New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
Yeah, Ed got what I meant. I said feels, not is. I'm fully aware that slot loaders break much easier than top loaders. Slot loaders just feel and look more high-tech.
@trap0xf | daifukkat.su/blog | scores | FIRE LANCER
<S.Yagawa> I like the challenge of "doing the impossible" with older hardware, and pushing it as far as it can go.
<S.Yagawa> I like the challenge of "doing the impossible" with older hardware, and pushing it as far as it can go.
-
evil_ash_xero
- Posts: 6245
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 6:33 am
- Location: Where the fish lives
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
Hmm...the shine's back. I hate that shit.
My Collection: http://www.rfgeneration.com/cgi-bin/col ... Collection
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
I'd like to address this part as well. It's not other people, it was/is one specific individual who also happens to be a bit of a stalker. And it's nasty how that works. Keep repeating something often enough and people start to think there may be some truth to it. This is basically how Goebbels' propaganda worked, as well (sorry, fitting analogy, no Godwyn's law here). One example: From 1927-1932 a German lawyer named Bernard Weiss was vice president of the Berlin police, who frequently clashed with the nazi party and had many of its members arrested. Weiss was Jewish, and to better stress this point, Joseph Goebbels, future nazi minister of propaganda, started to villify him and call him "Isidore" in his speeches and newspaper articles. And it worked quite well, people started to believe his name really was Isidore. Weiss sucessufully sued Goebbels for libel over 60 times, (Wikipedia incorrectly says 40), and even prevented Goebbels from publically speaking on several occasions, but "Isidore" stuck nonetheless.Op Intensify wrote:Man, I can almost understand other people's accusations of you being a Sony fanboy.[the slot drive] which makes the system feel like a premium product![]()
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
Ed Oscuro = Goebbels? Sounds about right 

@trap0xf | daifukkat.su/blog | scores | FIRE LANCER
<S.Yagawa> I like the challenge of "doing the impossible" with older hardware, and pushing it as far as it can go.
<S.Yagawa> I like the challenge of "doing the impossible" with older hardware, and pushing it as far as it can go.
-
LEGENOARYNINLIA
- Posts: 567
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 6:26 pm
- Location: Finland
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
I'd get one if the price was right. ...but it isn't.
~The artist formerly known as TheRedKnight~
Fighting game photography: legenoaryninlia.tumblr.com
Fighting game tournament stuff: ninlia.home.blog
Fighting game photography: legenoaryninlia.tumblr.com
Fighting game tournament stuff: ninlia.home.blog
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
What is this, I don't even. I certainly wasn't referring to Ed, and no no one here is Goebbels. I just described a successful mud-slinging strategy.trap15 wrote:Ed Oscuro = Goebbels? Sounds about right
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
He's referring to me.
It's a self-important person that feels they're being 'stalked' lol. I wasn't the only one to notice or comment on friendly's Sony PR activity, just like most will notice the obviousness of his recent comments where he makes a point to keep mentioning "On my Wii", "My 360" to try to avoid being tarred with the brush.
Relax no biggie. As long as you don't keep shoving it down people's throats, who cares.
It's a self-important person that feels they're being 'stalked' lol. I wasn't the only one to notice or comment on friendly's Sony PR activity, just like most will notice the obviousness of his recent comments where he makes a point to keep mentioning "On my Wii", "My 360" to try to avoid being tarred with the brush.
Relax no biggie. As long as you don't keep shoving it down people's throats, who cares.
^ I rest my case on both points.In SDOJ xbox thread friendly wrote:Well, they could release a couple of shmup compilations for PS3
(I know it's not going to happen, but I for one would buy their games a second time, even though I already imported every 360 release).
Always outnumbered, never outgunned - No zuo no die
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
You know, Sony should bundle this with a PS Vita, for instance a 399 USD bundle.
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
They should start putting vitas in cereal boxes as prizes.
IGMO - Poorly emulated, never beaten.
Hi-score thread: http://shmups.system11.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=34327
Hi-score thread: http://shmups.system11.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=34327
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
That's about all they're worth being anyways 

@trap0xf | daifukkat.su/blog | scores | FIRE LANCER
<S.Yagawa> I like the challenge of "doing the impossible" with older hardware, and pushing it as far as it can go.
<S.Yagawa> I like the challenge of "doing the impossible" with older hardware, and pushing it as far as it can go.
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
Heh, I wasn't the only one who had this idea:
http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/20/vita-ps3-crossover/It wouldn't be hard to imagine Sony bundling the Vita and its new PS3 model together for holiday sales, pushing up against this holiday's Wii U launch. Koller says not just yet, though. "As we look at the lineup, there are gonna be some opportunities to do that. Whether we want to bundle the hardware together remains to be seen," he explains. It sounds like we'll be hearing more on that front in the future, as "retails asks for it all the time," Koller says. For now, however, he's happy knowing that the vast majority of Vita owners are already prepared for cross-functionality between the two consoles. "In the meantime, you look at the Vita consumer and a very high percentage -- almost all of them -- own a PS3. So you see that crossover works.
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
A lesson was learned by all!
People have their pet peeves; no big deal. I kind of expect that people will champion cases, it's just a normal and healthy part of public discourse.
Vita as a PS3 controller...ehh...not sure. I don't really know what sort of special advantage (other than just synergy across products, i.e. more work for developers to create Pocketstation versions of games) using the Vita as a controller would confer.

People have their pet peeves; no big deal. I kind of expect that people will champion cases, it's just a normal and healthy part of public discourse.
Vita as a PS3 controller...ehh...not sure. I don't really know what sort of special advantage (other than just synergy across products, i.e. more work for developers to create Pocketstation versions of games) using the Vita as a controller would confer.
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
I didn't mean as controller. That would make no sense.
-
DragonInstall
- Posts: 568
- Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 9:07 pm
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
No point in buying this unless you don't own a ps3 already..... even then new consoles are rolling out soon so why bother. Ps3 exclusive games are nothing to go crazy for anyway.
Espgaluda III needs to happen.
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
Drum wrote:They should start putting vitas in cereal boxes as prizes.
trap15 wrote:That's about all they're worth being anyways
^ You guys are treading on thin ice, do you know whose thread this is?DragonInstall wrote:Ps3 exclusive games are nothing to go crazy for anyway.

Personally, when I get round to buying another PS3, it won't be this one. I'll go for the PS3 slim, it looks better imo, sturdier, sleeker. I wouldn't mind getting one of those LE ones if I could, the One Piece and Ni no Kuni versions are teh sex.
Always outnumbered, never outgunned - No zuo no die
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
Sony's official statement about no price drop:

The electronics giant says it doesn't plan to make any pricing changes -- even to the now technologically inferior 160 GB model -- since it believes customers are tired of having to choose between differently priced systems.
"There's no price drop formally, but the thing that's been happening in the market over the last year or so is that there's been so many retail price promotions, and so many different gift card offers and all those things, being done by all of us (Microsoft, Nintendo and Sony), that we've heard from our consumer, 'Enough with all these weird price moves. What we really want is content and games and value,'" said John Koller, Sony Computer Entertainment America's VP of marketing, handhelds and home consoles, in an interview with Engadget.
http://games.yahoo.com/blogs/plugged-in ... 52483.htmlSony will offer four different PS3 models to consumers: the old 160 GB version for $250, a Super Slim 250 GB model for $270, and, crazy as it sounds, a 320 GB old model and a new 500 GB Super Slim model priced identically at $300. Because you hate price drops.

Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
Sony so dum 

@trap0xf | daifukkat.su/blog | scores | FIRE LANCER
<S.Yagawa> I like the challenge of "doing the impossible" with older hardware, and pushing it as far as it can go.
<S.Yagawa> I like the challenge of "doing the impossible" with older hardware, and pushing it as far as it can go.
-
DragonInstall
- Posts: 568
- Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 9:07 pm
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
It feels like you would have to be a huge sucker to fall for this.
The Wii U seems like garbage, but if some guy had 300 bucks to spare, wouldn't he buy that instead? Not to mention most people assume(I think so also) that a new xbox system will roll out in 2013 with PS4 right behind it.
I mean PS3 is nothing like its ps2 era, so people shouldn't expect much ps3 support when PS4 gets announced.
The Wii U seems like garbage, but if some guy had 300 bucks to spare, wouldn't he buy that instead? Not to mention most people assume(I think so also) that a new xbox system will roll out in 2013 with PS4 right behind it.
I mean PS3 is nothing like its ps2 era, so people shouldn't expect much ps3 support when PS4 gets announced.
Espgaluda III needs to happen.
-
- Posts: 1090
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:19 am
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
I don't expect a new Xbox until 2014 at the earliest, and Sony has recently reaffirmed that they will be supporting the PS3 through 2015.
Here's betting it launches with PS3 support, only for it to be dropped from a later model again.so people shouldn't expect much ps3 support when PS4 gets announced.
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
Make a cheaper console and ask more money, awesome plan Sony !
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
Well, their plan is indeed quite simple and actually makes sense when you think about it: They want to sell off the remaining Slim V1s first. As soon as the remaining stock is gone, you can be certain there'll be a price drop for Slim V2.
That means, now (and in the coming weeks) is a good time to buy a cheap Slim V1.
That means, now (and in the coming weeks) is a good time to buy a cheap Slim V1.
-
UnscathedFlyingObject
- Posts: 3636
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:59 am
- Location: Uncanny Valley
- Contact:
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
Because obviously $ony was catching up to M$ and that is unacceptable and PRICE INCREASEEEEEEE to hold on tight to that third place.
Fucking AAA, $ony.
Fucking AAA, $ony.
"Sooo, what was it that you consider a 'good salary' for a man to make?"
"They should at least make 100K to have a good life"
...
"They should at least make 100K to have a good life"
...
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
I'm so tired of having to choose things at different price points! Quick, somebody reprice that cereal to match the fly-away cost of an F-16, that way everything can have the same price and I won't need to worry about that anymore. It's all F-16s and an iron-rich diet from here on out!
p.s. Sony is dumb. Microsoft is dumb. Don't know about Nintendo. Android?
p.s. Sony is dumb. Microsoft is dumb. Don't know about Nintendo. Android?

-
- Posts: 1090
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:19 am
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
Virtual BoyDon't know about Nintendo.
No backlight in original GBA
E-Reader
Game Boy Micro
No second analog stick built into 3DS
Nintendo can be pretty dumb.
-
LEGENOARYNINLIA
- Posts: 567
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 6:26 pm
- Location: Finland
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
It's the consumers who are dumb. Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo are just full of shit.
~The artist formerly known as TheRedKnight~
Fighting game photography: legenoaryninlia.tumblr.com
Fighting game tournament stuff: ninlia.home.blog
Fighting game photography: legenoaryninlia.tumblr.com
Fighting game tournament stuff: ninlia.home.blog
-
null1024
- Posts: 3823
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 8:52 pm
- Location: ʍoquıɐɹ ǝɥʇ ɹǝʌo 'ǝɹǝɥʍǝɯos
- Contact:
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
Siiiiiiigh. I was thinking about getting a PS3 one of these days. Guess I'll just get used one, was really hoping these wouldn't be priced so badly.
They haven't screwed up with pricing... except with the retarded initial pricing for the 3DS.Op Intensify wrote:Virtual BoyDon't know about Nintendo.
No backlight in original GBA
E-Reader
Game Boy Micro
No second analog stick built into 3DS
Nintendo can be pretty dumb.
Come check out my website, I guess. Random stuff I've worked on over the last two decades.
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
Well said that man.TheRedKnight wrote:It's the consumers who are dumb. Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo are just full of shit.
Always outnumbered, never outgunned - No zuo no die
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
Nintendo dropped the VB pretty quick (I remember magazine ads for it, heh). GBA backlights aren't any big deal; they just saved money there. However, the persistently shitty screens of their handheld series (up to at least the DS Lite) meant that one of the launch titles, Circle of the Moon, is still best played via a GB Player if you care about the look of some of that game's rather poorly designed high-contrast graphics. Micro was a niche product and it wasn't strongly pushed. Nobody cared about e-Reader; it was just a neat idea that probably made them money. 3DS second analog sticks - I don't know about these things, I just play vidya gamez.Op Intensify wrote:Virtual BoyDon't know about Nintendo.
No backlight in original GBA
E-Reader
Game Boy Micro
No second analog stick built into 3DS
Nintendo can be pretty dumb.
So maybe one entry out of your list makes sense. If I had been putting together that list, I would have included "Nintendo misses the CD-ROM bandwagon (But My Cartridges Feel Fine)" and "Nintendo misses their market with the Wii," not to mention "Why is the Game Boy Pocket such a battery hog?" and "Why was GBA sound hardware so bad?" (Hint: backwards compatibility, dropped soon enough, of course; same story as the SNES CPU pretty much.)
cool $toryUnscathedFlyingObject wrote:Because obviously $ony was catching up to M$ and that is unacceptable and PRICE INCREASEEEEEEE to hold on tight to that third place.
Fucking AAA, $ony.
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
I'm sure their accountant would disagree.Op Intensify wrote:Nintendo can be pretty dumb.
Always outnumbered, never outgunned - No zuo no die
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
-
null1024
- Posts: 3823
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 8:52 pm
- Location: ʍoquıɐɹ ǝɥʇ ɹǝʌo 'ǝɹǝɥʍǝɯos
- Contact:
Re: New Slimmer Top Loading PS3 Annouced - Prices Suck
The GBA's sound hardware was so poor because it was just 2 DACs for left and right, plus the GB sound hardware. Samples sounded like shit because they were mixed entirely in software while there was a game busy running, or they were being run on the GB wave channel [really rare, especially because of how bad that sounds, see LSDJ drums].Ed Oscuro wrote: and "Why was GBA sound hardware so bad?" (Hint: backwards compatibility, dropped soon enough, of course; same story as the SNES CPU pretty much.)
As for the shit screen, some total idiot decided to darken the screen for launch units compared to dev units [which supposedly had a color brightness similar to the GBC], so lots of launch titles were designed for the lighter screen, and even games designed for the darker screen suffered because it was so damn dark colorwise.
Also, Sony's rationale for this ass-retarded price is so poor, it bothers me. Didn't notice it last time I skimmed through this thread.
Come check out my website, I guess. Random stuff I've worked on over the last two decades.