Castlevania Miscellanies

Anything from run & guns to modern RPGs, what else do you play?
User avatar
Skykid
Posts: 17646
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 2:16 pm
Location: Planet Dust Asia

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by Skykid »

Turrican wrote:I don't have netflix and so I'm not watching this stuff but...

It seems to me that we're witnessing a small miracle. They're handling a license, and they're *not* fucking it beyond repair.
Don't get your hopes up, it's FAR from great.

I'm nearly done with this now and I can honestly say I've figured out a good reason for not showing this to kids: It's so FUCKING BORING.

What's going on these days? Don't scriptwriters have any idea how to have fun? Not least with material that comes from a video game? A guy with a whip destroying the undead and mythological monsters is all you need to get the juices flowing, but somehow they always have to make it as serious as they possibly can. Politics, church and state, Christianity, ancient sects... who gives a shit? I want that stuff to be periphery; window dressing - not taking up giant slabs of what's supposed to be an entertaining story. In the third episode it starts with an action sequence that's ok for the two minutes it lasts, and then it goes back to lengthy, tiring, trite and pointless waffling that brings absolutely nothing to Castlevania lore or the show itself. Nobody fucking cares, stop procrastinating.

The script is woeful, to be fair. It's completely uninspiring, and at no point does it ever actually become 'fun'. What's up with that? Is it so difficult to have a gothic fantasy world that we can have fun with, rather than endless gloom and doomspeak? It doesn't help that Trevor Belmont's voice actor is frankly shit. Totally miscast and terrible at dropping any decent one liner, he's as mopey and boring as everything else. He's weak, doesn't instil any belief in the 'manly' lines he keeps mumbling out, and is frankly kind of embarrassing. Way to go, that's a good way to fuck up your show.

Sorry folks, but I'm not feeling it. I *know* what fun feels like, and I know how entertainment that does it right gets it right, and this ain't making the grade.

At first glance it seems like they've done it some justice. But pay closer attention and it's just feeble. The same old errors they seem to make time and time again in attempting to revisit much loved material and update it somehow.

I wouldn't say it sucks, but come on, open your eyes: it's really not very good.
Always outnumbered, never outgunned - No zuo no die

User avatar
Turrican
Posts: 4690
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 5:28 am
Location: Landorin
Contact:

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by Turrican »

Skykid wrote:
Turrican wrote:I don't have netflix and so I'm not watching this stuff but...

It seems to me that we're witnessing a small miracle. They're handling a license, and they're *not* fucking it beyond repair.
Don't get your hopes up, it's FAR from great.
a good half of Castlevania is far from great: (MSX2, Adventure, DraculaXX, the N64 ones, Legacy). Then (2010) the horror happened and it went from "far from great" to FUBAR status.

Given the premises, it's a victory that this stuff is not FUBAR.
Image
X - P - B
User avatar
Sumez
Posts: 8143
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:11 am
Location: Denmarku
Contact:

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by Sumez »

All the action scenes were terribly boring. I would hate the show if it were just that.
User avatar
Skykid
Posts: 17646
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 2:16 pm
Location: Planet Dust Asia

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by Skykid »

Turrican wrote:
Skykid wrote:
Turrican wrote:I don't have netflix and so I'm not watching this stuff but...

It seems to me that we're witnessing a small miracle. They're handling a license, and they're *not* fucking it beyond repair.
Don't get your hopes up, it's FAR from great.
a good half of Castlevania is far from great: (MSX2, Adventure, DraculaXX, the N64 ones, Legacy). Then (2010) the horror happened and it went from "far from great" to FUBAR status.

Given the premises, it's a victory that this stuff is not FUBAR.

Ha ha, shit is so bad these days I can see why people are so easy to please! Basically your expectations are so far below sea level that you'll take anything you can get.

Sumez wrote:All the action scenes were terribly boring. I would hate the show if it were just that.
Please - I don't believe anyone was genuinely "engrossed" by 20 minutes of badly written, verbose procrastination that was meant to round characters and form 'plot', neither of which are achieved successfully.

Sometimes less is so much more. As soon as these piss poor screenwriters and unimaginative visualists figure that out the better.

You can see what you want to see, and convince yourselves that it's really good if that's what you want.
But the reality is that it's error ridden in execution and dull as dishwater for the most part.

For perspective, I've seen episodes of Duck Tales that absolutely destroy this for mystery, intrigue, adventure, personality, animation quality, and entertainment. Now consider that and think about whether they've done the Castlevania license justice.
Always outnumbered, never outgunned - No zuo no die

User avatar
Super Laydock
Posts: 3094
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:24 pm
Location: Latis / Netherlands

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by Super Laydock »

Skykid wrote: For perspective, I've seen episodes of Duck Tales that absolutely destroy this for
Mystery, intrigue, adventure, personality, animation quality, and entertainment. Now consider that and think about whether they've done the Castlevania license justice.
Some might say the same about the Duck Tales video game, but that doesn't make Castlevania and it's offspring less enjoyable as a games. :wink:

Take it for what it is, just 85 minutes of enjoyable non pretentious tv. :)
Barroom hero!
Bathroom hero!
User avatar
Turrican
Posts: 4690
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 5:28 am
Location: Landorin
Contact:

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by Turrican »

Skykid wrote:Ha ha, shit is so bad these days I can see why people are so easy to please! Basically your expectations are so far below sea level that you'll take anything you can get.
Yeah... I'm that pessimist. Actually, my biggest hope for this netflix series is that it *doesn't* spark an interest in Konami to resurrect the series in videogames. Because I couldn't survive another rape of it.

If the show's good on its terms, all is well. But please no more mediocre videogames from clueless people. Let it rest.
Image
X - P - B
User avatar
Sumez
Posts: 8143
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:11 am
Location: Denmarku
Contact:

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by Sumez »

Super Laydock wrote: Take it for what it is, just 85 minutes of enjoyable non pretentious tv. :)
Exactly.
I'm with Turrican here. It may be setting my expectations lower than they should be, but the mere fact that this series is enjoyable, hell, the mere fact that it's not a disaster, is itself a victory.
User avatar
FinalBaton
Posts: 4468
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:38 pm
Location: Québec City

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by FinalBaton »

I'm personally happy that it's more context-building/story than action. The action ratio is perfectly fine to me.
-FM Synth & Black Metal-
User avatar
Skykid
Posts: 17646
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 2:16 pm
Location: Planet Dust Asia

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by Skykid »

Sumez wrote:
Super Laydock wrote: Take it for what it is, just 85 minutes of enjoyable non pretentious tv. :)
Exactly.
I'm with Turrican here. It may be setting my expectations lower than they should be, but the mere fact that this series is enjoyable, hell, the mere fact that it's not a disaster, is itself a victory.

Dunno what you watched, because it's pretentious as fuck. That's its biggest problem, trying to field ideas above its station.

But I get it: you think it's shit, but because it's not THAT shit it's actually all good.

If you never demand better you'll never get it folks!
Always outnumbered, never outgunned - No zuo no die

User avatar
FinalBaton
Posts: 4468
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:38 pm
Location: Québec City

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by FinalBaton »

Also : how many videogames adaptations have worked out well in the history of forever?
Needless to say, my expectations for this show were very low. But I was pleasantly surprised, it's at worst a very decent series so far(I personally consider it "good") and I'm very happy with how it turned out. I really enjoy watching it.
Last edited by FinalBaton on Thu Jul 13, 2017 1:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-FM Synth & Black Metal-
User avatar
Skykid
Posts: 17646
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 2:16 pm
Location: Planet Dust Asia

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by Skykid »

FinalBaton wrote:Also : how many videogames adaptations have worked out well in the history of forever?
Needless to say, my expectations for this show were very low. But I was pleasantly surprised, it's at worst a very decent series so far(I personally consider it "good") and I'm very happy with how it turned out.
I rest my case.
Always outnumbered, never outgunned - No zuo no die

User avatar
Durandal
Posts: 1530
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:01 pm

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by Durandal »

Skykid wrote:
Turrican wrote:I don't have netflix and so I'm not watching this stuff but...

It seems to me that we're witnessing a small miracle. They're handling a license, and they're *not* fucking it beyond repair.
Don't get your hopes up, it's FAR from great.

I'm nearly done with this now and I can honestly say I've figured out a good reason for not showing this to kids: It's so FUCKING BORING.

What's going on these days? Don't scriptwriters have any idea how to have fun? Not least with material that comes from a video game? A guy with a whip destroying the undead and mythological monsters is all you need to get the juices flowing, but somehow they always have to make it as serious as they possibly can. Politics, church and state, Christianity, ancient sects... who gives a shit? I want that stuff to be periphery; window dressing - not taking up giant slabs of what's supposed to be an entertaining story. In the third episode it starts with an action sequence that's ok for the two minutes it lasts, and then it goes back to lengthy, tiring, trite and pointless waffling that brings absolutely nothing to Castlevania lore or the show itself. Nobody fucking cares, stop procrastinating.

The script is woeful, to be fair. It's completely uninspiring, and at no point does it ever actually become 'fun'. What's up with that? Is it so difficult to have a gothic fantasy world that we can have fun with, rather than endless gloom and doomspeak? It doesn't help that Trevor Belmont's voice actor is frankly shit. Totally miscast and terrible at dropping any decent one liner, he's as mopey and boring as everything else. He's weak, doesn't instil any belief in the 'manly' lines he keeps mumbling out, and is frankly kind of embarrassing. Way to go, that's a good way to fuck up your show.

Sorry folks, but I'm not feeling it. I *know* what fun feels like, and I know how entertainment that does it right gets it right, and this ain't making the grade.

At first glance it seems like they've done it some justice. But pay closer attention and it's just feeble. The same old errors they seem to make time and time again in attempting to revisit much loved material and update it somehow.

I wouldn't say it sucks, but come on, open your eyes: it's really not very good.
it's not fun, it's serious business (for Western cartoons)
Last edited by Durandal on Thu Jul 13, 2017 1:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Xyga wrote:
chum wrote:the thing is that we actually go way back and have known each other on multiple websites, first clashing in a Naruto forum.
Liar. I've known you only from latexmachomen.com and pantysniffers.org forums.
User avatar
FinalBaton
Posts: 4468
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:38 pm
Location: Québec City

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by FinalBaton »

Skykid wrote:
FinalBaton wrote:Also : how many videogames adaptations have worked out well in the history of forever?
Needless to say, my expectations for this show were very low. But I was pleasantly surprised, it's at worst a very decent series so far(I personally consider it "good") and I'm very happy with how it turned out.
I rest my case.
I said that it was good. Your point doesn't apply to my post
-FM Synth & Black Metal-
User avatar
FinalBaton
Posts: 4468
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:38 pm
Location: Québec City

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by FinalBaton »

Skykid wrote:
Turrican wrote:I don't have netflix and so I'm not watching this stuff but...

It seems to me that we're witnessing a small miracle. They're handling a license, and they're *not* fucking it beyond repair.
Don't get your hopes up, it's FAR from great.

I'm nearly done with this now and I can honestly say I've figured out a good reason for not showing this to kids: It's so FUCKING BORING.

What's going on these days? Don't scriptwriters have any idea how to have fun? Not least with material that comes from a video game? A guy with a whip destroying the undead and mythological monsters is all you need to get the juices flowing, but somehow they always have to make it as serious as they possibly can. Politics, church and state, Christianity, ancient sects... who gives a shit? I want that stuff to be periphery; window dressing - not taking up giant slabs of what's supposed to be an entertaining story. In the third episode it starts with an action sequence that's ok for the two minutes it lasts, and then it goes back to lengthy, tiring, trite and pointless waffling that brings absolutely nothing to Castlevania lore or the show itself. Nobody fucking cares, stop procrastinating.

The script is woeful, to be fair. It's completely uninspiring, and at no point does it ever actually become 'fun'. What's up with that? Is it so difficult to have a gothic fantasy world that we can have fun with, rather than endless gloom and doomspeak? It doesn't help that Trevor Belmont's voice actor is frankly shit. Totally miscast and terrible at dropping any decent one liner, he's as mopey and boring as everything else. He's weak, doesn't instil any belief in the 'manly' lines he keeps mumbling out, and is frankly kind of embarrassing. Way to go, that's a good way to fuck up your show.

Sorry folks, but I'm not feeling it. I *know* what fun feels like, and I know how entertainment that does it right gets it right, and this ain't making the grade.

At first glance it seems like they've done it some justice. But pay closer attention and it's just feeble. The same old errors they seem to make time and time again in attempting to revisit much loved material and update it somehow.

I wouldn't say it sucks, but come on, open your eyes: it's really not very good.
jesus christ, calm down

just because you thought it was shit, doesn't mean it is shit.
you're not the be all, end all of movie critics, the only opinion on this show we need to consider.
-FM Synth & Black Metal-
User avatar
Turrican
Posts: 4690
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 5:28 am
Location: Landorin
Contact:

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by Turrican »

Skykid wrote:If you never demand better you'll never get it folks!
If we want good TV we demand it to David Lynch.
If we want good Castlevania, we just look into the past.
If we want revenge for misdeeds, we cross fingers that Konami will go bankrupt someday. :)
Image
X - P - B
User avatar
KAI
Posts: 4650
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 5:24 pm
Location: Joker Star Galaxy, Argentina
Contact:

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by KAI »

FinalBaton wrote:Also : how many videogames adaptations have worked out well in the history of forever?
Darkstalkers' animu is pretty rad.
Image
User avatar
Skykid
Posts: 17646
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 2:16 pm
Location: Planet Dust Asia

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by Skykid »

jesus christ, calm down

just because you thought it was shit, doesn't mean it is shit.
you're not the be all, end all of movie critics, the only opinion on this show we need to consider.
I'm completely calm :|

Just because someone gives a critical appraisal of something doesn't mean they're flummoxed. And just because you think something is good, certainly doesn't mean that it is. I know little to nothing about your taste in things generally to be able to know if you have a credible angle here.

So far I've given detailed reasoning and analysis of the show to back up my opinion of it. You haven't done anything to tell me what is actually good about it? Is it the dialogue? The plot? The voice acting? The character design? The animation? What?

No need to get your balls in a twist because someone shoots down your beloved 'entertainment' in flames; you need to defend it with facts.

As such, I'm all ears.
Always outnumbered, never outgunned - No zuo no die

User avatar
FinalBaton
Posts: 4468
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:38 pm
Location: Québec City

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by FinalBaton »

Skykid wrote: I'm completely calm :|

Just because someone gives a critical appraisal of something doesn't mean they're flummoxed. And just because you think something is good, certainly doesn't mean that it is. I know little to nothing about your taste in things generally to be able to know if you have a credible angle here.

So far I've given detailed reasoning and analysis of the show to back up my opinion of it. You haven't done anything to tell me what is actually good about it? Is it the dialogue? The plot? The voice acting? The character design? The animation? What?

No need to get your balls in a twist because someone shoots down your beloved 'entertainment' in flames; you need to defend it with facts.

As such, I'm all ears.
first of all, I have already stated what I like about the show. In my first post on page 35. Here it is again :
FinalBaton wrote:I LOVED how the characters come together. and their relationship with one another. That was so interesting

I liked the base storyline a ton, with the Christian Church (bishop) being the true culprit for the murder of Drac's wife but of course the Church blames that on a scapegoat: the Speakers. (Trevor outted the Church as fuck in Gista, lol). I think this is a really cool backdrop for the series.

The initial tension between Trevor and Alucard was cool as fuck because Trevor's familly has been hunting vampires for generations, so of course he doesn't trust a vampire even though he's supposed to be his teammate. That fight was well done btw.


Second of all, it's your tone that I don't like. Your "you guys are content with shit" tone.
You can have whatever opinion about the show you like, but keep that tone to yourself :wink:
-FM Synth & Black Metal-
User avatar
opt2not
Posts: 1283
Joined: Fri May 20, 2011 6:31 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by opt2not »

Aaaanyways... to be fair, the Duck Tales analogy is disingenuous because you're comparing two completely different styles of shows, and the fact the DT was written originally for TV the adapted to a game. Castlevania is the other way around. Let's face it, games have crappy stories, and it's difficult to adapt a game to full-fledge series or feature. But I would say this Castlevania adaptation is good given the track record of games-to-film/tv transitions. Is it great? Perfect? No. Maybe not. Is it good for s majority of people, I'd wager yes. And so would the Netflix big-wigs since they did approve a second double length season.
But the perspective here is, it's only 4 episodes so far. It's got lots of room to grow, improve, or completely blunder. But as it is now, it definitely is better than a lot of anime/cartoon series' after 4 episodes.
User avatar
Austin
Posts: 1269
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 6:32 pm
Location: Fairfax, VA
Contact:

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by Austin »

FinalBaton wrote:I LOVED how the characters come together. and their relationship with one another. That was so interesting

I liked the base storyline a ton, with the Christian Church (bishop) being the true culprit for the murder of Drac's wife but of course the Church blames that on a scapegoat: the Speakers. (Trevor outted the Church as fuck in Gista, lol). I think this is a really cool backdrop for the series.

The initial tension between Trevor and Alucard was cool as fuck because Trevor's familly has been hunting vampires for generations, so of course he doesn't trust a vampire even though he's supposed to be his teammate. That fight was well done btw.
I pretty much feel the same way about the show. My brother and I watched it the other night, and as long time fans of the series, we both thoroughly enjoyed it. Yeah, I have some minor gripes and some things I personally would have done differently, but all in all I think it was pretty solid. It'll appeal to casuals and long-time fans. I am OK with this.
User avatar
Skykid
Posts: 17646
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 2:16 pm
Location: Planet Dust Asia

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by Skykid »

Gotcha. That was all in a Spoiler tag on page 35 so I've never seen it before.

But happy to take a look.
FinalBaton wrote:I LOVED how the characters come together. and their relationship with one another. That was so interesting
Interesting like watching paint dry? The relationships are firstly undermined by poor and jarring voice acting of the characters, second by the uninteresting and overextended dialogue. In reality the 'relationships' don't really exist. Trevor meets some people, almost flatly refuses to help, then helps anyway. Trevor meets some people, they try to kill Trevor, he retaliates. Secondary characters are at odds with each other over a very underwhelming and borderline straw-clutching anti Christian theme.

Everyone differs on what they find interesting of course, but what's here is so poorly written and molasses in execution that I can't find it anything except incredibly mundane. Mundane isn't the way I envision a Castlevania animated series to be, yet here it is.
I liked the base storyline a ton, with the Christian Church (bishop) being the true culprit for the murder of Drac's wife but of course the Church blames that on a scapegoat: the Speakers. (Trevor outted the Church as fuck in Gista, lol). I think this is a really cool backdrop for the series.
I think it's super dull and shouldn't have any place in a CV anime except as peripheral sub themes. Being the PRIMARY theme is basically Star Wars Prequel failure, because like politics, it has little entertainment value in a product about slaying undead demons.

That said there are parts of all this that work well, and I don't mind the themes being there. I just don't like their prominence dragging everything to a near halt.
The initial tension between Trevor and Alucard was cool as fuck because Trevor's familly has been hunting vampires for generations, so of course he doesn't trust a vampire even though he's supposed to be his teammate. That fight was well done btw.
Some of the action bits are nice, if a bit Disneyesque, but I can't feel tension because I can't relate to characters with poor voice acting. Trevor is really quite an awful fit, and his writing is almost as bad as the delivery, which is at odds with the personality of the character. That right there is an enormous problem.

Because of this I find it difficult to have any attachment to the character and those he interacts with, because I don't like him.
Second of all, it's your tone that I don't like. Your "you guys are content with shit" tone.
You can have whatever opinion about the show you like, but keep that tone to yourself :wink:
Understood, just bear in mind that's exactly what was said to me by posters here - that they rated the show based on how bad everything is.
Always outnumbered, never outgunned - No zuo no die

User avatar
BareKnuckleRoo
Posts: 6217
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 4:01 am
Location: Southern Ontario

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by BareKnuckleRoo »

When I was a kid and they made that really cheesy Mega Man TV show adaptation, I loved it. Obsessively. Was it shit? Oh yes, it was horrible, campy, predictable shit, and was by no means the pinnacle of good writing. It was shit, but it was enjoyable nevertheless because that style of kids show makes no promises about deep plot writing. It's a terrible, campy show with a shallow plot that exists for enjoyment alone.

The problem here is the gritty, serious tone clashes with the really shallow writing. The writers clearly want the viewers to care about what's happening and take the plot seriously, and it's presented as a serious "for adults" work far above the level of a kid's cartoon, but it's impossible to get invested in the story because the writing's rather awful and the characters are unlikeable.

I actually think the voice acting isn't all that bad, but that the material they have to work with is the real issue.
In reality the 'relationships' don't really exist. Trevor meets some people, almost flatly refuses to help, then helps anyway.
What Trevor boils down to is being a badly written characterization of the reluctant hero/anti-hero trope.
User avatar
soprano1
Posts: 3029
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 4:44 pm
Location: Portugal

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by soprano1 »

BareKnuckleRoo wrote:When I was a kid and they made that really cheesy Mega Man TV show adaptation, I loved it. Obsessively. Was it shit? Oh yes, it was horrible, campy, predictable shit, and was by no means the pinnacle of good writing. It was shit, but it was enjoyable nevertheless because that style of kids show makes no promises about deep plot writing. It's a terrible, campy show with a shallow plot that exists for enjoyment alone.
Good excuse to post this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5TBeX405bc
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote:I'll make sure I'll download it illegally one day...
User avatar
Sumez
Posts: 8143
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:11 am
Location: Denmarku
Contact:

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by Sumez »

Ducktales was pretty well written for what it was. A few of the episodes were kinda ingenious.
User avatar
Skykid
Posts: 17646
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 2:16 pm
Location: Planet Dust Asia

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by Skykid »

Sumez wrote:Ducktales was pretty well written for what it was. A few of the episodes were kinda ingenious.
Brilliantly handled I'd say. And nobody beats a Tokyo Movie Shinsha money shot, not then and certainly not in 2017.
Always outnumbered, never outgunned - No zuo no die

User avatar
BrianC
Posts: 8900
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:33 am
Location: MD

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by BrianC »

Sumez wrote:Ducktales was pretty well written for what it was. A few of the episodes were kinda ingenious.
I agree, though the episodes based off of Carl Barks' stories pale in comparison to the originals.
User avatar
BIL
Posts: 19265
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 12:39 pm
Location: COLONY

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by BIL »

I like the earlier Ducktales episodes, but later ones kinda went off the rails. Had to draw the line after this happened. WTF? :(
Spoiler
Image
User avatar
CIT
Posts: 4643
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 2:39 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by CIT »

I recently revisited Castlevania: Lament of Innocence (PS2), as it occurred to me I had never actually finished it, and I was curious to see if in hindsight it might improve on its reputation as a rather middling affair.
Well, after completing it, I have to say it's reputation is entirely deserved, as good and bad are pretty equally balanced here.

I like the overall presentation here. Environments are quite detailed and give a nice gothic flair, commensurate with what you'd expect from a Castlevania and Michiro Yamane's soundtrack is phenomenal and easily the best aspect of the game. I like the structure with the central castle hub, and connected stages with interrelated secrets, and the nicely staged bosses certainly mark the high points in the game. Unfortunately the combat in the game is very simplistic (even when compared with its contemporaries) and the controls feel really stiff. Since 90% of the game is fighting it does get tiring eventually. The lack of depth is further exacerbated by the fact that new combos are somehow only acquired with time — why not give the player everything from the get-go and let him master the techniques by himself? Add to that the mostly superfluous nature of customizables (orbs, etc) and the difficulty of regaining lost MP which dis-incentivises using your coolest features unless in the heat of boss battles.

Overall, I don't regret playing this and did have fun, but it's nothing special. Going to move on to Curse of Darkness next, but can't say I'm too excited by the prospect...
User avatar
Sumez
Posts: 8143
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:11 am
Location: Denmarku
Contact:

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by Sumez »

I don't mind the combat in Lament of Innocence by itself - its problem is that the game is entirely focused around only that. There's pretty much no stage design in the game at all, mostly just taking you through a series of uninspired arenas, causing the game to be horribly repetitive. I feel like it could easily have been a much, much better game.
User avatar
CIT
Posts: 4643
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 2:39 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Castlevania Miscellanies

Post by CIT »

It's funny, but for me it's the other way around. I thought the stages had decent enough variety, with a good amount of puzzling or figuring out how to outsmart some trap, but the fighting became repetitive not because of the excessive reliance on arenas but because there's just not enough there to keep the fighting interesting.
Post Reply