Announcement page: http://www.microsofttranslator.com/bv.a ... 2Fugx02_ja
(Original link)
Perorder page: https://www.beep-shop.com/blog/8154/
Example with Fatal Fury Special: https://youtu.be/88jXr_B3zgs



Makes life easier for the designer though - with a vertical PCB you just need a horizontal header of sufficient length which can be pieced together from smaller ones if necessary. An angled 3-row 2.54mm connector is probably much harder to come by.Guspaz wrote:Only slightly less insanely overpriced, and still uses the silly vertical orientation.
Replacing the CD-ROM2 with a SD card is a really great feature, as you no longer need a Duo. A FPC to attach to the HU6260 for internal installation would be great, but it doesn't sound like the Upergrafx creator is interested in making one.Unseen wrote:I'd rather see an internal version that I could fit into my existing PCE Duo =)
If you had bothered to check the Upergrafx main page you would have seen the following:Guspaz wrote:It still costs $411 USD (previous version was $700 IIRC?).
◦型番: UGX-02
◦希望小売価格: 44,980円(税込)
◦発売日: 2017月10月(予定)
◦型番: UGX-01
◦価格: 38,664円(税込)
◦発売日: 2016年8月26日
Best quality is a good reason. While I can get excellent results using the AV-DRIVER + OSSC on 256px games, a full digital pipeline is always advantageous. Just wish he would sort 1080p output. Using the inner 216 lines is ok with people!cr4zymanz0r wrote:I don't care about a console specific video scaler at all, but they should make a much cheaper stand-alone CD-ROM2 SD loader.
René used to have a full-width angled connector on the dbgrafx booster, and even though he eventually switched to dual 3x3 connectors on the ends (because he didn't need any signals in between), there is no reason why he couldn't just put a bunch more to complete the connector (if using 3x3, leave a one-column gap where there are no signals you need since 23 isn't divisible by 3). So René already seems to have sourced for himself everything that would be needed... And even if for some reason they couldn't use the same parts René used/uses, they could have designed a riser PCB into their design, because the cost of a flat flex cable to connect the two PCBs is small in comparison to the overall price of this product.Unseen wrote:Makes life easier for the designer though - with a vertical PCB you just need a horizontal header of sufficient length which can be pieced together from smaller ones if necessary. An angled 3-row 2.54mm connector is probably much harder to come by.Guspaz wrote:Only slightly less insanely overpriced, and still uses the silly vertical orientation.
I agree about the price though and personally I'd rather see an internal version that I could fit into my existing PCE Duo =)
Who cares what the original cost? I misremembered what Jason said in his video, and didn't spot it in the Japanese text when I looked at the page. If anything, that's even worse, that he took an incredibly overpriced product and managed to substantially increase the price even higher! The original pricepoint is still incredibly overpriced considering it can't even do 1080p, although even then it'd still be far too expensive.RGBSource wrote:If you had bothered to check the Upergrafx main page you would have seen the following:Guspaz wrote:It still costs $411 USD (previous version was $700 IIRC?).◦型番: UGX-02
◦希望小売価格: 44,980円(税込)
◦発売日: 2017月10月(予定)
◦型番: UGX-01
◦価格: 38,664円(税込)
◦発売日: 2016年8月26日
I'm not arguing that the all-digital solution isn't technically superior, I'm arguing that the price is far too high to justify any advantages that the superior solution might produce.RGBSource wrote:Best quality is a good reason. While I can get excellent results using the AV-DRIVER + OSSC on 256px games, a full digital pipeline is always advantageous.
What you stated isn't correct, and you're being ornery AF when being called on it. If it's too expensive for your tastes, so be it. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯Guspaz wrote:Who cares what the original cost?Guspaz wrote:Only slightly less insanely overpriced ... It still costs $411 USD (previous version was $700 IIRC?).
The price is a joke. I can't imagine they will sell many of these. The CDROM drive replacement part is awesome, and hopefully gets implemented in another, cheaper product.Guspaz wrote:We're talking about a device that costs three and a half times as much the Hi-Def NES and seven times as much as GCVideo despite both of those products having more sophisticated FPGAs.
There's really no reason to be such a needless ass to people, ya know.RGBSource wrote:What you stated isn't correct, and you're being ornery AF when being called on it. If it's too expensive for your tastes, so be it. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯Guspaz wrote:Who cares what the original cost?Guspaz wrote:Only slightly less insanely overpriced ... It still costs $411 USD (previous version was $700 IIRC?).
Yeah, the price is pretty painful, but it will potentially provide a solution to having an interesting OED + up-scaler!Steamflogger Boss wrote:The price is a joke. I can't imagine they will sell many of these. The CDROM drive replacement part is awesome, and hopefully gets implemented in another, cheaper product.
Are you really trying to make people who actually know how to interpret a datasheet feel less than? I think we can all appreciate a healthy discourse, but nobody wants to be audience to your silly toxic bullshit.RGBSource wrote:As a reminder to local TROLLS, this thread is not an endorsement, but rather a heads up on the new and latest products those who are actually wiling and inclined and to create are doing so. This kind of product flies well and beyond the heads of application sheet warriors can hope to accomplish!Steamflogger Boss wrote:The price is a joke. I can't imagine they will sell many of these. The CDROM drive replacement part is awesome, and hopefully gets implemented in another, cheaper product.
For the record I have no issue buying quality hardware. The scaler aspect of this doesn't interest me at all, as I have a PVM as well as multiple high quality upscalers. So, I'm only interested for the drive replacement. Given that I still have a stack of well made 650MB cdrs, $400 is a fair bit to spend for that. Certainly the scaling aspect adds something to the cost here, so I'll wait it out for a standalone drive replacement product, which is definitely something I want.RGBSource wrote:Yeah, the price is pretty painful, but it will potentially provide a solution to having an interesting OED + up-scaler!Steamflogger Boss wrote:The price is a joke. I can't imagine they will sell many of these. The CDROM drive replacement part is awesome, and hopefully gets implemented in another, cheaper product.
Now this excites me.juji82 wrote:The guy that made other ODEs is almost done with his pce cd rom ode.
Is it actually a full digital pipeline? I wasn't even aware you could get the digital video signals from the PCE expansion port. I just assumed this was taking the analog RGB signals, amping, then upscaling.RGBSource wrote: Best quality is a good reason. While I can get excellent results using the AV-DRIVER + OSSC on 256px games, a full digital pipeline is always advantageous. Just wish he would sort 1080p output. Using the inner 216 lines is ok with people!
You can get the full 9-bit color index input (8 bit color index, 1 bit sprite/bg selection) to the palette mapper chip as well as syncs and pixel clock. The external hardware needs to do the palette mapping itself, but capturing CPU writes to the palette registers isn't that hard.cr4zymanz0r wrote:I wasn't even aware you could get the digital video signals from the PCE expansion port.
Would there really be that big of an improvement over simply using a DAC for audio? Analog audio is available on the same connector.Unseen wrote:You can get the full 9-bit color index input (8 bit color index, 1 bit sprite/bg selection) to the palette mapper chip as well as syncs and pixel clock. The external hardware needs to do the palette mapping itself, but capturing CPU writes to the palette registers isn't that hard.cr4zymanz0r wrote:I wasn't even aware you could get the digital video signals from the PCE expansion port.
Using the analog RGB signals for such a device would probably be more complicated than going the digital route. Unfortunately there is no simple way to do the same for sound without implementing a full sound chip emulation.
Check out page 39 of the GCVideo thread for some people who adamantly feel that digital audio sounds much better.Guspaz wrote:Would there really be that big of an improvement over simply using a DAC for audio? Analog audio is available on the same connector.
Complaining about the price is hardly a universally held opinion. What you are doing is more approaching group think.Guspaz wrote:Did I ever object to you providing information on the product? I objected to the product's pricepoint. You're in for a big surprise on the Internet if you think citing nearly universally held opinions is what trolling is.
I don't know, to me the big point would be to avoid including an ADC in the converter if it's easier to get/create a digital version of the sound signal. For the PCE, the ADC is really the simpler route, but for example with the Neo Geo the decision is not that simple (really weird sample rate that must be converted vs. analog).Guspaz wrote:Would there really be that big of an improvement over simply using a DAC for audio? Analog audio is available on the same connector.
From an implementor's point of view, 720p would probably be my second choice. The top one would be 2880x240 with an appropriate pixel repetition factor, but that does not have universal support.Hoagtech wrote:And who the F uses 720p?