I was wondering which gallant member of the (((shmupsfarm))) resistance force would finally crack the ice.
ED-057 wrote:that he wanted something less far-fetched than Russiagate to be investigated?
First,
this.
Second, presumably the whole "using taxpayer dollars to pressure a foreign entity to increase one's election odds" part hasn't registered. And won't, because as long as it pisses off the libtards it's fair game, no matter what; I'm looking forward to the inevitable "he didn't say, verbatim, 'I'm using this aid to bribe you into taking action against my political opponent', so you're just
freaking out about nothing again" argument.
Third, the whistleblower here went through official channels all the way up, despite assuredly knowing that Barr et al would do their damndest to stand in the way. But of course
that particular brand of subterfuge, no matter how many times it happens, doesn't fall under the "deep state" umbrella.
Fourth, even when the information
was leaked in "illegal" fashion, the DNC chairperson
still resigned under pressure in its wake; Trump, of course, will face no such pressure whatsoever from the
yeeahhhh fuck yooouuu yeeaaahhh party and its assorted "independent" flunkies.
But whatever - Daddy will flout the oath of office ad nauseam and dare anyone to do anything about it, because that's what his nihilist base wants; whenever anyone so much as criticizes him for it, let alone takes concrete action, that's
proof of the conspiracy.
Checkmate, foiled again, you cheeky little monkeys are just
too darn clever!