Vexorg wrote:I don't think the 2016 Ghostbusters movie was terrible, nor did it warrant all the political backlash it generated (although I think some of the reviews were judging the movie on its political correctness instead of its actual merits) but it was a very average movie overall. The big problem was that it couldn't decide if it wanted to be a followup to the originals or a completely separate movie, and suffered for its inability to make the distinction.
I'm going to disagree with you, here. It *was* terrible, and it was terrible primarily for one reason: the script sucked/was patently *not* funny.
It's absolutely amazing to me that these *severely* funny ladies would sign off on
a script that left them with absolutely terrible lines, devoid of real, actual humor. I didn't care *at all* that they were women...I cared that the whole thing, stem-to-stern, was patently unfunny. Oh! *SOUP DUMPLINGS*!!!! They can't...they can't get it *right*!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!
This movie was not good, but the stars are just as culpable in its failure: funny women of that caliber are easily able to ad lib and make script calls when they know stuff isn't landing, or won't land. They didn't, and the movie made them *all* look terrible. They have no one to blame but themselves. They went in for an easy payday, and now they're going to be working twice as hard to try to prop themselves back up to the point where they can call their shots again. The only one that *may* be immune to that is McCarthy, since she's already got
a proven track record of box office success. She may have earned her mulligan.
The others? Not so much (Wiig, McKinnon), to not at all (Jones).