
So... yeah.
Heh, well played...jp wrote:Man, this news sucks. I wish Microsoft didn't come in and take my Xbox away once I purchased a 360! Those bastards! I can never play the games not listed ever again!
captpain wrote:Basically, the reason people don't like Bakraid is because they are fat and dumb
What of the people just joining the Xbox camp?jp wrote:Man, this news sucks. I wish Microsoft didn't come in and take my Xbox away once I purchased a 360! Those bastards! I can never play the games not listed ever again!
What about people who bought a Dreamcast because they heard it could play all their PSOne games through an emulator?benstylus wrote:What of the people just joining the Xbox camp?
They purchase a 360 and hear it can play Xbox games, so they go out and buy an xbox game.
Umm. sethsez didn't say SEGA made the claim. Bleem came in and advertised that there was be a PSX emulator for it and people jumped all over it.Ganelon wrote:And yet they did officially flaunt (through gamesindustry.biz) the fact that "at launch," it would backwards compatible with "the top Xbox games." Hits such as PGR2 and Morrowind are clearly among the top Xbox games and yet will not be immediately playable or perhaps playable ever. Thus, Microsoft has lied and you're defending this sort of deceptive behavior.
As for DC emulation, I don't recall Sega claiming anything of the sort before the DC's launch, considering it's an illegal and unofficial process. This analogy doesn't make sense.
For the last time, emulation is completely 100% legal.Ganelon wrote:As for DC emulation, I don't recall Sega claiming anything of the sort before the DC's launch, considering it's an illegal and unofficial process. This analogy doesn't make sense.
Well, people actuall bought PS2 as DVD player when it was first launched. Since it cost much less than a DVD player at the time, and it is made by Sony. Plus this DVD player could play games.bloodflowers wrote:I'm a little confused about the debate on Blu-Ray and HD-DVD. I think Sony and MS -really- believe that people actually play DVDs with their games consolesWhen you take that out of the equation (how many here use their PS2 or Xbox vs a real player? I bet a low percentage) then it doesn't matter what drive format they use, in the slightest. It could be on superbespoke octagonal format and it really would matter to a gamer, since all they care about is the data being readable by the machine.
Besides opening an users base for Blue-Ray format, I think Sony is thinking of by using the new disc format, they could stop game pirating for a moment. Since the Pirate have to catch up with the new Blue-Ray techlogy.bloodflowers wrote:Sidenote - is Blu-Ray even standardised yet? Last I checked there was no such thing as a final physical drive example. There's been no real testing of that technology in anger yet, and if earlier rumours are to be believed, the media could be seriously vulnerable to damage.
He's probably talking about the Japanese market (MANY Japanese PS2 sales happened because it made for a good DVD player there compared to the wildly overpriced competition)..Ganelon wrote:Err, the PS2 retailed for $300 in the US while DVD players could be found for $100 at the time. It was good justification for the price though.
Yes, in fact I did. Plus I was for damn sure hoping that cart slot on the Saturn was for Genesis and/or 32X games when it came out. Of course by the time the DC came out I was pretty jaded to the idea of ever seeing another console with backwards compatability after the power base converter for the Genesis. Now the PS2 has made it something to shoot for... and I wish it would have happened earlier. If it was well-executed then I'd have a lot fewer consoles to keep after without having to reduce my game library any, I think.jpolz wrote:Did people pitch a bitch when ... SNES didn't play NES games?
I'm hoping they do. There's a cool trick they showed off at the Gamestop manager's conference: One of the XBox reps walked up to a demo unit with an iPod, selected a song, and it started streaming as the game's background music. Fading in perfectly as the new BGM with the sound effects/game still going without any load time or hiccup or anything.PepsimanVsJoe wrote:(That is if the developers bother to include support for that in their games, Namco/Sega/everyone else I'm looking at you).
Have just never gotten around to buying one because I am too busy buying games for my current systems, imports, stuff like PCBs plus my brother and all my friends have XBoxes which I can borrow any time I want.sethsez wrote:Why do you own those games if you don't own an Xbox? And where do you get the idea that the 360 won't support Splinter Cell, which has been one of the defining series for MS (despite being multi-platform, the Xbox versions were always the best by far)? And your friends' copies of Splinter Cell are still perfectly playable on the system they were designed for. If they sold their Xboxes because they figured all their games would be compatible right off the bat with the 360 despite MS saying that compatibility wouldn't be anywhere near 100% at launch, your friends have nobody to blame but themselves.Dylan1CC wrote:Now I have to buy an XBox 1 just to play my copy of Orta and if I wanna give Splinter Cell or Outrun a spin?
People are aware that this is an initial compatibility list and that titles are going to be added constantly, right? It's just what will be compatible at launch. Updates will be added routinely, and to take a quote from that very site:
We’ll give gamers a choice—you can get the latest software updates from Xbox Live, burn a CD from xbox.com or sign up on Xbox.com for a CD that can be delivered to your home at a nominal shipping and handling fee. Once you get the CD, put it in your Xbox 360 and you’re ready to go.
Yes, full compatibility right out of the gate would have been fantastic, but the hardware for the 360 simply doesn't support easy backward compatibility like the PS2 or GBA did. It has to use emulation.
That's the only time I've ever heard anything less then amazing about the cell processor. And I suppose this person cannot be named due to governmental top secrecy.jp wrote:Specineff wrote:The thing is that MS and Sony each could open the door for their respective formats via a successful launch of their consoles. If people buy a lot of PS3s, then Sony and the blu-ray can start pressing and selling their movies to an installed user base. ("Buy Little Nicky HD Edition in Blu-ray. Plays on your PS3!). And then force people to buy the movies they already own in digital format. Again. And then rake in the profits from the licensing deals. Sony invented the format, therefore they will be entitled to a percentage of pretty much anything it's sold in that flavor. (Correct me if wrong).
Microsoft uses a codec of their invention in HD-DVD. Any disc sold with that means profits for them.
(Yeah, I know a big "duh" is in effect.) They just want to out gun each other in the war to secure their royalties.
Knowing Sony, they'll wing it and release buggy or faulty PS3s and players, then force people to buy a revised slimmer version that doesn't suck that much but overheats.
Its my understanding, from an actual Database administrator for the Department of Defense, that cell processors have a tendency to die.
I'm glad they're pushing HD. Hopefully that'll get the ball rolling and eventually new stuff will be in HD, and old stuff can stay low res. At some point, you're going to have to either let go of your old TV set, buy two different kinds, or just have crappy looking old games. FYI -- they only look shitty on a flat screen. HD CRT Tvs are still old-friendly (no?).At any rate, it just really pisses me off royally that Sony and Microsoft are practically forcing people to go HD. Now we're supposed to have 2 different TV sets, or our old-school games will look like crap, and our next-gen PS3 and XBOX 360 will look no better then their predecessors!
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
No way - Fuck HD. It's a needless immature tech being forced upon consumers by companies desperate to sell us something new. The difference between a standard res RGB TV and a HD set is pretty minimal really - it's nothing to warrant ridiculous $2000 outlays on new TVs.GaijinPunch wrote:I'm glad they're pushing HD. Hopefully that'll get the ball rolling and eventually new stuff will be in HD, and old stuff can stay low res. At some point, you're going to have to either let go of your old TV set, buy two different kinds, or just have crappy looking old games. FYI -- they only look shitty on a flat screen. HD CRT Tvs are still old-friendly (no?).At any rate, it just really pisses me off royally that Sony and Microsoft are practically forcing people to go HD. Now we're supposed to have 2 different TV sets, or our old-school games will look like crap, and our next-gen PS3 and XBOX 360 will look no better then their predecessors!
I have one. Why don't you just buy a cheap lcd set if it bothers you so much?bloodflowers wrote:No way - Fuck HD. It's a needless immature tech being forced upon consumers by companies desperate to sell us something new. The difference between a standard res RGB TV and a HD set is pretty minimal really - it's nothing to warrant ridiculous $2000 outlays on new TVs.GaijinPunch wrote:I'm glad they're pushing HD. Hopefully that'll get the ball rolling and eventually new stuff will be in HD, and old stuff can stay low res. At some point, you're going to have to either let go of your old TV set, buy two different kinds, or just have crappy looking old games. FYI -- they only look shitty on a flat screen. HD CRT Tvs are still old-friendly (no?).At any rate, it just really pisses me off royally that Sony and Microsoft are practically forcing people to go HD. Now we're supposed to have 2 different TV sets, or our old-school games will look like crap, and our next-gen PS3 and XBOX 360 will look no better then their predecessors!
Aaaah but here in the US most people don't have RGB, which in and of itself is a huge step up from our single yellow cable or our RF-converters that mash everything into a gray box.bloodflowers wrote: No way - Fuck HD. It's a needless immature tech being forced upon consumers by companies desperate to sell us something new. The difference between a standard res RGB TV and a HD set is pretty minimal really - it's nothing to warrant ridiculous $2000 outlays on new TVs.
What exactly is RGB anyway? I hear it mentioned all the time on this site, but have no idea what it is. And aren't RGB monitors for sale in this country, anyway?captain ahar wrote:i for one think that someone should go back in time and make sure that rgb finds its way as a display standard in american television/video display equipment...
ok... go...