Analog video types

The place for all discussion on gaming hardware
Post Reply
User avatar
OmegaFlareX
Posts: 884
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:15 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Analog video types

Post by OmegaFlareX »

I remember some people thought this picture was useful on the old forum so here it is again:

Image

I'm not a video engineer, so my information may be off. From what I understand, color video is made up of 6 components: Red, Green, Blue, Hsync, Vsync, and ground. Analog RGB and VGA (and VGA's variants, UGA, XGA, etc.) separate all of these on different lines, except for sync, which can sometimes be composite (combined) depending on the monitor.

Now, because all those signals are separate and the monitors have dedicated hardware to steer each signal to get it where it needs to be, the picture is perfect. As high quality as it possibly can be given the abilities of the transport (the cord used).

When you start moving up the chart and compressing signals, the picture quality degrades because special hardware inside the TV/monitor needs to "unzip" the signal information so it knows where to put it. The uncompression process isn't very accurate in most cases so lots of signal crossover occurrs, making the picture worse.

Starting from the highest quality, here's a brief description of the video types:

RGB/VGA - The best. If you're a serious gamer, this video type is what you should strive for. Let the casuals have their bleedy, grainy composite and RF signals. VGA is for the most part, a standard 15-pin short dsub, but RGB is not standard, so it may come in many different guises. The pics on the chart are three of the most common. As said above, sometimes the H and V syncs need to be combined, but usually on older monitors like the good ol' Commodores. Also, analog RGB refreshes horizontally at 15khz (interlaced) and VGA at 31khz (and higher, non-interlaced). The TV/monitor must be able to accomodate those rates to get a proper picture.

Component - Slightly compressed on three lines. I'm a bit hazy on the details of component video, so if someone knows more, please set me straight. The color green is determined by an algorithm in the TV/monitor's hardware, but Red and Blue are uncompressed. I don't know how the sync is carried, what the "Y" inputs purpose is, or the difference between Cb/Cr and Pb/Pr.

S-video - Compressed on two lines, one for color data (chroma) and one for brightness (luma). This eliminates "dot-crawl" found in composite and RF video, but some color-bleeding still occurrs. Also known as S-VHS, Luma/Chroma, and Y/C, but I'm not sure what the "Y" stands for.

Composite - Ah, the standard crap TV manufacturers have been pushing on us for decades. All 6 video components are squeezed into one line, and the picture is pretty bad, especially the color red, which bleeds like that elevator in The Shining. Yikes. Dot-crawl is also rampant, which is that flickery, anthill-looking effect on sprites and backgrounds.

RF - Here we are, the lowest of the low. Not only are all the video components crammed into one line, but all sound channels take up space here as well. Coaxial lines can carry a huge amount of pathways (300+ channels for cable TV, for example), but the video coming from your console only gets one (either channel 3 or 4). I'm shocked when I see people playing in RF when they have better, unused video inputs in their TVs. Not only that, but you have to PAY MONEY to get RF switches for your systems these days since they no longer come in the box.

If I left out anything important, please let me know.
dbd

-

Post by dbd »

I tried my PS2 on scart-RGB, and also on s-video, and on AV,

didn't notice any difference at all.
User avatar
dpful
Posts: 1205
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 5:19 pm
Location: SLC, UT, US
Contact:

Post by dpful »

it's easier to see on games with sprites.
You should have noticed a large difference in words and letters.
User avatar
Ghegs
Posts: 5056
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 6:18 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Post by Ghegs »

Hell, the difference is clear even on the PS2 browser screen. Are you (dbd) sure you had set the RGB on from PS2's settings?
No matter how good a game is, somebody will always hate it. No matter how bad a game is, somebody will always love it.

My videos
User avatar
OmegaFlareX
Posts: 884
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:15 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Re: -

Post by OmegaFlareX »

dbd wrote:didn't notice any difference at all.
Maybe you have one of those scart cables that doesn't really do RGB. I heard mention of those at the old board.

If that were true, it still wouldn't explain you not being able to tell the difference between Composite and S-video. Either your TV/monitor is messed up, or maybe you should call your eye doctor.
User avatar
Naiera
Posts: 419
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:41 pm
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Re: -

Post by Naiera »

dbd wrote:I tried my PS2 on scart-RGB, and also on s-video, and on AV,

didn't notice any difference at all.
You're blind. But after all the other things you've been writing here and on other forums, this comment doesn't surprise me.

There is a difference and that's a fact that's not up for discussion.
User avatar
Dave_K.
Posts: 4567
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 5:43 am
Location: SF Bay Area
Contact:

Re: -

Post by Dave_K. »

OmegaFlareX wrote:
dbd wrote:didn't notice any difference at all.
Maybe you have one of those scart cables that doesn't really do RGB. I heard mention of those at the old board.

If that were true, it still wouldn't explain you not being able to tell the difference between Composite and S-video. Either your TV/monitor is messed up, or maybe you should call your eye doctor.
I've seen cheap scart cables that only route composite and audio. Or it could be the case that the device used to interface scart only uses the composite video pin... Anyway, for a visual comparison between all three scroll down to the middle of this page: http://atarilabs.com/meat/2000/1201_videoprimer.shtml.
User avatar
captain ahar
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:03 pm
Location: #50 Bitch!

Post by captain ahar »

^that is incredible. i've never seen actual comparisons before. i am even more excited to switch to rgb.
I have no sig whatsoever.
User avatar
Neon
Posts: 3529
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:31 pm

Post by Neon »

After seeing RGB, I can't play in anything else except Component...even then there's a difference.

RGB (if you're an American) is like importing: Pretty big hassle, but totally worth it.

If you're european or japanese, you have absolutely no excuse not to use it and should be ashamed :wink:
User avatar
OmegaFlareX
Posts: 884
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:15 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Post by OmegaFlareX »

captain ahar wrote:^that is incredible. i've never seen actual comparisons before. i am even more excited to switch to rgb.
Make sure you get your Duo modded for RGB. Otherwise, you're stuck with an awesome console that has composite output only (which, amusingly, is sharper than Genesis composite).

Hopefully Matt will make his return soon. He's the one who modded mine. Great price for quality work.
Post Reply