The movie itself was garbage just like you'd expect. Not to mention its premise makes no sense in the first place. The movies only redeeming quality was that it managed to pass the time faster.

BryanM wrote:You're trapped in a haunted house. There's a ghost. It wants to eat your friends and have sex with your cat. When forced to decide between the lives of your friends and the chastity of your kitty, you choose the cat.
It doesn't actually look that good sadly. There's just far too much reliance these days on the CGI slowmo to make the movie "impressive" - so that's really all it is. Just a lot of money and swooping cameras and slowmo CGI to gloss over everything perfunctory.PC Engine Fan X! wrote:Five minute clip from the 2017 live-action version of Ghost in The Shell: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlXuACzsPcw
The practical EFX shown in the live-action version of GiTS were fabricated by none other than Weta Workshop themselves based out of New Zealand, folks.
PC Engine Fan X! ^_~
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
When I saw the preview I felt most of it was a shot for shot remake. Why bother?Skykid wrote:
It doesn't actually look that good sadly.
It's definitely not a shot for shot remake, it lacks that understated class.Stevens wrote:When I saw the preview I felt most of it was a shot for shot remake. Why bother?Skykid wrote:
It doesn't actually look that good sadly.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
I'm not. In fact this whole trailer is a perfect example of the phenomena that when you try to sanitize the salacious to make it PG-13 or god forbid kid-friendly that the sexiness turns into creepiness. Like when they made a Ninja Gaiden game for the DS and to keep things kid friendly the turned their usual voluptuous sex object character that the camera lingers over into a hideously deformed demon.Skykid wrote:I'm a fan of Johannsen's bodysuit though.
Or even the TV show, which is in some ways superior to the film. I've grown to enjoy the latter, although I was not a fan when it first came out. It was a weird one in that the dub was made available quite soon after the Japanese release, and there was no fan sub. That put me off hugely as it was and still is complete and total shit... which sounds like what they're going for with the script of the Hollywood version. Yikes.Skykid wrote: It's a shame they couldn't give it to a real director who understands the beauty of GiTS was the way Oshii focused on the smaller details, using static, thoughtful cinematography and a perfectly poised sense of future-bleakness.
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
Here's the 411 on the live action GiTS thermo-optic bodysuit that was developed by Weta Workshop as well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbCyXVEVpKk A lot of work went into the designing and testing aspects of it on the female form/model.Mischief Maker wrote:I'm not. In fact this whole trailer is a perfect example of the phenomena that when you try to sanitize the salacious to make it PG-13 or god forbid kid-friendly that the sexiness turns into creepiness. Like when they made a Ninja Gaiden game for the DS and to keep things kid friendly the turned their usual voluptuous sex object character that the camera lingers over into a hideously deformed demon.Skykid wrote:I'm a fan of Johannsen's bodysuit though.
This scene is a perfect example of why the argument that raising minimum wage would just lead to waitresses being replaced by robots is bullshit. Would YOU want to pay good money to go to a Hooters staffed by ghoulish corpse-faced robots like that? Think how much cheaper and more effective the scene would have been if they just used hot actresses with mime skills? If you started with an attractive woman then had her start sprouting neck rape tentacles and disjointing her limbs into a scuttling spider it would have been shocking and interesting. But as it is these robots are nightmare fuel in their default state already so the scene lacks punch.
As for the bodysuit... if they're not going to house her brain in a recognizably human robot body, why did they give her boobs? They'd just get in the way. Clearly she can have a realistically human head, complete with hair, and her cyber cloak still functions. Why wouldn't she want a completely human body to go with during her off hours? But I guess that's a criticism of the cyberpunk genre as a whole. Why do so many people agree to surgically installing cyberware that makes you sexually unattractive?
Depends on who you're asking in the future.Mischief Maker wrote:Why do so many people agree to surgically installing cyberware that makes you sexually unattractive?
Xyga wrote:Liar. I've known you only from latexmachomen.com and pantysniffers.org forums.chum wrote:the thing is that we actually go way back and have known each other on multiple websites, first clashing in a Naruto forum.
I think that the anime film barely touches upon it, but the tv show talks about it more, though they're conflicting stories, iirc. The show places her as one of two survivors of a plane accident and a boy tries to fold paper cranes to pray for her to get well, and she winds up in a prosthetic body.GaijinPunch wrote:And someone correct me if I'm wrong... I feel there is more emphasis on her origins in the trailer of the US film than their is in the entire anime products.
BryanM wrote:You're trapped in a haunted house. There's a ghost. It wants to eat your friends and have sex with your cat. When forced to decide between the lives of your friends and the chastity of your kitty, you choose the cat.
Strikers1945guy wrote:"Do we....eat chicken balls?!"
Cool. So the movie gets good sometime around the last scene. Sounds great.xxx1993 wrote:So I saw Power Rangers. It starts off very slow, but when it gets to the climax, that's where the fun really begins.
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
You really don't need to. Just assume that the robot says some more decent one-liners, and the rebels get the job done. Save yourself some time.Xyga wrote:Rogue One
Fell asleep halfway. I'll try another time.
But if you don't finish it you'll miss the best partboagman wrote:You really don't need to. Just assume that the robot says some more decent one-liners, and the rebels get the job done. Save yourself some time.Xyga wrote:Rogue One
Fell asleep halfway. I'll try another time.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
Strikers1945guy wrote:"Do we....eat chicken balls?!"
Decent visuals are sadly brought down by the poverty of execution in all other more important areas. The aforementioned robot's one liners aren't even all that good, either.Xyga wrote:I'll just resume and watch it for the visuals, which I expect to be up to the franchise's budget (first part wasn't bad, though sci-fi films are more and more looking like AAA video games)
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
RBelmont wrote:A little math shows that if you overclock a Pi3 to about 3.4 GHz you'll start to be competitive with PCs from 2002. And you'll also set your house on fire
Actually, I did rather enjoy the "Vader goes ballistic" scene, come to think of it. But it was a long time coming in a movie where there were too few engaging scenes.Skykid wrote:But if you don't finish it you'll miss the best partboagman wrote:You really don't need to. Just assume that the robot says some more decent one-liners, and the rebels get the job done. Save yourself some time.Xyga wrote:Rogue One
Fell asleep halfway. I'll try another time.
Spoiler
where they all die
As in "you can get beaten to death by a 90 pound waif with a stick" not right?WelshMegalodon wrote:You mean like the stormtrooper armor they couldn't get right,
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
Done watching it, okay sure there were tons of those.PC Engine Fan X! wrote:For Xyga,
There are plenty of visual Easter Egg nods/references to other SW films in this stand-alone SW film of Rogue One -- see if you can spot 'em all.
PC Engine Fan X! ^_~
Strikers1945guy wrote:"Do we....eat chicken balls?!"
Only interesting thing. Nothing else qualifies as interesting, probably because there's no worthwhile backstory, build up, character development, intrigue or scripting.Xyga wrote: Still aside from the polished cgi-visuals (completely ott for a side-story, especially the too grandiose space battle) the easter eggs are about the most interesting thing in the entire film.
You forgot her one-note non-expression.and that girl's makeup is irritating af I wanted to wash her face with a wet towel.
Indeed, the OST is crud.PS/ did I mention the music is completely unnoticeable? No? well it is.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
Strikers1945guy wrote:"Do we....eat chicken balls?!"