Guspaz wrote:TooBeaucoup wrote:Guspaz wrote:He's under NDA, what exactly do you want from him?
Mike Chi drew up a legally binding NDA that Voultar entered into an agreement with? Is there a source for this?
That said, if it were the case, why even show anyone that you have it? Seems pointless.
I'm under a legally binding NDA with Mike and I don't even have any prototypes. So, maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think it's unreasonable to think that Mike had some form of NDA with the prototype, be it a legally binding one or an informal "Don't talk too much about it" one. Doesn't really matter, I think it's silly to attack Voultar for not wanting to share information about somebody else's prototype.
If you don't want to share then why bother posting at all? Of course people are going to ask questions.
Either wait until you CAN answer questions or don't be a jerk when people ask questions or get upset that you basically flash something shiny at them to get their attention, but then say you can't say anything about it.
And behavior like this (Below) doesn't make it any better.
Voultar wrote:ldeveraux wrote:I don't care what anyone's done for the community, this kind of behavior is completely inappropriate. You made a post with dubious comments and didn't expect flack for that? We don't accept that immaturity from Kevtris, we don't accept it from our kids, I won't accept it from a theoretically grown man with a chip on his shoulder and a penchant to defend himself at the slightest negativity. I'm sorry you had to be the one to share this with us because you're doing the opposite of what you intended. You've certainly turned me off of it; others too judging by the comments.
ldeveraux wrote:
I assume he's getting a kickback from it then.
^ That's why I don't take you seriously. You don't know what dubious means, yet you throw the word around without realizing that it's completely dubious to make the implication that I'm receiving a kick-back for something that you know absolutely nothing about. That's incredibly insulting. Speaking of being a "grown man", I realize that you hide behind a screen-name on an internet forum because that's safe space for you, but I don't hide or conceal my identity, and so when someone makes an erroneous claim about me, I have a tendency to take it kind of personally.
I'm happy to share things with 98% of the people. It's just the 2% like you which are kind of trashy that I'm not particularly fond of. It's the 2% that are going to run-off the actual creators and contributors of things, not because of their criticism, but because they act like douchebags.
He never claimed you are receiving kickbacks. One guy said
He's under NDA, what exactly do you want from him?
He responded with
I assume he's getting a kickback from it then.
He simply made a statement based on the response of someone else, he's not going around rumor spreading and "insulting" you.
Yet you continually attack people
simply trying to figure out what the situation actually is. Since you posted about something to tease people to get their attention, but refuse to answer anything about because they are interested in the device.
You talk about being insulted but 99% of your responses to this thread have been nothing but doing the exact opposite to people trying to understand what the situation is. When you wouldn't disclose anything in the first place. You automatically just became defensive by default to everyone. And one of them has even apologized for responding short in turn to you insulting everyone over the statement of one other person. (Not that guy)
Literally one person stated you were attention whoring. Everyone else was just trying to discern what the situation surrounding a cool product you just showed off based on ZERO information. Since you wouldn't answer anything.
People only got short with their replies to you and called you immature, after your only responses were to attack EVERYONE based off ONE person calling you a prick.
Jesus, a bunch of sour-assed forum dwellers throwing shade because I didn't go into deep detail for an unreleased product in a Twitter post. Are you 13 years old?
What the fuck is wrong with you people?
It's just the 2% like you which are kind of trashy that I'm not particularly fond of. It's the 2% that are going to run-off the actual creators and contributors of things, not because of their criticism, but because they act like douchebags.
So take a step back sometime man. People are interested in this device and we all hope you can share some information about it when ready, but don't act like a jerk towards everyone based off something from one person that causes a chain reaction from multiple people.