I can certainly appreciate archaic game design and their shortcomings, and I love to take in the history of video games, observing how they evolved. But with that out of the way, I don't see why you'd ever
expect anyone to put up with that.
If a game is good, it's good. If you have to take all kinds of contemporary issues into consideration to be able to appreciate it, then maybe it just isn't a particularly good game. Or to put it in another way, if a game doesn't "hold up" in 2017, why SHOULD I play it in 2017, when I have a bunch of other alternatives that do - including games that were released in 2017 as well as 1987.
All the best games I can think of from the 8-bit generation are just as immediately fun and playable as they were when they came out, and that's mostly because they are in fact good games
