Krooze L-Roy wrote:From a third party perspective, seems like you guys pretty much just ganged up and badgered him incessantly, then banned him when your nonstop antagonism finally resulted in some aggression on his part.
waaat. The thread reads like "this guy reviewed a game. It's got the typical Outsider lack of understanding, but eh what can you do. Best we could hope for. Better off to chillax and remain icy and calm about it" and Icy was all liek "I agree but also uneducated reviewers are the scum of the earth and you're all assholes for not being more pissed off" and then people were like "yeah, but what can ya do" and then he was all liek "fuck you idiots".
Christ, it's not like we're made of stone. Probably half of this forum would strongly agree you can't accurately review something you're unexperienced with (Pitfall! would be mindblowing to a caveman, but is actually rather lacking in the grand scheme of things for example), and believe the five point system is the maximum amount of points meaningfully worth using in a review. And (god help me) Icycalm was a loud voice for popularizing those concepts around these parts.
To paraphrase a quote, change never comes from the reasonable man. The reasonable man changes himself to suit the world; the unreasonable man changes the world to suit himself. Icy bred a hatred for the Nietzsche-wannabe deep into the psyche of the world, as well as solidified philosophy as a detested past time. What is a science that makes theories with no falsifiable quality to it? It's nothing more than mere assertion. With no way to measure who's less wrong, it's a circle jerk of maybes and let's-waits.
(Maybe I'm just an art game fag and nobody told me?).
you can be my art fag
anytime
PSX Vita: Slightly more popular than Color TV-Game system. Almost as successful as the Wii U.