

Makes me wonder if you could kill a snowman by slamming his carrot nose back into his brain

Well, I have to disagree, because to me, most that's being presented from the beginning (while being cool) is being used during the finale in a great way typical from Quentin Tarantino.Xyga wrote:I was underwhelmed, because the 'buildup' lasts most of the film, with lots of filler content that's here just because it's cool, and the problem is that you know what's coming.
Well, you're not really... (rest in spoiler)Spoiler
...prepared for the twist he's injected, but still you know where the film is going anyway.
And...shit no, actually you're warned just before the final scene that it won't be the same as in history (Tex says charlie told them to go to that house), and as cool as the final showdown is, I couldn't help but think the rest of the film is essentially a gallery show of that era and culture Tarantino is a nostalgic fan of.
RegalSin wrote:Street Fighters. We need to aviod them when we activate time accellerator.
Couldn't put my finger on anything specifically, but it seems to take longer to start than longer to end.it290 wrote: I'm curious what you think should be cut?
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
I think that's fair, although after the pivotal moment in the film you still have an hour or so left for the denouement, which I guess is appropriate for a three-act structure. If anything I think the slowness of the first third of the film kind of works in its favor, since it gives you an idea of the mundanity involved with being a low-level criminal (albeit one in this case who participates in some remarkable historical events). A lot of the stuff that gets set up in the first third of the movie gets paid off later on (the scene with the lawyer to cite one example) so if you were to make cuts there you'd probably half to cut both front and back. The length felt appropriate me for the scope of the story, but I definitely think Scorsese is criminal for not having added an intermission to the theatrical releaseGaijinPunch wrote:Couldn't put my finger on anything specifically, but it seems to take longer to start than longer to end.
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote:I'll make sure I'll download it illegally one day...
Well, the part with Bruce Lee (which funnily enough upset the Lee estate enough for them to post a statement about it on Facebook) was part ofsoprano1 wrote:Once Upon a Time in Holywood (2019)
God, what a mess of a story. Everything just goes all over the place, showing that one actress (and her disgusting feet, fuck you Quentin), and how pretty she is, and hey look some has-been just threw Bruce Lee into a fucking car, wow!![]()
That aside, I loved how they went ahead to portray the late 60's settings, down to the movies and TV shows. Shame Quentin also skipped what would my best personal part, filming with Corbucci. Oh well.
RegalSin wrote:Street Fighters. We need to aviod them when we activate time accellerator.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote:I'll make sure I'll download it illegally one day...
What exactly is your complaint with the story?soprano1 wrote:Once Upon a Time in Holywood (2019)
God, what a mess of a story. Everything just goes all over the place, showing that one actress (and her disgusting feet, fuck you Quentin), and how pretty she is, and hey look some has-been just threw Bruce Lee into a fucking car, wow!![]()
That aside, I loved how they went ahead to portray the late 60's settings, down to the movies and TV shows. Shame Quentin also skipped what would my best personal part, filming with Corbucci. Oh well.
You can read my no spoilers take on it. I'd say it's a step down from Goodfellas. Pesci seems somewhat reserved in his old age.dan76 wrote:I've been watching The Irishman for 30 minutes. I think I'm going to have to stop. It looks weird as fuck. How come deep fakes look better than this? Is it worth getting through or is it yet another step down from Goodfellas?
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
Honestly, that was the best part, finally seeing Pesci play someone other than the heavy. He's great in it.GaijinPunch wrote:You can read my no spoilers take on it. I'd say it's a step down from Goodfellas. Pesci seems somewhat reserved in his old age.dan76 wrote:I've been watching The Irishman for 30 minutes. I think I'm going to have to stop. It looks weird as fuck. How come deep fakes look better than this? Is it worth getting through or is it yet another step down from Goodfellas?
heli wrote:Why is milestone director in prison ?, are his game to difficult ?
It's Korean, but we have English subtitles, yes?soprano1 wrote:Parasite (2019)
The trailer made it seem like a comedy, but this is black humour at it's finest. Strongly recommended watching, the hype is real. A shame it probably won't be more widespread due to the language barrier.
I'm curious to hear your opinion of Kurosawa's "The Hidden Fortress."kane wrote:Watched the original Star Wars trilogy for the first time. What can I say, it's garbageI can perfectly see the historic value and nostalgia factor, though, especially for American kids of the era. It was an insufferable Sunday, but worthwhile for the educational value; so many memes were explained today.
And $13 avocado toast.Mischief Maker wrote:I'm curious to hear your opinion of Kurosawa's "The Hidden Fortress."kane wrote:Watched the original Star Wars trilogy for the first time. What can I say, it's garbageI can perfectly see the historic value and nostalgia factor, though, especially for American kids of the era. It was an insufferable Sunday, but worthwhile for the educational value; so many memes were explained today.
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
Yeah, like that, and with a smiley. Leave trolling to amateurs, pick a real fight like "COME AT ME NERDS!"Watched [insert whatever ancient reference material most members of this forum obviously love] for the first time. What can I say, it's garbage
Strikers1945guy wrote:"Do we....eat chicken balls?!"
Strikers1945guy wrote:"Do we....eat chicken balls?!"
R2 and C3PO basically are the two main guys from HF. Also HF is a better movie but you would expect that being a Kurosawa film.kane wrote:That's actually one I still haven't seen. But what's the connection?Mischief Maker wrote:I'm curious to hear your opinion of Kurosawa's "The Hidden Fortress."kane wrote:Watched the original Star Wars trilogy for the first time. What can I say, it's garbageI can perfectly see the historic value and nostalgia factor, though, especially for American kids of the era. It was an insufferable Sunday, but worthwhile for the educational value; so many memes were explained today.
Also, Parasite is indeed very good.
Back to the Future is actually good though. It has actual characters and features actual power struggles with actual personal stakes. (Stakes the audience can vicariously empathize with. Like Marty's precious chastity. Or Doc's internal organs.)Xyga wrote:In your place I'd have picked Back to the Future tho.
The first thing our hero does in the films is visit the illegal slave market to buy a couple of black market slaves. One of his slaves understandably tries to run away, and Luke the slave catcher goes after him.R2 and C3PO
Doing donuts away from the prior movie faster than Ecto-1! "Written by Dan Aykroyd and Harold Ramis," interesting that they went the tender nostalgic route (and that it was being plotted enough years ago for Ramis to be able to contribute).BryanM wrote:Well, at least the Ghostbusters: The New Batch trailer doesn't have anything like the "power of Patty" in it. It's actually refreshing it doesn't try to be "funny" or the standard star wars trailer...
RegalSin wrote:You can't even drive across the country Naked anymore