Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a CRT)

The place for all discussion on gaming hardware
Post Reply
User avatar
xeos
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:38 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a CRT)

Post by xeos »

I just tested a cheap TCL TV, and found it pretty compelling as a CRT alternative (though I'm keeping my sony CRT as it's still preferable). Input lag was great. And paired with an OSSC, 480p/i upscaling was quite good. Full review here:

https://alantechreview.blogspot.com/202 ... t-lag.html

It also offered an opportunity to validate my piLagTesterPRO input lag results to those made by RTINGS, which might be of interest if you hesitate to trust some random reviewer on the internet ;-)
Last edited by xeos on Thu Apr 01, 2021 4:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
strayan
Posts: 671
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2017 8:33 pm

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by strayan »

I appreciate the effort you are going to with all these tests.

I’ve been (personally) searching for a low lag plasma TV for years now.
KayBur
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2021 1:35 pm

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by KayBur »

You can look at inexpensive monitors here https://homemakerguide.com/best-gaming- ... under-150/. Very budget options, you can choose something. In addition, there are monitors here not of some nameless companies, but models of goods of worthy and proven brands.
User avatar
xeos
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:38 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by xeos »

strayan wrote:I appreciate the effort you are going to with all these tests.

I’ve been (personally) searching for a low lag plasma TV for years now.
Thanks. I tested a few plasma TVs, the only one's I found worth having were the panasonic variety. You can find all the reviews on my blog.
User avatar
xeos
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:38 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by xeos »

KayBur wrote:You can look at inexpensive monitors here https://homemakerguide.com/best-gaming- ... under-150/. Very budget options, you can choose something. In addition, there are monitors here not of some nameless companies, but models of goods of worthy and proven brands.
honestly, the quality of those "reviews" is extremely low.
KayBur
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2021 1:35 pm

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by KayBur »

xeos wrote:
KayBur wrote:You can look at inexpensive monitors here https://homemakerguide.com/best-gaming- ... under-150/. Very budget options, you can choose something. In addition, there are monitors here not of some nameless companies, but models of goods of worthy and proven brands.
honestly, the quality of those "reviews" is extremely low.
Nobody bothers to look at other reviews, study the characteristics of those models that are presented in these reviews. You can also find something suitable.
User avatar
xeos
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:38 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by xeos »

KayBur wrote:
Nobody bothers to look at other reviews, study the characteristics of those models that are presented in these reviews. You can also find something suitable.
I think you are speaking for yourself here, and certainly not everybody. RTINGS is a pretty well known/popular website, for instance, that does real reviews.

They don't go into the details that retro gamers need, though, which is part of my why I've been doing the work I have.
User avatar
xeos
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:38 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by xeos »

strayan wrote:I appreciate the effort you are going to with all these tests.

I’ve been (personally) searching for a low lag plasma TV for years now.
update: I just finished tested a sanyo plasma today and it has pretty bad lag:

https://alantechreview.blogspot.com/202 ... g-and.html

at this point I've seen plasma displays from most of the major manufacturers and the only one that's low lag is Panasonic. have you seen evidence that there's any others?
User avatar
Guspaz
Posts: 3136
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 7:37 pm
Location: Montréal, Canada

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by Guspaz »

Are there really any advantages left for a plasma versus a modern OLED? I seem to recall there being some complaints about the way OLEDs handle refreshes, but I believe that was resolved when they got competent BFI.
User avatar
xeos
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:38 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by xeos »

Price is the obvious advantage I can think of, at least in a good sized city with lots of used TVs. But I've not played around with an OLED so I'm no expert on them. Seeing as how many Plasmas are crap, and Panasonic's are quite nice, I'm hesitant to make a blanket assumption that all OLEDs are good.
User avatar
Guspaz
Posts: 3136
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 7:37 pm
Location: Montréal, Canada

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by Guspaz »

There aren't many OLED TVs out there at the moment, and the panels are all made by LG. LG's OLEDs start at around $1,300 USD for the 48" CX model.

As far as I can tell, the only way to buy a decent sized plasma TV is via local sales/pickup. There's only a single large Panasonic plasma on sale on eBay at the moment, a 60" model for $2,000 USD with $9,000 USD shipping. But the "local pickup only" section on eBay has a ton of them for a few hundred bucks.
User avatar
xeos
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:38 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by xeos »

In the last two years I've gotten 3 Panasonic plasmas priced 0, 0 , and $15, USD. I do live in a good sized city, however. It would be insane to ship a plasma, they start at about 70lbs.
strayan
Posts: 671
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2017 8:33 pm

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by strayan »

Guspaz wrote:Are there really any advantages left for a plasma versus a modern OLED? I seem to recall there being some complaints about the way OLEDs handle refreshes, but I believe that was resolved when they got competent BFI.
The major appeal of plasma to me is the lower resolution. 480p and 768p plasma work really well with native 480p and line doubled or tripled 240p signals.
fernan1234
Posts: 2175
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2017 8:34 pm

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by fernan1234 »

strayan wrote:
Guspaz wrote:Are there really any advantages left for a plasma versus a modern OLED? I seem to recall there being some complaints about the way OLEDs handle refreshes, but I believe that was resolved when they got competent BFI.
The major appeal of plasma to me is the lower resolution. 480p and 768p plasma work really well with native 480p and line doubled or tripled 240p signals.
The advantage there is not the low resolution itself, but 1 to 1 pixel matching. If you can find figure out how to do pixel matching on a good current LCD or OLED you'd have all the advantages plus more (except the picture filling most/all of the screen).
User avatar
xeos
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:38 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by xeos »

fernan1234 wrote: The advantage there is not the low resolution itself, but 1 to 1 pixel matching. If you can find figure out how to do pixel matching on a good current LCD or OLED you'd have all the advantages plus more (except the picture filling most/all of the screen).
very true. In fact the 4k displays have the best chance of matching 480p without aliasing artifacts. Does that mean they take advantage of that? Probably not, but it is the ideal hardware for it. In all the 25+ tvs I've tested only like 3 had zero aliasing at 480p. Any many 720p displays have aliasing at native resolution, too. So disappointing.

The tv I started this tread with has near zero aliasing at 480p, and it's a 1080p display. BUT they ruin it by over-sharpening the result.
strayan
Posts: 671
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2017 8:33 pm

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by strayan »

xeos wrote:many 720p displays have aliasing at native resolution, too. So disappointing.
I don’t understand how all these companies managed to bungle 720p implementation (I can speculate though). Back in the early 2000’s when I was looking at my buying my first plasma I simply couldn’t find one that had 1:1 pixel matching. It was and still is a nightmare.
User avatar
Einzelherz
Posts: 1279
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 2:09 am

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by Einzelherz »

strayan wrote:
xeos wrote:many 720p displays have aliasing at native resolution, too. So disappointing.
I don’t understand how all these companies managed to bungle 720p implementation (I can speculate though). Back in the early 2000’s when I was looking at my buying my first plasma I simply couldn’t find one that had 1:1 pixel matching. It was and still is a nightmare.
iirc it's cause they were developing for computer resolutions and 768 wide was a normal one. The real question to me is where they came up with 720 which existed exactly no where.
KayBur
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2021 1:35 pm

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by KayBur »

xeos wrote:
KayBur wrote:
Nobody bothers to look at other reviews, study the characteristics of those models that are presented in these reviews. You can also find something suitable.
I think you are speaking for yourself here, and certainly not everybody. RTINGS is a pretty well known/popular website, for instance, that does real reviews.

They don't go into the details that retro gamers need, though, which is part of my why I've been doing the work I have.
Naturally, I share my thoughts on this or that topic. But I am not suggesting that my conclusions are true for everyone.
User avatar
xeos
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:38 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by xeos »

KayBur wrote:
KayBur wrote:
Nobody bothers to look at other reviews, study the characteristics of those models that are presented in these reviews. You can also find something suitable.
Naturally, I share my thoughts on this or that topic. But I am not suggesting that my conclusions are true for everyone.
Naturally. In the future when you say "nobody" I'll mentally substitute "speaking for myself only" ;-)
User avatar
xeos
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:38 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by xeos »

Einzelherz wrote: iirc it's cause they were developing for computer resolutions and 768 wide was a normal one. The real question to me is where they came up with 720 which existed exactly no where.
I agree that it must be because of the pre-existing 768 resolution. But was there ever a plasma computer monitor? there are plenty of lcd tvs which do 720 pixel perfect so the 768 thing isn't universal. you'd think that a technology only used for tvs would be designed for those demands exclusively..
User avatar
Unseen
Posts: 723
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by Unseen »

Einzelherz wrote:The real question to me is where they came up with 720 which existed exactly no where.
From this document, page 10:
Progressive scan systems at 1280 pixels per line and 720 lines per frame are also a member of the“720-pixel” family. 720 pixels x 4/3 (resolution improvement) x 4/3 (16:9 aspect ratio adjustment) =1280. Accommodating the Hollywood and computer communities’ request for “square-pixels”,meant that the number of lines should be 1280 x (9/16) = 720.
User avatar
BrianC
Posts: 8859
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:33 am
Location: MD

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by BrianC »

When I was staying at a hotel, I was surprised that the model of Toshiba LCD TV there is 720p, but couldn't handle 768p, unlike the HD TV I used to have.
Last edited by BrianC on Wed Apr 21, 2021 5:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
xeos
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:38 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by xeos »

Unseen wrote:From this document, page 10:
Wow that's a deep cut. The technical expertise of folks on this board always impresses.

Still doesn't explain why tv manufacturers continue to implement 720p with 768 panels though. obviously, it's momentum, but for how long??! And stupidity ;-)

At least 1080p tvs use 1080p panels (but often with over scan compensation, so often there's still aliasing).
fernan1234
Posts: 2175
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2017 8:34 pm

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by fernan1234 »

xeos wrote:At least 1080p tvs use 1080p panels (but often with over scan compensation, so often there's still aliasing).
This is somehow more confusing to me. Why is overscan still a thing in the fixed pixel display era, especially when most popular content is either 1080p or 4K which fits pixel perfect on virtually all, respectively, FHD and UHD TVs manufactured.
User avatar
Osirus
Posts: 214
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:51 pm

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by Osirus »

fernan1234 wrote:
xeos wrote:At least 1080p tvs use 1080p panels (but often with over scan compensation, so often there's still aliasing).
This is somehow more confusing to me. Why is overscan still a thing in the fixed pixel display era, especially when most popular content is either 1080p or 4K which fits pixel perfect on virtually all, respectively, FHD and UHD TVs manufactured.
Not sure. Some kind of backwards compatibility I suppose. There's usually a "Screen Fit" or other such named option in the TV to disable it.
User avatar
xeos
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:38 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by xeos »

Osirus wrote: Not sure. Some kind of backwards compatibility I suppose. There's usually a "Screen Fit" or other such named option in the TV to disable it.
about half the TVs I've reviewed (http://alantechreview.blogspot.com/2020 ... esult.html) do not have a setting that makes 1080p pixel perfect. Many brand names ones, too.
User avatar
vol.2
Posts: 2435
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 3:13 pm
Location: bmore

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by vol.2 »

xeos wrote:
Still doesn't explain why tv manufacturers continue to implement 720p with 768 panels though. obviously, it's momentum, but for how long??! And stupidity ;-)
They don't. AFAIK, they stopped making TV sized 720/768 panels a long time ago. When they were being made, a PC resolution for laptops in a conference room would have been an important feature. There are (or were at this point) at least a half dozen 768 plasma screens in the outgoing e-waste room in the office building I work in (I snagged one of the AKAI panels), so I know it was clearly a thing.
User avatar
xeos
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:38 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by xeos »

vol.2 wrote:
xeos wrote:
Still doesn't explain why tv manufacturers continue to implement 720p with 768 panels though. obviously, it's momentum, but for how long??! And stupidity ;-)
They don't. AFAIK, they stopped making TV sized 720/768 panels a long time ago. When they were being made, a PC resolution for laptops in a conference room would have been an important feature. There are (or were at this point) at least a half dozen 768 plasma screens in the outgoing e-waste room in the office building I work in (I snagged one of the AKAI panels), so I know it was clearly a thing.
Depends on your definition of long time ago. I've seen a 2015 panel that seemed to be >720, and probably was 768. Honestly, they don't make many 720p displays any more, and what are, are terribly budget.
User avatar
Einzelherz
Posts: 1279
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 2:09 am

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by Einzelherz »

Unseen wrote:
Einzelherz wrote:The real question to me is where they came up with 720 which existed exactly no where.
From this document, page 10:
Progressive scan systems at 1280 pixels per line and 720 lines per frame are also a member of the“720-pixel” family. 720 pixels x 4/3 (resolution improvement) x 4/3 (16:9 aspect ratio adjustment) =1280. Accommodating the Hollywood and computer communities’ request for “square-pixels”,meant that the number of lines should be 1280 x (9/16) = 720.
So the answer is 1. it was a number we were using on a different axis before and 2. it's a good divisible number.

I guess that's a reason.
User avatar
xeos
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:38 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Re: Cheap modern LCD for retro gamers (who can't also own a

Post by xeos »

Einzelherz wrote:
Unseen wrote:
Einzelherz wrote:The real question to me is where they came up with 720 which existed exactly no where.
From this document, page 10:
Progressive scan systems at 1280 pixels per line and 720 lines per frame are also a member of the“720-pixel” family. 720 pixels x 4/3 (resolution improvement) x 4/3 (16:9 aspect ratio adjustment) =1280. Accommodating the Hollywood and computer communities’ request for “square-pixels”,meant that the number of lines should be 1280 x (9/16) = 720.
So the answer is 1. it was a number we were using on a different axis before and 2. it's a good divisible number.
I suspect this is the real reason, even if the document doesn't admit it:

720/480 = 1.5

which makes for a very good divisible number (though not as great as 960, which would have been the best by far).
Post Reply