the game like intended and go for high scores than to try to get hold of every shortcut you can give the devs the finger. While DrTrouserPlank does come across as a whiny and annoying poster I think you guys are adressing it the wrong way. That being telling him that he sucks when it's more that 1.5 Original is a very annoying game that isn't fun to play for score. This is why I recommend just switching to a different mode. Yes, they're harder but they're also a lot less frustrating and much more enjoyable to score. You'll get better at dodging as well.
If his goal is to clear the game then yes, of course he's currently bad at it. The whole point of practicing a game is to get less bad and it won't work if you don't see there's lots of room to improve.Sumez wrote:So the guy can reach Larsa on one credit, but not beat her, and he's BAD at the game?
You guys...
A lot maybe, enough no. There is never enough practice and you will never reach a point where you couldn't still get better. That's the beauty of the genre and I don't understand why someone here wouldn't get it.Sumez wrote:If he's able to even reach Larsa, I'd take he has practiced the game a lot already. Even if it is one of Cave's easier game (on Original and Maniac).
People should be more supportive, instead of going "why even pay for the game".
EDIT: I read your post wrong >_>Erppo wrote: A lot maybe, enough no. There is never enough practice and you will never reach a point where you couldn't still get better. That's the beauty of the genre and I don't understand why someone here wouldn't get it.
That's pretty much exactly what he just said.Sumez wrote:Really? I think the beauty of the genre, especially in games with deep scoring systems like a lot of Cave games, is that you can almost ALWAYS get better, no matter how good you are.Erppo wrote: A lot maybe, enough no. There is never enough practice and you will never reach a point where you couldn't still get better. That's the beauty of the genre and I don't understand why someone here wouldn't get it.