Skykid wrote:
I made an amateur assessment on the last page. I'm not sure why you keep picking at wording and going off of the beaten path. If you want to discuss something, discuss the statement directly and not everything around the statement.
Because I am not sure I understood you correctly, of course. In fact, I understood "misfit" to mean something different than the definition you offer below:
In answer to your question, 'misfit' is not a nice/preferable word, but the only one I could think of that fits easily. A misfit would be someone ill at ease with themselves, who struggles to be comfortable in normal social situations due to self-consciousness and insecurity.
Anyway:
Bronies, if you observe body language in youtube brony meets etc, very much exemplify these traits; which is why I suggested the attraction of MLP, weeabooism, or any other extreme attention seeking fad is that the individual can be comfortably un-comfortable in a group that will not judge them, and benefit from human interaction. The show itself is secondary; the trick of the mind is that it's primary.
I agree with you, but I'd argue that people belonging to these fandom groups share these behavioral patterns as well, not just bronies. So, I fail to see the need to sort out bronies and elect them as public enemy N.1, in the quest for serious adulthood.
And, aside that, I don't think that this forum is the best venue for complaining about fad groups.
How many threads we had, over the last 12 years at least, in which shmups were just a pretense to complain that the "mainstream does not understand us", and the like?
There have been periods of this forum (I'd say 2002-2006) in which the main chat looked like a counselor centre The "I like shmups, but the mainstreamerz don't understand me" was, like, the content of 1/3 of the threads.
Not to mention the stream of users that complain(ed) about shmups being difficult, flamewars about collecting (not playing) rare editions,...,etc, and tons of other threads in which people showed *zero* interest in playing the games, sharing scores, discuss strategies, and generally show
genuine appreciation for the genre.
I'd say that this forum, but more accurately most of its users, look much like a different kind of misfits than the average bronie.
"You don't actually know me" is a fair and correct assertion. You know me through forum posts where I'm not afraid to speak my mind; but you've never sat down with me and talked about non-videogame related subject matter. You don't know whether or not I'm an introvert, or anything of my family, friends, background etc. I'd be surprised if you think you know anyone from forum posts to be honest.
As long as you speak with a honest mind, your posts say a lot about your thought processes, beliefs and other aspects of your personality. That's partial knowledge, as far as I am concerned, but that's still a form of knowledge about an individual. Limited? Yes, but that's the problem with this type of interaction.
Your posts say something about what's inside your head, as long as you are honest. And, you posted too much in non-game threads, to say that we don't know much about you.
Lunatic is probably the right word. What about Chess?
Touché. I meant videogames, as I really have irrational bias against console games. I own
Jet Set Radio, and that's it.
Ironically, I play and played non-eletronic games in aboudant doses. I prefer
Backgammon and
Go, or War Games. I never learnt the ropes of
Chess, for some mysterious reason.
Some people lack imagination.
I agree.
"The only desire the Culture could not satisfy from within itself was one common to both the descendants of its original human stock and the machines [...]: the urge not to feel useless."
I.M. Banks, "Consider Phlebas" (1988: 43).