Zen wrote:
Third; the sugar coated cyanide that is Tom Hanks (Hanks really is Hollywood's own boy. When they want to fuck you good, they bring out Tommy.
Case in point: Saving Private Ryan, which has its own
subtle dark side to it, wrapped up in Tom Hanks "earnestness." Maybe it's because I saw Forrest Gump too many times as
a kid when my parents played it, but I can't stand the guy's acting (or rather, lack of it).
Big is ok, though.
What I watched recently:
Macbeth (1948) by Orson Welles.
This one is good, but weird. It was shot in 3 weeks - it looks that way in
a sense, because of how few locations there are in the movie (one location with an arch and stairways is used
a lot). In that sense it is very theatrical. Some of the costumes look cheap (like the crowns), but this can be overlooked.
The thing that sticks out about the movie the most is its lighting and set design. The lighting is heavy on shadow, which makes everything look expressionistic and moody. More so though are the sets, which make Scotland look like some hellish, unforgivable wasteland (can some UK'ers confirm this?). The castles look like they are made out of mud, carved into the hill. Everything looks soggy, dirty, and slimy. What an effect! But who would willingly want to live in this world, let alone be king of it? It is really
a unique take on the setting, with even the presence of Christianity only seeming perfunctory and half-pagan already. The movie tellingly opens with the Weird Sisters digging into their muddy cauldron, to shape
a dirty, wet statuette of Macbeth out of clay. We're stuck deep in the mud of human darkness for this one.
Some screens:
Apparently studio execs complained about the Scottish brogue compounding the difficulty of Shakespeare, but these fears are so extremely misplaced, given that it already feels as if the script was polished from the original to improve its understandability. The accents are
a non-issue. The studios redubbed the movie and cut 30 minutes out for the USA release, which no one liked. Go figure. Original version (which is on
a blu ray I picked up released by Olive Signature) is the way to go. All in all it's
a fantastic movie, though not the masterpiece that Chimes at Midnight/Falstaff would be for Welles.
I picked up
a lot of 70s movies I hope to watch and buff up on that decade. I've never seen Apocalypse Now, for example, so I picked up the box set (coincidentally with
a Welles reading of Heart of Darkness). Though I want to read Heart of Darkness before I jump in the movie.