Movies you've just watched

A place where you can chat about anything that isn't to do with games!
User avatar
BIL
Posts: 20175
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 12:39 pm
Location: COLONY

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by BIL »

Good to see this thread asploding with quality once more. Image Loved the Kagemusha nod, Tuna. At the time I'd seen few Kurosawas and thought "Wow! Nakadai-san, much versatility, like Jeremy Irons doubleplay as P1 PROFESSOR BOOTY and P2 SHY W/ GIRLZ LMAO in DEADRINGERS!" Was amusing coming back to realise the man is indeed an actor, a goddamn transformer, again and again in Kurosawa's pictures and elsewhere.

Image

Will always credit Mischief Maker for recommending The Sword of Doom, Harakiri, and Samurai Rebellion as a zankoku jidaigeki triptych. Nakadai's a swordsman in all three to blisteringly contrasting effect.

Ohoho man that one scene where Ungrateful Prick Son thinks he has KAGEMAN dead to rights asking for his opinion on the day's SAKUSEN in front of the unknowing generals - only for KAGEMAN to summon TAKEDASHINGEN from the next dimension with such thundering authority, even junior shits his fundoshi. Image

"Do not move! A mountain does not move!" Image
Last edited by BIL on Sun Apr 13, 2025 1:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
sumdumgoy
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2025 10:30 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by sumdumgoy »

BIL wrote: Sun Apr 13, 2025 12:56 pm Will always credit Mischief Maker for recommending The Sword of Doom, Harakiri, and Samurai Rebellion as a zankoku jidaigeki triptych. Nakadai's a swordsman in all three to blisteringly contrasting effect.
For those who haven't experienced Harakiri. Both actors used real swords (which is still against industry protocol) to give the impression of weight and realism in this duel. Nakadai was reportedly scared to death during the filming of this scene. As one top comment wrote: "Everything the camera does is basically perfect."

It's not only one of the greatest works of movie art, it's the best Japanese movie without Kurosawa's name.
(Aside from Akira. I'll grant that one exception to the weebs. You got me there, guys!)
User avatar
BIL
Posts: 20175
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 12:39 pm
Location: COLONY

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by BIL »

sumdumgoy wrote: Sun Apr 13, 2025 1:05 pm
BIL wrote: Sun Apr 13, 2025 12:56 pm Will always credit Mischief Maker for recommending The Sword of Doom, Harakiri, and Samurai Rebellion as a zankoku jidaigeki triptych. Nakadai's a swordsman in all three to blisteringly contrasting effect.
For those who haven't experienced Harakiri. Both actors used real swords (which is still against industry protocol) to give the impression of weight and realism in this duel. Nakadai was reportedly scared to death during the filming of this scene. As one top comment wrote: "Everything the camera does is basically perfect."
Stories from those films have such a quintessentially Japanese air of uncomplaining duty and utter batfuck insanity. Everyone knows the Real Archery Simulation from Throne of Blood, ofc:
Spoilers for Macbeth :3
Image
But I was gonna look up a source for the dude who played the messenger Mifune runs through receiving a scar, after Mifune's prop sword busted straight through the board underneath his kimono. I have a certain assumption of the aftermath, but I'd like to see if there's any on-set accounts, haha.

EDIT: oh wow, I did the man wrong, that was recurring Kurosawa support Takeshi Kato. Buddy must've seen some shit in his 87 years. :o
Takeshi Katô, who appeared in mostly miniscule roles in six AK films, is here required to get stabbed by Mifune with a sword and then die. Here's Katô-san, quoted in Galbraith: "It was summertime at the open set, I was hot, the lighting was hot, and bugs were swarming all over me, but I couldn't move until I was killed. I worked for about a week. I kept hoping Mr. Mifune would kill me as soon as possible ... Three cameras shot Mifune coming at me with the sword. I put a piece of wood up my sleeve for safety when he stabbed me. However, he was so quick and powerful that he broke right through the wood and really stabbed me! It was so painful. I was not acting in that scene and I still have a scar under my arm." [p. 234]

Mifune also complained about Kurosawa's abuse of his actors: "Those were real arrows and that's real fear in my eyes. I'm not really acting at all. And until I stopped him, Kurosawa wanted to use a bunch of amateur archers ... just extras ... to shoot the arrows!" [p. 235]
That sounds like a great book!
User avatar
sumdumgoy
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2025 10:30 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by sumdumgoy »

BIL wrote: Sun Apr 13, 2025 1:16 pm Stories from those films have such a quintessentially Japanese air of uncomplaining duty and utter batfuck insanity.
But to what end?
Spoiler
Image
User avatar
BIL
Posts: 20175
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 12:39 pm
Location: COLONY

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by BIL »

Indeed. Meanwhile, for the stuntman who racked his nuts on an authentic Sengoku-era fencepost... ;w;7
Spoilers for King Lear ;3
Image

Image

Image
User avatar
sumdumgoy
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2025 10:30 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by sumdumgoy »

BIL wrote: Sun Apr 13, 2025 1:46 pm Indeed. Meanwhile, for the stuntman who racked his nuts on an authentic Sengoku-era fencepost... ;w;7
Spoilers for King Lear ;3
Image

Image

Image
Stop it! You're spoiling me with screenshots of masterpieces over here. :P
User avatar
Lord British
Posts: 474
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2018 12:22 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Lord British »

sumdumgoy wrote: Sun Apr 13, 2025 1:32 am My problem was knowing a thousand guitarists and singers, but not one bass player, so no rhythm section. I just gave up, lol.

I work DTF (Direct-to-Film) in the printing industry for garments. If I made my own movie shirt for the group, I'd probably don this:
Spoiler
Image
Wow I've never heard of that one. I see it's on Tubi!
User avatar
Lord British
Posts: 474
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2018 12:22 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Lord British »

Harakiri is still my favorite Kobayashi and still the one I'd probably recommend as the first watch. Need to see it in the theater.
User avatar
sumdumgoy
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2025 10:30 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by sumdumgoy »

Lord British wrote: Sun Apr 13, 2025 2:12 pm Harakiri is still my favorite Kobayashi and still the one I'd probably recommend as the first watch. Need to see it in the theater.
Absolutely. He always excelled in the theme of structural corruption. Criterion's got a wealth of his movies on the Channel.
Lord British wrote: Sun Apr 13, 2025 2:08 pm
sumdumgoy wrote: Sun Apr 13, 2025 1:32 am If I made my own movie shirt for the group, I'd probably don this:
Spoiler
Image
Wow I've never heard of that one. I see it's on Tubi!
Dude, I've been going through hundreds of 35mm scans of rare movie trailers, and the trailer for Death Promise is so hype! You don't even need to watch the movie. Check it out:
A PROMISE MADE, A PROMISE KEPT!
User avatar
BIL
Posts: 20175
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 12:39 pm
Location: COLONY

Re: YOUNG AND DEADLY IN THE STYLE OF "DEATH WISH"

Post by BIL »

sumdumgoy wrote: Sun Apr 13, 2025 4:07 pmA PROMISE MADE, A PROMISE KEPT!
Holy fuckin shit. :shock: Timely and timeless. :cool: TAKE THAT, LAND-LORDS Image

I've rarely seen such conviction outside of Wakaliwood. Or me fadder's contreh!
User avatar
sumdumgoy
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2025 10:30 pm

Re: YOUNG AND DEADLY IN THE STYLE OF "DEATH WISH"

Post by sumdumgoy »

BIL wrote: Sun Apr 13, 2025 4:39 pm I've rarely seen such conviction outside of Wakaliwood. Or me fadder's contreh!
Nice, that was a good one. I like that Van Damme AAAAAAAGH with his kick and, of course, since it's 1998, we've gotta have FLOOOOOORRRRRRRRRR on the soundtrack, haha. Classic!
User avatar
sumdumgoy
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2025 10:30 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by sumdumgoy »

The Thing (1982) [35mm Scan]
Spoiler
"Nobody.... nobody trusts anybody now..."

A Nordic helicopter interrupts the solitude of a research base on the Antarctic, where a seemingly crazed man is desperately trying to kill a husky with his rife. After defending themselves, members of the research team investigate the source of the disturbance and, before they realize what's going on, end up finding themselves at the mercy of the Thing. But the question becomes less of what is the Thing... and more of who is the Thing: how can you know who to trust?

John Carpenter's legendary horror movie is one that has grown with substantial standing as the years have gone by, first opening to the jeers of movie critics and indifference of moviegoers on release. (Among the vaunted ivory-tower arbiters of good taste, Gene Siskel was the only one who bucked the standing and defended it.) True, many of us might prefer other works by the same artist, because there's always that one movie that does everything for those select few. But then you've got some works of art where the movie does do nearly everything for everyone. Those are the movies that have the stuff of greatness to it, so that no matter how tastes change and refine, no matter how much new criticism it faces, like all great works of art, it endures, ready for the next generation to be blown away by it. And that fact can't be denied by anyone honest enough to admit it: The Thing is Carpenter's great one.

There's something more going on that has helped The Thing grow to have the reputation it has now: the relevant theme of loneliness in a civilization gone hostile, where no one can be trusted, especially with your own life. How many of us have had friends, family members, or those trusted with authority--officials, politicians, doctors, scientists, pastors--suddenly turn hostile on you when the good times are over and the bad times begin? And then you realize it's just you, and no one else can be replied upon... even we, ourselves, have come up short with others when they truly needed it. Our own failings precede us. And that's the tragedy of the movie that gives it depth beyond the obvious make-up effects of its horror stature--none of us can be trusted--epitomized by MacReady's line in his last recorded diary... a line so tragic and sad, he dares not even preserve it, opting to record over it by saying, "There's nothing else I can do... just wait."

These men are not heroes in the traditional sense, for what they've done in their efforts to stop the Thing from reaching the entire world, may just be fruitless after all; a hopeless sit-off between MacReady and Childs, where all Mac can do is laugh at their predicament and wait to see what happens. But if one of them is the Thing, it will only be frozen again, waiting and hoping for the rescue team's curiosity to get the best of them. The real horror is the kind that never ends, a nightmare we can't wake out of... unless we make the effort to overcome ourselves and learn again how to trust. Even when it means risking our own lives.
ADDENDUM: For my new pal Church, I got the deets on this scan.

First, an interesting thing to note:

With open-matte scans, you get a flash of the splice between scenes on the original camera negative. Because the original negative is a collection of film snippets spliced together to make the whole movie, right? It's not seamless like a duplicate/interpositive print. So, on these scans, you'll catch the tiny splice marks starting on the bottom of the frame, then on the top of the frame one after the other on transitions, like this:
Image
Image

Another example is the edit Kubrick did on The Shining, where he deleted the sequence with Wendy and Mr. Ullman in the hospital. You can clearly see the splice in the transition:
Spoiler
Image
So, regarding this scan, it's another movie that holds up better with a used-up print, as horror shouldn't be pretty. The optical track is solid, with no issues, and we detected only a few splices during the watch. I hate the fact that the colour palette has been changed on 4K restorations in several scenes where the conditions are cold, like they're thinking, "Well, it's cold, so let's make it blue! 'Cause people won't be able to tell it's cold otherwise, right?" Ridiculous.

This is now my preferred way to experience The Thing. An excellent scan!
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Sima Tuna
Posts: 2031
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2021 8:26 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Sima Tuna »

BIL wrote: Sun Apr 13, 2025 12:56 pm
Will always credit Mischief Maker for recommending The Sword of Doom, Harakiri, and Samurai Rebellion as a zankoku jidaigeki triptych. Nakadai's a swordsman in all three to blisteringly contrasting effect.
Great movies. Harakiri in particular is such a devastating takedown of the caste system, matched with some of the best samurai action ever filmed.

I've been watching a little bit of Eisenstein. Let's just say... Not so much subtlety, Alexander Nevsky. :P But I can see why Eisenstein's productions were inspirational the world over to many directors. The quality of the costuming and sets is quite something for the time period. Maybe not exactly the complete sea change that Thief of Baghdad represents... But then, these are more serious stories.

I am always impressed how quickly film matured as a medium. That we could have masterpieces even in the 20s and 30s.
User avatar
sumdumgoy
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2025 10:30 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by sumdumgoy »

Scored a bag of discs from the Kino Lorber sale. Looking forward to revisits and new experiences!
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN... SORCERY!
Spoiler
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Oh, and I don't care if your disc is OOP... if it's a top-shelf release of a favourite, I'm gonna spend $100 on it.

So, I did!
Spoiler
Image
User avatar
Lord British
Posts: 474
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2018 12:22 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Lord British »

sumdumgoy wrote: Sun Apr 13, 2025 11:47 pm Scored a bag of discs from the Kino Lorber sale. Looking forward to revisits and new experiences!
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN... SORCERY!
Spoiler
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Oh, and I don't care if your disc is OOP... if it's a top-shelf release of a favourite, I'm gonna spend $100 on it.

So, I did!
Spoiler
Image

Ooh, Sorcery of Rocktober Blood fame!
User avatar
sumdumgoy
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2025 10:30 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by sumdumgoy »

Maniac Cop (1988)
Spoiler
A waste of a good idea. A police officer wrongly convicted by corrupt officials and nearly murdered in prison (declared legally brain dead), impossibly survives and goes on the attack in New York City... only this time, he's after the innocent, not the guilty. And it's up to three cops to take him down.

Written by Larry Cohen, directed by William Lustig and starring Tom Atkins and Bruce Campbell, all of this is a setup for a cult classic with pedigrees like those. Unfortunately, the whole thing has a cheap feel to it. And not in a budgetary sense--that doesn't matter--but that it comes off careless and indifferent. The killings have no impact to them (from the director of Maniac, no less!), the writing is meh (coming from the writer of The Stuff, It's Alive and some real blaxploitation howlers) and the story just kind of lies there. Not to mention, there's none of that distinct Noo Yawk nerve & energy you expect from there; the movie is uncharacteristically stationary and static for its setting, kind of frozen within itself. (It's bad when even NYC streets are filmed to look like a movie backlot.) Atkins and Campbell are given no good one-liners or something to help liven it up and, as a result, we can tell the actors aren't putting in 100% with this bum dialogue...

...with the exception of one: Robert Z'Dar as the Maniac Cop himself. A giant of a man with real screen presence who looks positively intimidating in uniform (no wonder they did two sequels), his every motion and movement suggesting the ideal cop of the old school who took no sh!t from lawbreakers and stood for justice... except now, it's injustice. His opening credit sequence is the most arresting of the whole movie; we watch in close-up as he carefully dresses for "work," putting on his badge, equipping his belt, loading his gun, etc. You really feel like the movie's gonna be something else with the eerie music and that setup, but it's all downhill from there. His scary presence is absolutely wasted in this limp-dick production.

It's a shame, but hey... that what happens when everyone behaves like they aren't involved and don't give a sh!t: your audience ends up feeling the same way.
User avatar
GaijinPunch
Posts: 15823
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 11:22 pm
Location: San Fransicso

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by GaijinPunch »

sumdumgoy wrote: Sun Apr 13, 2025 1:05 pm It's not only one of the greatest works of movie art, it's the best Japanese movie without Kurosawa's name.
(Aside from Akira. I'll grant that one exception to the weebs. You got me there, guys!)
Which of Kurosawa's do you think is better? I think none, even though I've yet to see them all.
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
User avatar
sumdumgoy
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2025 10:30 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by sumdumgoy »

GaijinPunch wrote: Tue Apr 15, 2025 5:16 am
sumdumgoy wrote: Sun Apr 13, 2025 1:05 pm It's not only one of the greatest works of movie art, it's the best Japanese movie without Kurosawa's name.
(Aside from Akira. I'll grant that one exception to the weebs. You got me there, guys!)
Which of Kurosawa's do you think is better? I think none, even though I've yet to see them all.
Sorry, I don't understand your question... :? could you rephrase that?
User avatar
Lord British
Posts: 474
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2018 12:22 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Lord British »

sumdumgoy wrote: Tue Apr 15, 2025 10:57 am
GaijinPunch wrote: Tue Apr 15, 2025 5:16 am
sumdumgoy wrote: Sun Apr 13, 2025 1:05 pm It's not only one of the greatest works of movie art, it's the best Japanese movie without Kurosawa's name.
(Aside from Akira. I'll grant that one exception to the weebs. You got me there, guys!)
Which of Kurosawa's do you think is better? I think none, even though I've yet to see them all.
Sorry, I don't understand your question... :? could you rephrase that?
Lol, seems clear to me.

I'm with you GP, I guess I like HaraKiri more than any AK film.

But in my Top 30 director list I have Kurosawa at #8 and Kobayashi at #15 mostly because AK has so much quantity of quality, and probably more diversity, though I still have more Kobayashi to watch.
User avatar
sumdumgoy
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2025 10:30 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by sumdumgoy »

Ahh, what's better than Harakiri... okay, I see.

Well, that answer depends on experience. If we're just being subjective--I like vanilla, you like chocolate--then it's entirely down to taste, and the answer doesn't matter. It'll just be stance vs. stance. Whatever. But if we're being honest objectively--craftsmanship, expertise, replay value, etc.--even I'd have to admit when a movie is the better film, even if I don't like it as much.

Most would posit, for example, that Rodriguez's Desperado is a huge improvement over El Mariachi as a remake, and it's the better film in every regard. That's objectively true. But for my taste, I prefer the try-hard, no-budget energy and rhythm of El Mariachi. It's more fun for me. Does that make it objectively better? No. But that doesn't matter in the context. All that matters is the truth.

So, I don't think I need to state the obvious in regards to Kurosawa, 'cause it should be obvious to anyone who's experienced enough movies to know which movie of his is considered the better film against Harakiri. Sure, there's objective things to take into consideration; it could be rightly argued that Harakiri has the better camerawork, and that Kurosawa's epic has a much better musical score. But, as Lord British has rightly pointed out, Kurosawa has more diversity, and nothing's more diverse than his 1954 epic. Not to say that Harakiri doesn't have its own strengths, but it's a straight-up tragedy, not also a comedy or an adventure. So, the appeal on a broader scope is limited. Whereas with Kurosawa's epic, it's so good at being everything and the replay value is so strong that I watched it back-to-back with my daughter 2 times over 2 nights a month ago, and (being completely honest with myself) I wasn't tired of it the second time. At all. That's huge. I don't ever underestimate a movie's immediate replay value; it says a lot about its quality.

Anyways, I'm just glad we're alive in a time where both movies exist, and we can enjoy them both regardless of our takes.
User avatar
BIL
Posts: 20175
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 12:39 pm
Location: COLONY

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by BIL »

sumdumgoy wrote: Tue Apr 15, 2025 4:56 pmBut for my taste, I prefer the try-hard, no-budget energy and rhythm of El Mariachi.
Reminds me of revisiting Desperado a while back. Was surprised to find myself underwhelmed with its action setpieces, yet with a new appreciation for its other qualities. Not sure if that was progress on my part. :lol: I should give Mariachi a go, now I'm in one of my every-few-years movie phases.
User avatar
sumdumgoy
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2025 10:30 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by sumdumgoy »

BIL wrote: Tue Apr 15, 2025 8:00 pm I should give Mariachi a go, now I'm in one of my every-few-years movie phases.
Sweet! Can't wait for you to chime in with some takes. Let's fire up this thread! 8)
User avatar
sumdumgoy
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2025 10:30 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by sumdumgoy »

Hellraiser (1987) [35mm Scan]
Spoiler
"What's your pleasure, Mr. Cotton?"

Hedonist extraordinaire Frank Cotton, having reached the farthest reaches of pleasure & pain, seeks the extreme within the spiritual realm via a strange mystical puzzle box, where he opens the doors to hell and disappears from the earth. Later, when Frank's brother Larry and Larry's wife Julia come to take over the old homestead, Julia is triggered by the memories of her hot affair with Frank (which Larry knows nothing about). And when an accident precipitates Frank's horrifying return from hell, Julia will do anything to have him whole... even murder. But Hell's notorious torture group, the Cenobites, aren't gonna be too pleased with Frank's escape, and it's up to Larry's only daughter, Kirsty, to lead them to him.

One of the most ferociously original horror movies of the '80s, Clive Barker's Hellraiser (based off his radical novel The Hellbound Heart) is positively dripping with the sins of Frank & Julia's evil coupling, repulsing me to the point of practically recoiling into the couch. The contrast between the wholesome love of Larry and his daughter Kirsty, and the appalling, murderous adultery of Frank and Julia, makes for a refreshing take on good vs. evil, and what it means to go too far in seeking pleasure. When Kirsty calls her father daddy, it's endearing; when Frank tells Kirsty, "Come to daddy," it's every bit as deviant and unnatural as it gets.

Julia is a woman of nothing but disdain for others, especially her simping husband. Like Frank, she cares for nothing but the pleasures of the flesh, cementing her bond with him for life. (Their affair started when Frank came down for her wedding.) This bond is the reason why, no matter how horrified she is when seeing Frank in his rotten, resurrected state, she can't run away. She is driven by desire first and foremost, and nothing will get in her way to have him again, making her a stepmother way more evil than Cinderella's.

And Kirsty senses this vibe whenever she's near. She tries her best to be understanding with her dad--she tells him over dinner, "You love her, so there must be something worth loving"--but she can't shake the feeling something's terribly wrong with Julia. And that's because Kirsty herself is such an innocent young woman, she's like a mirror to her stepmother every time she sees her. Then, when she realizes what's really going on and is faced with the resurrected Frank and his mystical box, she collapses after escaping him and finds herself alone with the box, where she unwittingly solves it herself and comes face-to-face with the hellish Cenobites, who aren't too pleased to find Frank has escaped them.

Robert Altman once said in an interview that casting was 90% of the work on his movies, then the rest is observing them with the camera rather than directing. And the casting is on point here. Everyone makes it believable, especially when Andy Robinson does a 180 and becomes Frank, giving us the juicy villainous role we love him for à la Scorpio. Ashley Laurence is a knockout as the fresh-faced Kirsty, whose eyes catch the light in a way that makes men melt. She also makes for an underrated horror movie heroine, quickly adapting to the machinations of the dreaded box and screaming down an angry Frank, "You want it?! F**KING HAVE IT!!" I'd even go as far as saying she gives one of the rare great performances a female lead has given in a horror movie, bolstered by a script that gives her character a balance between the two female stereotypes of the genre: helpless airhead victim and hardened feminist soldier.

Oh, boy, and that sound design. The buzzing of insects, the squeaking of rats, rattling chain links, the screams of pain and ripping flesh... I found myself comfort-rubbing the goosebumps off my arms, my skin reacting like one of my wife's scrunchies. The musical score is incredibly effective, too, a real underrated effort that underlines every scene, most memorably in Frank's return transformation. It's a showcase of special effects that remain remarkably effective to this day. And speaking of visuals, this one's got nightmare fuel in spades: pools of liquified flesh, ants crawling over an exposed brain, maggots and cockroaches, the dingy room upstairs, the Cenobites themselves. This movie just crawls all over you.

I've said before that some horror movies are so bloody effective at what they do, that the mere mention of them gives feeling enough to never have to experience them ever again. I never thought Hellraiser would be a candidate for that list, but bloody hell, does it ever make the case for it! It's made me apprehensive about revisiting its sequel, Hellbound.
The scan is top-notch, of course, for keeping with the original colour grading, dark contrast and a hard-matte frame that expands the composition better than any widescreen version to date. I absolutely hate what they've ruined with the new colour timing on the Blu-ray disc; they've made everything look literal when the logic of the original's blues and reds are supposed to be nightmarish, not sharp and clear! (The original blue light that pierces through the cracks in the walls feels supernatural; making it a clear white light in the regrade ruins the nightmare effect!) Horror movies scream out loud for the grindhouse experience, and this scan gives it to you straight, with no detectable splices and clean optical audio. A definitive experience!
Spoiler
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Lord British
Posts: 474
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2018 12:22 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Lord British »

Just forced myself to watch Interstellar directed by my mortal enemy.

I survived, and enjoyed the space travel to some degree. One of his least worst maybe, but fuck this asshole.
User avatar
sumdumgoy
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2025 10:30 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by sumdumgoy »

Lord British wrote: Wed Apr 16, 2025 3:14 am Just forced myself to watch Interstellar directed by my mortal enemy.

I survived, and enjoyed the space travel to some degree. One of his least worst maybe, but fuck this asshole.
There's something really personal to this story...
...and I don't mean the movie!
User avatar
Lord British
Posts: 474
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2018 12:22 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Lord British »

sumdumgoy wrote: Wed Apr 16, 2025 11:15 am
Lord British wrote: Wed Apr 16, 2025 3:14 am Just forced myself to watch Interstellar directed by my mortal enemy.

I survived, and enjoyed the space travel to some degree. One of his least worst maybe, but fuck this asshole.
There's something really personal to this story...
...and I don't mean the movie!
Nah I just think he's a shitty filmmaker
User avatar
cj iwakura
Posts: 1782
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 2:28 am
Location: Coral Springs, FL

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by cj iwakura »

My favorite OOP thing in my collection(neither of which being not worth much due to all the re-releases) is either Criterion's Robocop or Hard Boiled.
Image
Image
heli wrote:Why is milestone director in prison ?, are his game to difficult ?
User avatar
GaijinPunch
Posts: 15823
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 11:22 pm
Location: San Fransicso

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by GaijinPunch »

sumdumgoy wrote: Tue Apr 15, 2025 4:56 pm So, I don't think I need to state the obvious in regards to Kurosawa, 'cause it should be obvious to anyone who's experienced enough movies to know which movie of his is considered the better film against Harakiri. Sure, there's objective things to take into consideration; it could be rightly argued that Harakiri has the better camerawork, and that Kurosawa's epic has a much better musical score.
I jerk it to film cameras, and my favorite is the Ketsui Suction Cup of film cameras - coveted by those that have it, and decreed as overpriced/overrated by those that don't. It's a panoramic film camera, and it's the fucking bomb. So a lot of Kurosawa's "best" flicks left me pretty irked w/ the 4:3 ratio and not as much focus on cinematography. But I guess that's all personal preference. I was, howeer, far more on the edge of my seat for Harakiri than just about any other Japanese movie.
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
User avatar
sumdumgoy
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2025 10:30 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by sumdumgoy »

GaijinPunch wrote: Thu Apr 17, 2025 3:29 am I jerk it to film cameras, and my favorite is the Ketsui Suction Cup of film cameras - coveted by those that have it, and decreed as overpriced/overrated by those that don't. It's a panoramic film camera, and it's the fucking bomb. So a lot of Kurosawa's "best" flicks left me pretty irked w/ the 4:3 ratio and not as much focus on cinematography. But I guess that's all personal preference. I was, howeer, far more on the edge of my seat for Harakiri than just about any other Japanese movie.
In that case, you must see Yojimbo and High and Low. Those two contain, by far, Kurosawa's very best camerawork and framing, both shot in scope. Kurosawa started as a painter and later used that expertise to make his own storyboards, hence why his scope pictures are so much more visually arresting. (Matter of fact, I once read that Kurosawa was the first Japanese director to shoot a movie in widescreen using Tohoscope... namely, The Hidden Fortress, the one Lucas blatantly ripped off for Star Wars.)

If you love cinematography, you must, must, must see Yojimbo and High and Low. Period!
(Also, my wife insists you see Dreams.)
User avatar
Lord British
Posts: 474
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2018 12:22 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Lord British »

sumdumgoy wrote: Thu Apr 17, 2025 11:16 am If you love cinematography, you must, must, must see Yojimbo and High and Low. Period!
(Also, my wife insists you see Dreams.)
Dreams was my intro to Kurosawa because my high school English teacher showed us the first segment "The Fox in the Rain" in class. I was pretty blown away by it.
Post Reply