Hello,
Is there such a thing already ?
Of course it's possible to do it after recording but can we do it "directly" like we can do with x264 ?
Furthermore, is an i7 4770k@4GHz + 16Gb Ram enough ?
On same setup with x264 It use 30-33% CPU.
Thanks.
h265/x265 + amarec (or anything?)
-
akumajo
- Posts: 542
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:37 am
h265/x265 + amarec (or anything?)
Last edited by akumajo on Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
blizzz
- Posts: 1150
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 6:19 pm
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: h265/x265 + amarec (or anything?)
You would need a vfw (video for windows) version. As far as I know that does not yet exist for x265.
-
akumajo
- Posts: 542
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:37 am
-
lettuce
- Posts: 1336
- Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:10 pm
- Location: Bedfordshire, England.
Re: h265/x265 + amarec (or anything?)
So whats the advantage of using 265 over 264?, i was under the impression that encoding times are double??
-
blizzz
- Posts: 1150
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 6:19 pm
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: h265/x265 + amarec (or anything?)
The advantage is that filesizes are smaller for the same quality. It's mostly useful for 4K resolution or higher.
-
lettuce
- Posts: 1336
- Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:10 pm
- Location: Bedfordshire, England.
Re: h265/x265 + amarec (or anything?)
Ok have just tried this with AmaRec and when i try and capture i get the following 2 error boxes pop up error
ICCompressBegin
x265vfw [error]:x256_encoder_openfailed
any idea?
ICCompressBegin
x265vfw [error]:x256_encoder_openfailed
any idea?