Yes, it works with Intel and NEC/Renesas USB 3.0 chipsets.Glossectomy wrote:Does the Micomsoft X-Capture 1 work with native Intel USB 3.0 chipsets?
http://micomsoft.co.jp/xcapture-1_spec.htm
Yes, it works with Intel and NEC/Renesas USB 3.0 chipsets.Glossectomy wrote:Does the Micomsoft X-Capture 1 work with native Intel USB 3.0 chipsets?
How would that work? (serious question)BazookaBen wrote:Aren't there some pretty cheap line-doublers out there you can use to convert 240p RGB from a SNES to 480p VGA or something?Mishrak109 wrote:Part of it was already having all of the equipment in order to stream via s-video, which is a bit more affordable than a full RGB capture setup. It was easier to restore the mini and at the time I had no aspirations of picking up an RGB monitor. I am going to try and pick up a PVM 205L this weekend and eventually I'll see how my older snes looks on it.
Good to hear. I purchased one for $240 and didnt consider that until afterwards.eightbitminiboss wrote:Yes, it works with Intel and NEC/Renesas USB 3.0 chipsets.Glossectomy wrote:Does the Micomsoft X-Capture 1 work with native Intel USB 3.0 chipsets?
http://micomsoft.co.jp/xcapture-1_spec.htm
$240 is a killer deal for it and even if you didn't have the right chipset on your motherboard, you could have easily gotten an expansion card with the right chipset and still come out under it's normal price.Glossectomy wrote:Good to hear. I purchased one for $240 and didnt consider that until afterwards.eightbitminiboss wrote:Yes, it works with Intel and NEC/Renesas USB 3.0 chipsets.Glossectomy wrote:Does the Micomsoft X-Capture 1 work with native Intel USB 3.0 chipsets?
http://micomsoft.co.jp/xcapture-1_spec.htm
Thanks!
Thanks, that's exactly what I'm talking about. I want to force MGS: Twin Snakes (PAL) to the best possible/feasable, progressive resolution but it nativly only supports 576i hence is not optimised for 480i. So from an aspect ratio point of view it always looks the same (small borders on top and bottom of the picture) no matter if I force 480p or 576p.Xan wrote:On a CRT that would certainly be the case, but on digital display setups it seems that overscan introduces moire on certain patterns. It might not be that noticeable during usage though.12345 wrote:Hi,
just a brief question:
If I use the Zoom function of my TV/xrgb to remove PAL boarders on 576i/p material, will I get a native, visible resolution of 480i/p or will this furhter decrease PQ?
Thanks!
There really isn't any 576p on 6th gen consoles though, unless you are talking about forcing it with Swiss on GC or such.
Intel USB 3.0 is the better solution anyway. The reason many Intel chipset boards have third-party USB 3.0 hardware is because Intel didn't have its own solution for a long while.Glossectomy wrote:Good to hear. I purchased one for $240 and didnt consider that until afterwards.eightbitminiboss wrote:Yes, it works with Intel and NEC/Renesas USB 3.0 chipsets.Glossectomy wrote:Does the Micomsoft X-Capture 1 work with native Intel USB 3.0 chipsets?
http://micomsoft.co.jp/xcapture-1_spec.htm
Thanks!
Sixfortyfive wrote:Why isn't USB 3.0 as "universal" as its predecessors, anyway? It seems to have more compatibility issues.
SourceIn theory, there should not be a problem at the hardware level. However, there may be a problem with the drivers or the underlying controller for the ports.
To determine if this is a hardware or software problem, try booting into a Linux live CD and see if USB 2.0 devices work in the USB 3.0 ports. If they do work, the problem is in the drivers. If not, the problem is in the hardware.
Legacy support in the BIOS only applies to systems that do not natively support USB in general. When this setting is enabled, the BIOS attempts to provide a compatibility layer for very old operating systems such as Windows 95 or MS-DOS, so that storage devices attached to these ports can be used (probably with some restrictions such as no hot-plugging). I'm not sure about this, but USB 3.0 legacy support setting is probably to allow USB 3.0 devices on such operating systems to communicate at USB 3.0 speeds. An operating system that supports USB should not be affected by these settings, as they can communicate with the USB hub controllers directly without having to rely on the BIOS.
shmups IRC wrote:wich linode wud u fuk
shmups IRC wrote:wich linode wud u fuk
2) Nothing, it just there to protect the contact point underneath the plating.Mishrak109 wrote:Two questions:
1) If I'm buying just a standard component video (w/o audio) cable, is there really any reason to spend more than $5 on it? I see some "higher quality" ones on Amazon for $10 and $11 and I'm just wondering if that quality improvement will matter.
2) What's the deal with gold plated RCA -> BNC adapters? Do they provide any noticeable increase in quality output over non-gold plated adapters?
shmups IRC wrote:wich linode wud u fuk
For the most part, no. Especially since the cable runs are so short.Mishrak109 wrote:1) If I'm buying just a standard component video (w/o audio) cable, is there really any reason to spend more than $5 on it? I see some "higher quality" ones on Amazon for $10 and $11 and I'm just wondering if that quality improvement will matter.
Strikers1945guy wrote:"Do we....eat chicken balls?!"
It's been a while since I tried but I'm sure HDLDump and/or HDLDumb can do this.Now I'd like to be able to snag those games back and try them in an emulator. Is it as simple as hooking the drive up to the PC and using some software to pull them back? What software would that be?
Nope, that's definitely not correct. Where are you seeing two RGB inputs here? http://www.hyperactivebroadcast.com/pub ... Rental.jpgBazookaBen wrote:Both the M2 and the L2 have 2 RGB inputs
Oh, there must be a difference between the M2U and the M2MDU. I have two 20M2MDU's, and they have 2 RGB inputs:Xan wrote:Nope, that's definitely not correct. Where are you seeing two RGB inputs here? http://www.hyperactivebroadcast.com/pub ... Rental.jpgBazookaBen wrote:Both the M2 and the L2 have 2 RGB inputs
Man, I hope not. I have two 20M2MDU's and one 20L2MD. Do the 20L2MD's have the P-22 as well? Have there been side by side tests to see if there is a noticeable difference in color accuracy between the P-22 and SMPTE-C? My monitors are pretty damn bright, I keep the contrast knob pretty low.Xan wrote:What's interesting: I have a PVM-1453MD, so one line older than the M-series, and it's actually HR Trinitron branded with 600 TVL. The M-series medical monitors have 600 TVL as well, but they have the lower grade P-22 phosphors instead of the SMPTE-C ones on mine... seems like a downgrade, unless they maybe figured the P-22 phosphors to be somehow better suited to medical tasks. They are more geared for light output than color accuracy, as far as I know.