Movies you've just watched

A place where you can chat about anything that isn't to do with games!
User avatar
Steamflogger Boss
Posts: 3075
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2017 3:29 pm
Location: Eating the Rich

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Steamflogger Boss »

drauch wrote:Ikiru is probably my favorite. I've seen a chunk, but I'd probably buy more of his films if someone like Eureka or Arrow would put them out. Funny I can import their stuff from across the ocean and get almost two films with on par transfers for the price of a Criterion on sale. But aye, guess when you've got the dominant market for quality transfers since laser disc you don't need to go down in price.
Yeah Criterion prices suck. I'm not averse to buying them used when possible but in general it isn't much cheaper so I buy new. I got lucky and snagged an amazon warehouse copy of Kagemusha for $13 though. Meanwhile I can go buy something like The Quiet Man on BD for $13 new whenever, because it's not Criterion.

Are Eureka BD releases region free? I have a nice region free DVD player but it still seems quite annoying for BD.

@Charlie: I rewatched the first Jaws not that long ago. A solid movie, and it's unintentionally funny at this point, at least to me.
User avatar
drauch
Posts: 5638
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 6:14 am

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by drauch »

Nah, Eureka is Region B. I bought a region free a couple of years ago for around 120ish I think. Well worth it. A lot of quality releases from all over the globe nowadays.
BIL wrote: "Small sack, LOTS OF CUM" - Nikola Tesla
User avatar
Steamflogger Boss
Posts: 3075
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2017 3:29 pm
Location: Eating the Rich

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Steamflogger Boss »

Figured but oh well, I do plan to get one eventually.
boagman
Posts: 1345
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:30 am

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by boagman »

BrianC wrote:
Sinful wrote:Peter Jackson action scenes, seriously. The one thing I wish the Tolkien movies by him didn't have. Pure blank out moments and best examples of blanking out moments off the top of my head. If those movies had all those endless spectacle battles going on forever replaced with more actual and meaningful content from the books, they would have been so much better.
Especially with The Hobbit, which was shorter than just one of the Lord of the Rings books, but was made into three movies.
I watched that, in the theater, in the special 70mm (or whatever it was...) printing with the special camera via the special projector...and nothing saves a bad movie. In fact, if anything, the shininess of everything took away from the visual look of the thing.

The far, far greater sin, though was the script. Taking that small book and bloating it into three in the same way foie gras is made, was patently awful, and a sin which could only be attributed to Jackson's hubris at that point. Don't misunderstand: I still think he earned every bit of the accolades he received for his LOTR trilogy, and the money they made. However, it obviously went to his head, and "Hobbit" was bad enough that I didn't (and still haven't) seen either of the two follow-up movies in any fashion, paid or free.

When you make something into something that it isn't, while still calling it by its name, you're off the reservation.
User avatar
Sinful
Posts: 473
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:47 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Sinful »

Can't believe you guys are making me stick up for Peter Jackson, but you need to look into the production of The Hobbit Trilogy before slagging so much hate on him alone. The prepping started with Del Toro and was originally meant for only two movies. When Del Toro left the project, Jackson came in near the end of pre-production and basically had to wing it on the fly while filming because the studios didn't want to give him more time, plus studio demanded three movies on top of it to save on production costs. Harsh contrast to having all the time in the world to prepare for TLotRs Trilogy.

Image

Here's a short Nov.19 2015 article titled "Peter Jackson Explains Why the ‘Hobbit’ Movies Are Such a Huge Mess"; http://www.slashfilm.com/peter-jackson- ... -problems/

And a short 6 min video explaining this further (same video from that article); https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20vA9U7J2qQ
User avatar
gameoverDude
Posts: 2269
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 12:28 am
Contact:

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by gameoverDude »

Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith - Caught it on TV last night. Probably the best out of the prequel trilogy.
Kinect? KIN NOT.
User avatar
BrianC
Posts: 8875
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:33 am
Location: MD

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by BrianC »

Steamflogger Boss wrote: Are Eureka BD releases region free? I have a nice region free DVD player but it still seems quite annoying for BD.
Some BFI releases are, at least on the BD side. I have their Lon Chaney Sr. Phantom of the Opera BD release (with 1925 and 1929 silent versions) and the BD is region free. The other discs are region 2, one of which is the film and same extras as the BD and the other is a DVD only documentary.
User avatar
EmperorIng
Posts: 5065
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 3:22 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by EmperorIng »

charlie chong wrote:to lower the tone a little i watched jaws 3. i think i might become obsessed with this film like i was when i was a kid.
jaws 3 can swim backwards and she also growls it is quite amazing.
i've always wanted to watch it in 3d and now it has been released in that format but i have no 3d tv :cry:
It uh, truly must be a sight to behold to see this bad boy coming at the screen. It's like you're really there!!!

Speaking of regions for Blu Rays, I was so happy to find out that the Jaws 2, 3D, 4: the Revenge BluRay pack (yup all the shitty Jaws movies in one place!) was region-free, allowing me to indulge in my love of rubber shark heads and place this respectable bunch next to my other shark movie collection: the valiant effort (with awesome cast) Orca, the shamelessly shameless L'Ultimo Squalo, the shot-on-shitteo Great White (set in Nevada!!!!), and the incomprehensibly stupid Night of the Sharks, where more characters are seemingly killed by cartoonish cross-hair overlays than the actual shark, who is the stealth hero of the story (killing mobsters and worthless gold-digging bitches, and the only thanks he gets is to be blown up - what a rip). Needless to say, all of these are worth at least one watch! Except for maybe Great White... you gotta be in the right mood to watch it ("I got all these fuckin' shark movies and I'm gunna watch them, damn it!").
User avatar
GaijinPunch
Posts: 15660
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 11:22 pm
Location: San Fransicso

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by GaijinPunch »

charlie chong wrote:to lower the tone a little i watched jaws 3.
True Confession: I saw it at the theater.
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
User avatar
Zen
Banned User
Posts: 1072
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:36 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Zen »

The Shape of Water (2017) - Guillermo del Toro

Guillermo del Toro wantonly debases his craft and irredeemably disgraces himself, in a film so seemingly hungry form Oscar glory, that it cannibalises itself via grotesque, relentless and hysterical signalling.

The infantile liberal colours, obvious but to a certain degree under control in his other films, here erupt completely and uncontrollably onto and all over the viewer.

The script is moronic, the characters borderline retarded and the morality childlike.
Remember that tap dancing scene in Young Frankenstein?
Spoiler
Image
The ending, well, Trans is so yesterday;
Spoiler
Try Trans-Species
The shape of water because, you know, reality is "fluid".


This is all sugar coated in beautifully realised 1960's imagery.

One would be hard pressed to cite a more perfect representation of the regressive cult of Hollywood than this saccharine coated shit pill marching its way to self congratulatory Oscars hubris.
Image
User avatar
BrianC
Posts: 8875
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:33 am
Location: MD

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by BrianC »

GaijinPunch wrote:
charlie chong wrote:to lower the tone a little i watched jaws 3.
True Confession: I saw it at the theater.
I didn't see Jaws 3, but I did see the infamous Robocop 3 in the theater.
User avatar
drauch
Posts: 5638
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 6:14 am

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by drauch »

Sinful wrote:Can't believe you guys are making me stick up for Peter Jackson, but you need to look into the production of The Hobbit Trilogy before slagging so much hate on him alone.
Don't care. There's not a minute in those movies that isn't awful. Anyone who strays this far from their roots gets no respect from me. He's a corporate shill now. Bad Taste, indeed!
BIL wrote: "Small sack, LOTS OF CUM" - Nikola Tesla
User avatar
BryanM
Posts: 6143
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 3:46 am

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by BryanM »

Directors don't make AAA movies, movie studios do.

If you want to see something with blood pumping through its veins, go to the world of Youtube.

A magical place where niche stuff like gorny Henshin Hero movies can be witnessed, which no film conglomerate would fund in a million years.
User avatar
Steamflogger Boss
Posts: 3075
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2017 3:29 pm
Location: Eating the Rich

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Steamflogger Boss »

Throne of Blood

I'd put it right up there with but slightly behind Seven Samurai and Rashomon. Really good movie.
boagman
Posts: 1345
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:30 am

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by boagman »

Sinful wrote:A bunch o' stuff about PJ & The Bear
Sorry. He's the honcho, here. It's *his* baby. I don't fault those who don't like some of the idiocy that Ridley Scott's done in his recent "Alien" whatever-they-ares, as those are *his* baby. You can't divorce the guy who got all the credit for the originals from the appalling nature that he's taken to the follow-ups.

Look: "Hobbit" isn't really enough to do two movies, much less three. Jackson was *completely* in "Write Your Own Ticket Land" with the movie studios. He could have told them that he wanted to do a love story musical about Ted Kozinski with Joan Collins in the title role with the soundtrack put together by The Wiggles, and he'd have been financed, just on the off chance that he could make it work! He earned his credentials and his accolades.

"Hobbit" was ill-conceived from the start. There's taking license with a source, and there's adding entirely new stories, characters, plotlines, entire high school marching band parades...what *didn't* he bastardize that book with? Seeing that movie made me sad...sad that Jackson couldn't make Tolkien's book come alive without putting in so very much *garbage* of his own. The White Orc? The Troll King? All this added BS, for no reason other than to increase run time to make extra movies.

Lucas gets criticized for his prequels, and rightly so. Jackson's prequels should be criticized more so, or at least as much, if only because he had some nice source work to begin with, and decided that it would be better if he set it on fire. Lucas had to come up with his own stuff...Jackson added his own stuff and crapped the bed in historic fashion.
User avatar
charlie chong
Posts: 1517
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 12:19 pm
Location: borders

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by charlie chong »

GaijinPunch wrote:
charlie chong wrote:to lower the tone a little i watched jaws 3.
True Confession: I saw it at the theater.
fap fap
i remember seeing the poster advertising it at the cinema when i was 3??? and a babysitter watching it but being that young it is more of dream than a memory. i do remember watching the first one on tv when i was 5/6 it was terrifying but i loved it
Last edited by charlie chong on Wed Feb 28, 2018 9:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
charlie chong
Posts: 1517
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 12:19 pm
Location: borders

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by charlie chong »

EmperorIng wrote:
charlie chong wrote:to lower the tone a little i watched jaws 3. i think i might become obsessed with this film like i was when i was a kid.
jaws 3 can swim backwards and she also growls it is quite amazing.
i've always wanted to watch it in 3d and now it has been released in that format but i have no 3d tv :cry:
It uh, truly must be a sight to behold to see this bad boy coming at the screen. It's like you're really there!!!

Speaking of regions for Blu Rays, I was so happy to find out that the Jaws 2, 3D, 4: the Revenge BluRay pack (yup all the shitty Jaws movies in one place!) was region-free, allowing me to indulge in my love of rubber shark heads and place this respectable bunch next to my other shark movie collection: the valiant effort (with awesome cast) Orca, the shamelessly shameless L'Ultimo Squalo, the shot-on-shitteo Great White (set in Nevada!!!!), and the incomprehensibly stupid Night of the Sharks, where more characters are seemingly killed by cartoonish cross-hair overlays than the actual shark, who is the stealth hero of the story (killing mobsters and worthless gold-digging bitches, and the only thanks he gets is to be blown up - what a rip). Needless to say, all of these are worth at least one watch! Except for maybe Great White... you gotta be in the right mood to watch it ("I got all these fuckin' shark movies and I'm gunna watch them, damn it!").
i've seen a few of those.. there are even more i think too .. i love animals attacking films .. night of the demon is a good one where there's a woman who the bigfoot impregnated :lol: i think the bigfoot kills everyone cos someone dug up the crossbred babys grave
User avatar
Zen
Banned User
Posts: 1072
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:36 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Zen »

This mini documentary is tongue in cheek?!
So basically what one is watching here is the industry itself, explaining away the their own bullshit.
Seems legit.

Watching these hustlers whine, adds an extra layer of fuckery to the whole farce. Truly, this video with its fawning Peter Jackson apologetics, replete with Howard Shore score, is disgusting.
I would encourage all who have not watched it, to do so. Its basically "The Hobbit 4 - we shat on you in 1, 2 and 3 - now were gonna wipe our ass with you!".
Well played, Peter, well played.

Everyone involved knew exactly what they were producing, every step of the way.

Jakson's power, via his standing within the industry, allowed him to walk at any time.
These jokers knowingly feed an audience, primed on brand value/loyalty, a big shit sandwich and now we get the "please understand" documentaries?

What absolute bollocks!
Image
User avatar
GaijinPunch
Posts: 15660
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 11:22 pm
Location: San Fransicso

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by GaijinPunch »

charlie chong wrote: fap fap
i remember seeing the poster advertising it at the cinema when i was 3??? and a babysitter watching it but being that young it is more of dream than a memory. i do remember watching the first one on tv when i was 5/6 it was terrifying but i loved it
The best thing about 3d at this time is that it was basically just a normal movie you watched with red/blue glasses, an there was about 2 scenes where a fish/shark would swim right at you. Oh, the 80's.
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
User avatar
Skykid
Posts: 17646
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 2:16 pm
Location: Planet Dust Asia

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Skykid »

Sinful wrote:When Cameron envisions a movie, he fully envision it from ground up. This is why his movies come out exactly how he envisioned them.
But it's not enough. He has plenty of creative talent, but he's far from a master of film. I'd argue Scott's best are more artistically accomplished than anything Cameron could ever, or has ever, achieved.

And that's not to say Cameron is bad, on the contrary, he's great at what he's good at: pure distilled Hollywood commercial adventure. The problem is that he occasionally fumbles that slightly too with poor writing, bad casting and average actors. I mean, Avatar is pretty much fucking awful. The dialogue is like fingernails down a blackboard, the premise is a cliche of a cliche of a template that was designed to be a cliche. It's most definitely one of his worst films.

As much as I love Aliens, I can see its flaws; and T2 gets increasingly worse as time goes on.

On a completely contrary note: I'll never understand why people hate Titanic to such a degree. Is it the schlocky nature of its premise? The manipulative nature of its drama? Because it's guilty of all those things and more, but it remains undoubtedly one of Cameron's most all-round accomplished movies. Within the man's remit, it's right at the top of the pile in terms of successful assembly. How long has it been since any of you actually sat down and watched it? I went to see it recently in the theatre for the anniversary re-release and yes, it's a completely Hollywood, superficial adventure movie; just one that happens to be brilliantly put together and one of the best examples of its kind. It is exactly as it's intended to be, and it succeeds better than most at being just that.
Always outnumbered, never outgunned - No zuo no die

User avatar
Sinful
Posts: 473
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:47 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Sinful »

Zen wrote:
These jokers knowingly feed an audience, primed on brand value/loyalty, a big shit sandwich and now we get the "please understand" documentaries?
The reality of things is to make crappy quick rushed products and market the heck out of them to hide their shortcomings. That's all you have to understand, brainwashing rules the world and allows you to get away with murder.
Skykid wrote:
Sinful wrote:When Cameron envisions a movie, he fully envision it from ground up. This is why his movies come out exactly how he envisioned them.
But it's not enough. He has plenty of creative talent, but he's far from a master of film. I'd argue Scott's best are more artistically accomplished than anything Cameron could ever, or has ever, achieved.

And that's not to say Cameron is bad, on the contrary, he's great at what he's good at: pure distilled Hollywood commercial adventure. The problem is that he occasionally fumbles that slightly too with poor writing, bad casting and average actors. I mean, Avatar is pretty much fucking awful. The dialogue is like fingernails down a blackboard, the premise is a cliche of a cliche of a template that was designed to be a cliche. It's most definitely one of his worst films.

As much as I love Aliens, I can see its flaws; and T2 gets increasingly worse as time goes on.

On a completely contrary note: I'll never understand why people hate Titanic to such a degree. Is it the schlocky nature of its premise? The manipulative nature of its drama? Because it's guilty of all those things and more, but it remains undoubtedly one of Cameron's most all-round accomplished movies. Within the man's remit, it's right at the top of the pile in terms of successful assembly. How long has it been since any of you actually sat down and watched it? I went to see it recently in the theatre for the anniversary re-release and yes, it's a completely Hollywood, superficial adventure movie; just one that happens to be brilliantly put together and one of the best examples of its kind. It is exactly as it's intended to be, and it succeeds better than most at being just that.
Liking his movies or not, the point is he's visions fully come out just the way he imagined them.
User avatar
Xyga
Posts: 7181
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 8:22 pm
Location: block

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Xyga »

His name is Jaaaaames, James Cameron
The bravest pioneer
No budget too steep, no sea too deep
Who's that?
It's him, James Camerooooon
James, James Cameron explorer of the sea
With a dying thirst to be the first
Could it be? Yeah that's him!
James Cameron
Strikers1945guy wrote:"Do we....eat chicken balls?!"
User avatar
drauch
Posts: 5638
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 6:14 am

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by drauch »

Avatar isn't shit 'cause the studios made it and one man at the helm can't be to blame.
BIL wrote: "Small sack, LOTS OF CUM" - Nikola Tesla
User avatar
Zen
Banned User
Posts: 1072
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:36 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Zen »

Sinful wrote:brainwashing rules the world and allows you to get away with murder
You said it, brother.
Image
User avatar
Zen
Banned User
Posts: 1072
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:36 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Zen »

Skykid wrote:On a completely contrary note: I'll never understand why people hate Titanic to such a degree. Is it the schlocky nature of its premise? The manipulative nature of its drama? Because it's guilty of all those things and more, but it remains undoubtedly one of Cameron's most all-round accomplished movies. Within the man's remit, it's right at the top of the pile in terms of successful assembly. How long has it been since any of you actually sat down and watched it? I went to see it recently in the theatre for the anniversary re-release and yes, it's a completely Hollywood, superficial adventure movie; just one that happens to be brilliantly put together and one of the best examples of its kind. It is exactly as it's intended to be, and it succeeds better than most at being just that.
I'll take a crack off of that.

(First, TLDR; one word answer; TASTE)

Disclaimers;
I've never seen Titanic (1997) from start to finish in one sitting. Obviously, this is because I am drug free. I also have not seen the very end of the film.
Second, a little story;
I was born and raised at the ships last port of call.
One of the Centenary remembrances at the port, was an all ticket affair. On each of those tickets was printed the name of one of the passengers of the Titanic.
An attendee who took their children, told me that at the end of the night when leaving, ticket holders whose tickets held the name of a passenger allocated according to the attendees sex,
presented the ticket and were then informed (children and all) if they had perished or not.

All of which is, of course, in no way to say that there is anything wrong with making a film about the sinking.
A Night to Remember (1958) - Roy Ward Baker (from which Cameron lifted with abandon) is a favourite of mine. The "Cameronization" of it, is another thing altogether.

I think people recognise that this event is not like a generic war story, with which "artistic" licence can be taken.
The sinking is a very specific tragedy and I think some were put off by the idea of the "boy" DiCaprio, ring master Cameron, shrill sphincter mouthed Dion and James Horner,
making a three ringed circus out of it.

Now, if none of this is of the slightest concern and one is just judging the film on a check list of "what makes a good film", one can easily miss why many people would viscerally dislike the film.

So, no, ones "heart will not go on".
It went down 12,500 feet, in freezing waters, on a moonless night, 15 April 1912, to the bottom, 370 miles off Newfoundland and James Cameron can kiss my Irish arse.
Image
User avatar
Sinful
Posts: 473
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:47 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Sinful »

drauch wrote:Avatar isn't shit 'cause the studios made it and one man at the helm can't be to blame.
Thought I've been always saying James Cameron is the only director in total control?... Personally only movie I didn't enjoy by him is Titanic, though had a girl once who her fave movie was Titanic, ironically.

As for Avatar... why isn't this actor crazy mainstream popular?
Image

This is the one thing today's movies are desperatly missing, total charismatic badasses. Why today's Hollywood loves their forgettable twinks like the emo Kylo Ren from Star Wars... oh right, nvm. :roll:



Once everyone was speculating that Stephen Lang should be picked to play Cable in next Deadpool movie. He was even gunning for the role.
Image

Course some forgettable actor that doesn't even look like Cable got the role instead.
Image
User avatar
Steamflogger Boss
Posts: 3075
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2017 3:29 pm
Location: Eating the Rich

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Steamflogger Boss »

This is the best thing associated with Titanic including the movie itself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2WH8mHJnhM
User avatar
Jonny2x4
Posts: 485
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2018 1:47 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Jonny2x4 »

Sinful wrote:
This is the one thing today's movies are desperatly missing, total charismatic badasses. Why today's Hollywood loves their forgettable twinks like the emo Kylo Ren from Star Wars... oh right, nvm. :roll:
The Kylo Ren character might seem like a twink, but his actor (Adam Driver) is actually a former Marine, which is nothing to scoff at. Plus any actor who has to pretend to be attracted to Lena Dunham must have a really strong stomach.
User avatar
Sinful
Posts: 473
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:47 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Sinful »

Jonny2x4 wrote:
Sinful wrote:
This is the one thing today's movies are desperatly missing, total charismatic badasses. Why today's Hollywood loves their forgettable twinks like the emo Kylo Ren from Star Wars... oh right, nvm. :roll:
The Kylo Ren character might seem like a twink, but his actor (Adam Driver) is actually a former Marine, which is nothing to scoff at. Plus any actor who has to pretend to be attracted to Lena Dunham must have a really strong stomach.
He could be the next Bruce Lee, if it doesn't come off on screen, then what's the point. This is the movie business we're talking about.

Image

^ Now Clint wasn't some hardened Kung Fu master, but he didn't have to be, his on screen presence was bar none just standing there in the breeze.
User avatar
Jonny2x4
Posts: 485
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2018 1:47 pm

Re: Movies you've just watched

Post by Jonny2x4 »

I wish his son Scott was in a decent movie for once, but he's been in nothing but straight-to-VOD trash.
Post Reply