DoDonPachi 2010 (New thread #5)

=SNC= · Joined: 02 Apr 2010 Posts: 61

Lets have yet another credit at DoDonPachi!!!

1 credit only, all options default (except autofire, which is allowed). For the moment, I accept scores starting from 40 millions.

I may ask you for an replay (.inp file) at my discretion to confirm your score, so if you're scoring high (especially over 100,000,000) I would ask you to record your runs.
Obviously for people not using MAME, a photo of the high score board will suffice.
I encourage EVERYONE to register their runs, let's contribute to the community!

I will most likely accept one showing a similar score; this is just to avoid drama like in previous threads. For recording inps many people use WolfMAME version 0.99. Later versions don't seem to support save states in Dodonpachi, for those of you that like to practice that way.

THIS JUST IN: lagless MAME removes 1 frame of input lag from DDP, leaving only 1 (the minimum possible). I haven't tried it myself, but supposedly it's a whole new playing experience, and of course I will accept inps recorded with this version.

If anyone takes first place (lol) they will require an inp of the successful run. There is now a selection of replays available for download at the bottom.

Scores in the following format please:
Name - Score - Type - Area - Max Hit

Code:

Rank  Name              Score         Type  Stage  Hit
-------------------------------------------------------
 1    PROMETHEUS        547,501,230   A-L   ALL    854
 2    Erppo             254,708,360   C-S   2-7    777
 3    .ASP              232,849,860   C-L   2-5    778
 4    LtC               168,714,430   C-L   2-6    772
 5    AST-BR1           149,027,230   C-S   2-4    790
 6    Javel             139,926,940   C-S   2-6    532
 7    S.S               135,552,940   A-L   2-7    497
 8    ncp               134,467,590   C-S   2-3    810
 9    RWM               133,405,190   A-L   2-4    677 
10    Ravid             128,462,490   B-L   2-4    491
11    Malik11           120,733,880   A-L   2-4    485      
12    MrMonkeyMan       120,484,130   A-L   2-5    406
13    Fu                118,879,970   A-L   2-4    565
14    FraGMarE          115,558,560   B-L   2-3    450
15    Zerst             110,724,980   C-S   2-5    396
16    SWT!              105,621,740   C-S   2-4    396
17    DAD               102,957,870   A-L   2-3    467
18    neo                95,459,660   B-L   2-2    685
19    Aliquantic         93,089,410   C-S   2-4    409
20    Sapz               92,269,180   A-L   2-5    478
21    CRI                89,882,890   A-L   2-4    483
22    Buttman            87,020,010   C-S   2-4    393
23    nii-san            86,269,600   C-S   2-3    459
24    orange             85,438,120   C-S   2-3    367
25    AST-POW            85,028,640   C-S   2-3    478
26    toby               84,188,360   C-S   2-3    402
27    winteR             81,110,440   A-L   2-6    ???
28    Vorpal             79,643,210   C-S   1-6    407
29    stanski            78,858,960   A-L   2-3    488
30    Sasupoika          76,001,810   C-S   2-4    337
31    Dave K.            74,010,010   C-S   2-4    276
32    jeremycarrier      70,090,250   C-S   1-6    400
33    dar                68,380,410   A-L   2-2    400
34    Smraedis           67,393,380   C-S   2-3    338
35    drboom             67,086,640   C-S   2-3    386
36    BBH                66,267,510   C-L   2-3    222
37    chempop            64,059,320   C-S   2-3    295
38    Azinth             63,604,640   A-L   2-3    463
39    freddiebamboo      59,269,350   C-S   2-2    302
40    charlie chong      58,881,090   C-S   2-2    389
41    viniciusvbf        58,776,820   C-S   2-2    263
42    spl                56,991,100   A-L   1-6    ???
43    MJR                59,053,680   C-S   2-2    393
44    Third_strike       56,765,030   C-S   2-2    267
45    Dunpeal2064        55,363,410   C-S   2-2    480
46    linko9             55,059,480   A-L   2-1    464
47    Vincere            54,408,150   C-S   2-2    399
48    sven666            52,792,770   C-S   1-6    394
49    Nailgun            52,711,340   A-L   2-2    312
50    Edge               52,631,000   C-S   1-6    370
51    BUHA               52,333,520   C-S   1-6    414
52    moozooh            50,590,860   C-S   2-1    287
53    AVE                49,390,320   A-L   2-1    471
54    Prales             48,857,000   B-S   1-6    493
55    Galdur             48,667,070   A-L   2-3    345
56    Barklund           47,943,880   C-S   1-All  317
57    bkk                46,942,790   A-L   2-1    302
58    ASR                46,649,840   C-S   1-6    323
59    Shalnn             44,498,300   A-L   2-2    301
60    Tomtom             43,793,900   A-L   2-2    298
61    ptoing             43,395,570   C-S   1-All  237
62    spongdangly        43,378,610   C-S   1-6    400
63    Dann               43,055,210   C-S   1-6    280
64    Necronopticus      42,982,070   C-S   2-1    335
65    shoe-sama          42,683,040   C-S   1-All  254
66    Bydoslave          42,117,110   C-S   1-6    395
67    IlMrm              41,986,670   C-S   2-2    400
68    ArrogantBastard    41,480,710   A-L   1-6    389
69    Pulsewidth         41,227,960   C-S   1-All  287

INDIVIDUAL TYPE TABLES

Type A

Code:

Rank  Name              Score         Type  Stage  Hit
-------------------------------------------------------
 1     PROMETHEUS        547,501,230   A-L   ALL    854
 2     S.S               135,552,940   A-L   2-7    497 
 3     RWM               133,405,190   A-L   2-4    677 
 4     Malik11           120,733,880   A-L   2-4    485
 5     MrMonkeyMan       120,484,130   A-L   2-5    406

Type B

Code:

Rank  Name              Score         Type  Stage  Hit
-------------------------------------------------------
 1     PROMETHEUS        148,277,600   B-L   2-6    473
 2     Ravid             128,462,490   B-L   2-4    491
 3     FraGMarE          115,558,560   B-L   2-3    450
 4     neo                95,459,660   B-L   2-2    685
 5     

Type C

Code:

Rank  Name              Score         Type  Stage  Hit
-------------------------------------------------------
 1     Erppo             254,708,360   C-S   2-7    777
 2     .ASP              232,849,860   C-L   2-5    778
 3     LtC               168,714,430   C-L   2-6    772
 4     AST-BR1           149,027,230   C-S   2-4    790
 5     Javel             139,926,940   C-S   2-6    532

And now, a selection of replays (except where specified, these are recorded with WolfMAME 0.99, see above):

PROMETHEUS - 547,501,230 - A-L - ALL - 854 Hit (ddonpchj, recorded with mamep99 lagless)
PROMETHEUS - 505,740,390 - A-L - ALL - 835 Hit (ddonpchj)
Erppo - 254,708,360 - C-S - 2-7 - 777 Hit (ddonpachj recorded with shmupmame 2.2)
.ASP - 232,849,860 - C-L - 2-5 - 778 hits (ddonpach, recorded with mamep99 lagless I suppose from previous submissions), Mirror
LtC - 168,714,430 - C-L - 2-6 - 772 Hit (ddonpchj, recorded with mamep99 lagless)
Erppo - 159,172,810 - C-S- 2-5 - 808 Hit (ddonpchj, recorded with Shmupmame v3.0)
PROMETHEUS - 148,277,600 - B-L - 2-6 - 473 Hit (ddonpchj)
PROMETHEUS - 144'545'270 - C-S - 2-7 - 395 Hit (ddonpchj)
Javel - 139,926,940 - C-S- 2-6 - 532 Hit (ddonpchj shmupmamev3b)
S.S - 135,552,940 - A-L - 2-7 - 497 Hit (recorded with mamep99 lagless)
ncp - 134,467,590 - C-S - 2-3 - 810 Hit (ddonpchj, recorded with mame32plus 0.131)
RWM - 133,405,190 - A-L - 2-4 - 677 Hit (ddonpchj)
Ravid - 128,462,490 - B-L - 2-4 - 491 Hit (ddonpchj, recorded with mamep99 lagless)
Malik11 - 120,733,880 - A-L - 2-4 - 485 (ddonpach, recorded with mame32 0.90u1)
Zerst - 110,724,980 - C-S - 2-5 - 396 (ddonpach, recorded with wolf99)
Sapz - 92,269,180 - A-L - 2-5 - 478 Hit (ddonpchj, recorded with mamep99 lagless)
Zerst - 82,551,520 - C-S - 2-3 - 396 Hit (ddonpchj, recorded with mamep99 lagless)
Sasupoika - 76,001,810 - C-S - 2-4 - 337 Hit (ddonpchj, recorded with MAME+ GUI 1.4.9c)
DAD - 61,948,110 - A-L - 2-1 - 475 Hit (ddonpach, recorded with mame32 0.90u1)
Prales - 48,857,000 - B-S - 1-6 - 493 (shmupmame 4.0 old style gui)

Previous Threads:
Dodonpachi New Thread # 4
Dodonpachi New Thread # 3
Dodonpachi New Thread # 2
Dodonpachi New Thread
Dodonpachi Thread

=SNC= · Joined: 02 Apr 2010 Posts: 61

Everything updated, I hope I've not screwed anything

Remember to post scores in the right format AND to state every info needed to playback your inputs

PROMETHEUS · Joined: 27 Feb 2007 Posts: 2252 Location: France

Good job, great to have an updated table.
I love to see Zetzumarchen's new 200M+ score up there, keep it up !

moozooh · Joined: 27 Jul 2007 Posts: 3682 Location: moscow/russia

Just a couple more shots!

Code:

58    Pulsewidth         41,227,960   C-S   1-All  287
59    Bydoslave          42,117,110   C-S   1-6    395

=SNC= · Joined: 02 Apr 2010 Posts: 61

moozooh wrote:

Just a couple more shots!

Code:

58    Pulsewidth         41,227,960   C-S   1-All  287
59    Bydoslave          42,117,110   C-S   1-6    395

Thank you, fixed!
Anyway it was a persisting error from the previous thread

Despatche · **Posted:** Tue Dec 21, 2010 8:44 am

I like this table because nearly every score is a clear or good enough

one of these days every score will be at least 100,000,000 and that will make me so happy

spadgy · **Posted:** Wed Dec 22, 2010 5:35 pm

Is this still capped at 60? I'd love to submit my score!

moozooh · Joined: 27 Jul 2007 Posts: 3682 Location: moscow/russia

Learn2play.™ :mrgreen:

Despatche · **Posted:** Wed Dec 22, 2010 7:09 pm

Are the individual tables capped to five places?

moozooh · Joined: 27 Jul 2007 Posts: 3682 Location: moscow/russia

Personally, I'd rather have large individual tables and a smaller overall one. Say, 40–50 and 30 places, respectively.

Despatche · **Posted:** Wed Dec 22, 2010 8:31 pm

20 overall and 50 individual, maybe? That sounds good too.

PROMETHEUS · Joined: 27 Feb 2007 Posts: 2252 Location: France

I prefer large overall and small individual, because ships are fairly balanced in this game and the most important is to see how well each ranks among all players.

spadgy · **Posted:** Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:27 am

moozooh wrote:

Learn2play.™ :mrgreen:

Fair point!

I'm just gutted my 1-ALL is too puny!

=SNC= · Joined: 02 Apr 2010 Posts: 61

My reply come late because I took my time to think about Spadgy question^_^

First:

PROMETHEUS wrote:

I prefer large overall and small individual, because ships are fairly balanced in this game and the most important is to see how well each ranks among all players.

I agree with Prometheus here and also it's an assle to keep on editing multiple tables^_^.

I think that earning a spot on the scoreboard should be not too easy: what's the sense of a scoreboard if you can play the game for a few days and have your name on it already? Where is the challenge in that? But you can't also set the bar too high or newcomers will be discouraged by the fact that it will take forever to even get on the scoreboard, let alone taking top positions.

So I'm asking here: what is a reasonable score that can be reached with a "medium" effort? I believe that score lays around the 50 million mark, so I'm gonna keep 60 position until the last one is a 50 million score; after that we could make a rule that "who gets more than 50 million, deserve a spot on the scoreboard".

Am I mad?
Discuss xD.

moozooh · Joined: 27 Jul 2007 Posts: 3682 Location: moscow/russia

Well, 50 million is actually pretty high if you don't attempt (and succeed at) full level chains. I'd say 40 should be the entry point, definitely not higher.

The reason I wanted larger individual tables was to facilitate using ships other than the one you get the highest score with. I remember some people here enjoying type B more, for one, but getting consistently lower scores with it.

PROMETHEUS · Joined: 27 Feb 2007 Posts: 2252 Location: France

=SNC= wrote:

So I'm asking here: what is a reasonable score that can be reached with a "medium" effort? I believe that score lays around the 50 million mark, so I'm gonna keep 60 position until the last one is a 50 million score; after that we could make a rule that "who gets more than 50 million, deserve a spot on the scoreboard".

I would have said exactly 50M too. That's the score you get when you 1CC and make some light attempts at chaining or getting some maximum bonus, in other words, when you start to take advantage of the basic scoring rules of the game. It represents approximately 1/4 of the optimal score for the first loop.

Then again, I feel it's very important to encourage new players to "compete" and display/compare their scores, even if they haven't made so much efforts in that particular game, so I think the best would be a much lower score cap, such as 30M.

Despatche · **Posted:** Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:25 pm

On place caps: seems we really only have two choices; you can remove the "overall" board, or you can remove all the "individual" boards (obviously my heart is with the former).

On score caps: we already have 40,000,000 as a soft cap, may as well go with it

spadgy · **Posted:** Fri Dec 24, 2010 6:51 pm

=SNC= wrote:

Discuss xD.

There's actually a general discussion going on about score board capping here.

I'd been meaning to start it for ages, and this DDP thread finally got me into gear!

PurpBullets · Joined: 16 Mar 2010 Posts: 53 Location: Kentucky

Finally got the 1-ALL. This has been my week.

=SNC= · Joined: 02 Apr 2010 Posts: 61

PurpBullets wrote:

Finally got the 1-ALL. This has been my week.

Congratulations for your score, please next time remember to post it in the right format, e.g.:
PROMETHEUS 547,501,230 A-L ALL 854

How long did it take to reach this score?

P.S.: I will be adding any score above the 40 million mark.

PurpBullets · Joined: 16 Mar 2010 Posts: 53 Location: Kentucky

My bad, I was more proud about the 1cc than the score.
I have been playing it every now and then for 2 years,
but the past 4 days I have been in the zone.

tinotormed · Joined: 24 May 2010 Posts: 855 Location: Philippines

PurpBullets wrote:

My bad, I was more proud about the 1cc than the score.
I have been playing it every now and then for 2 years,
but the past 4 days I have been in the zone.

Let me help you...

PurpBullets wrote:

PurpBullets - 46,649,840 - C-S - 1-ALL - 323

... there, happy now? Note that next time you are going to post a screenshot or your inp, you are supposed to indicate your score with the format mentioned. Or better yet, use pen and paper so you do not need to get the author confused. Are we clear?

PurpBullets · Joined: 16 Mar 2010 Posts: 53 Location: Kentucky

tinotormed wrote:

PurpBullets wrote:

My bad, I was more proud about the 1cc than the score.
I have been playing it every now and then for 2 years,
but the past 4 days I have been in the zone.

Let me help you...

PurpBullets wrote:

PurpBullets - 46,649,840 - C-S - 1-ALL - 323

... there, happy now? Note that next time you are going to post a screenshot or your inp, you are supposed to indicate your score with the format mentioned. Or better yet, use pen and paper so you do not need to get the author confused. Are we clear?

You arent helping anybody, I have been happy? hahaha
Hahaha I said my bad, =SNC= made it clear. before you?
Dont be mad tiny.

captpain · Joined: 23 Jul 2008 Posts: 1771

You're from Kentucky... is English your first language?

PurpBullets · Joined: 16 Mar 2010 Posts: 53 Location: Kentucky

captpain wrote:

You're from Kentucky... is English your first language?

What makes you ask?

Erppo · Joined: 09 Jan 2011 Posts: 721 Location: Finland

Took a little break from Daifukkatsu for this history lesson:

Erppo - 159,172,810 - C-S - 2-5 - 808
Input for Shmupmame v3.0

Completely screwed up my chaining in 1-4 and died stupidly at the easiest attack of the 1-3 boss, but otherwise I'm pretty happy with this one. I might still try to improve this, as I think I could even break 200M if everything went perfectly.

=SNC= · Joined: 02 Apr 2010 Posts: 61

Erppo wrote:

Took a little break from Daifukkatsu for this history lesson:

Erppo - 159,172,810 - C-S - 2-5 - 808
Input for Shmupmame v3.0

Completely screwed up my chaining in 1-4 and died stupidly at the easiest attack of the 1-3 boss, but otherwise I'm pretty happy with this one. I might still try to improve this, as I think I could even break 200M if everything went perfectly.

Scoreboard updated, thank you for your submission and for the replay^^

Chirpy13 · Joined: 23 May 2011 Posts: 97

MJR · Joined: 27 Jan 2005 Posts: 791 Location: Finland

After many years, I got back to this game & managed to beat my old high score!

I played perfect game (no losing lives or using bombs) up till stage 4 boss, from there it was steady downhill..

MJR - 43,755,460 - C-S - 1-6 - 386

=SNC= · Joined: 02 Apr 2010 Posts: 61

Updated!

It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 10:40 am	View unanswered posts
Board index » Shmups » Hi Scores	View active topics

shmups.system11.org

DoDonPachi 2010 (New thread #5)

Who is online